SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İnönü üniversitesi Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksek Okulu Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Comparıson of the Effects of Supportıve Care Provıded by Student Nurses and Routıne Care in Normal Delıvery on Bırth Comfort

NORMAL DOĞUMDA ÖĞRENCİ HEMŞİRE TARAFINDAN VERİLENDESTEKLEYİCİ BAKIM İLE RUTIN BAKIMIN DOĞUM KONFORUNAETKİSİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Çiğdem GÜN KAKAŞÇI
Merve GEZGİÇ
Hilal DİNÇER
Pages
770–780
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

While the mean score of the experiment group’s Birth Comfort Scale was36.0±3.7, it has been founda as 34.7±4.2 in the control group (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the study is to compare the effects of supportive care provided by student nurses and routine carein normal delivery on birth comfort.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is an experimental study. 108 women who had normal vaginal delivery inthe province of Burdur constituted the sample.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While the mean score of the experiment group’s Birth Comfort Scale was36.0±3.7, it has been founda as 34.7±4.2 in the control group (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to compare the effects of supportive care provided by student nurses and routine carein normal delivery on birth comfort. It is an experimental study. 108 women who had normal vaginal delivery inthe province of Burdur constituted the sample. The data have been collected with face-to-face interview methodby using a descriptive information form and the Childbirth Comfort Scale. A total of 108 cases have beenincluded to the study, they have been divided as; 54 experiment (given supportive care by the student nurse) and54 control (given routine care) group. The level of statistical significance has been accepted as p0.05). The experiment and controlgroups are similar in terms of; education status, occupation, economic status, spouse’s education status andspouse’s occupation (p>0.05). While the mean score of the experiment group’s Birth Comfort Scale was36.0±3.7, it has been founda as 34.7±4.2 in the control group (p

Özet

Araştırmanın amacı normal doğumda öğrenci hemşire tarafından verilen destekleyici bakım ile rutin bakımın doğum konforuna etkisini karşılaştırmaktır. Deneysel bir çalışmadır. Örneklemi Burdur ilinde vajinal doğum yapmış 108 kadın oluşturmuştur. Veriler tanıtıcı veri formu ve Doğum konfor Ölçeği kullanılarak yüz yüze görüşme yöntemi ile toplanmıştır. Toplamda 108 vaka çalışmaya alınmış olup; 54 deney (öğrenci hemşire tarafından destekleyici bakım verilen) ve 54 kontrol (rutin bakım verilen) grubu olarak ayrılmıştır. İstatistiksel anlamlılık p0.05). Eğitim durumu, meslek, ekonomik durum, eşin eğitim durumu, eşin mesleği açısından deney ve kontrol grupları benzerdir (p>0.05). Deney grubunda doğum konfor ölçeği puanı 36.0±3.7 iken; kontrol grubunda 34.7±4.2 olarak bulunmuştur (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KAKAŞÇI, Ç. G., GEZGİÇ, M., DİNÇER, H. (2022). Comparıson of the Effects of Supportıve Care Provıded by Student Nurses and Routıne Care in Normal Delıvery on Bırth Comfort. İnönü üniversitesi Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksek Okulu Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 770–780. https://ajindex.com/articles/548267

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Arslan, H., Konuk Şener, D. (2009). Stigma, spiritüalite ve konfor kavramlarının Meleis’ in kavram geliştirme sürecine göre irdelenmesi. Maltepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Bilim ve Sanatı Dergisi, 2(1), 51-58.
  2. Bassah, N., Nkengbeza, N. F., Ambe, N. C., Ebob-Anya, B. A. (2020). Postpartum mothers’ perspectives of comfort measures used by nurses and midwives during labor and delivery in a secondary level hospital maternity in cameroon. Asian Research Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 31-37.
  3. Behruzi, R., Hatem, M., Goulet, L., Fraser, W. D. (2014). Perception of humanization of birth in a highly specialized hospital: let’s think differently. Health Care Women Int. 35, 127–148. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2013.857321 Betty J. A., Ladwig G. B., Makic M. B. F. (2018). Çeviren: Gürhan N., Kitiş Y., Polat Ü. ve Fidancı B. E. Hemşirelik Tanılari El Kitabı Bakım Planlamasında Kanıta Dayalı Rehber, 11 Baskı, Ankara: Nobel Tıp Kitapevleri, 505-508.
  4. Britton J. R. (2006). Global satisfaction with perinatal care: stability and relation to anxiety, depression, and stressful medical events. American Journal of Medical Quality; 21(3),200-5.
  5. Deliktas A., Kukulu, K. (2018). A meta-analysis of the effect on maternal health of upright positions during the second stage of labour, without routine epidural analgesia. J Adv Nurs, 74(2), 263–278. doi:10.1111/jan.13447 Foureur, M., Davis, D., Fenwick, J., Leap, N., Iedema, R., Forbes, I., Homer, C. S. (2010). The relationship between birth unit design and safe, satisfying birth: developing a hypothetical model. Midwifery, 26, 520– 525. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.05.015 Garlock, A. E., Arthurs, J. B., Bass, R. J. (2017). Effects of comfort education on maternal comfort and labor pain. The Journal of perinatal education, 26(2), 96. Gungor, I., Beji, N. K. (2012). Development and psychometric testing of the scales for measuring maternal satisfaction in normal and caesarean birth. Midwifery, 28(3), 348–357.
  6. Güvenç, M., Kanan, N. (1993). Cerrahi hastaların hemşirelerden ve öğrenci hemşirelerden beklentileri. Hemşirelik Bülteni 7(30), 83-96
  7. Hall, P. J., Foster, J. W., Yount, K. M., Jennings, B. M. (2018). Keeping it together and falling apart: women’s dynamic experience of birth. Midwifery, 58,130–136.
  8. Hauck, Y., Nathan, E., Ball, C., Hutchinson, M., Somerville, S., Hornbuckle, J., Doherty, D. (2018). Women’s reasons and perceptions around planning a homebirth with a registered midwife in Western Australia. Women and Birth, 33(1), e39-e47. Hodne