SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

An examination the presence of which was held By the temporary article 13 of law of law yers

Avukatlık kanunu geçici madde 13’de düzenlenen dava vekili kurumunun mevcudiyeti hakkında bir inceleme

Recep AKCAN
Pages
1–10
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Until the temporary Article 13 of the 1939 Regulations the issue of the licences which were granted to some lawyers to practice law in Turkey was a controvesial issue.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Until the temporary Article 13 of the 1939 Regulations the issue of the licences which were granted to some lawyers to practice law in Turkey was a controvesial issue.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Until the temporary Article 13 of the 1939 Regulations the issue of the licences which were granted to some lawyers to practice law in Turkey was a controvesial issue.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Until the temporary Article 13 of the 1939 Regulations the issue of the licences which were granted to some lawyers to practice law in Turkey was a controvesial issue.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Until the temporary Article 13 of the 1939 Regulations the issue of the licences which were granted to some lawyers to practice law in Turkey was a controvesial issue.

Özet

Türk Hukukunda 1939 yılına kadar kendilerine dava ruhsatnamesi verilen dava vekilleri, mevzuatta hukuken yer alsa da, fiilen varlıkları tartışmalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKCAN, R. (2022). An examination the presence of which was held By the temporary article 13 of law of law yers. İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 1–10. https://ajindex.com/articles/548062

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Aday N.: Avukatlık Hukukunun Genel Esasları, İstanbul 1997. Akcan R.: İcra Hukukunda Temsil (SÜHFD 1999/1-2 s. 21-62). Alangoya H. Y.: Medeni Usul Hukuku Esasları, I, İstanbul 2000. Alangoya Y./Yıldırım M. K./Deren-Yıldırım N.:Medeni Usul Hukuku Esasları, İstanbul 2011. Ansay S. Ş.: Hukuk Yargılama Usulleri, Ankara 1960. Arslan R./Tanrıver S.:Yargı Örgütü Hukuku, Ankara 2001. Berkin N. M.:Tatbikatçılara Medeni Usul Hukuku Rehberi, İstanbul 1981. Bilge N./Önen E.:Medeni Yargılama Hukuku Dersleri, Ankara 1978. Kaçak N.:Yargı Kararlarıyla Avukatlık Kanunu ve İlgili Mevzuat, Ankara 2001. Karafakih İ. H.:Hukuk Muhakemeleri Usulü Esasları, Ankara 1952.:
  2. Hukuk Muhakemeleri Usulü, C. II, İstanbul 2001. Kuru B. Kuru B./Arslan R./Yılmaz E.:Medeni Usul Hukuku, Ankara 2012. Önen B.:Medeni Yargılama Hukuku, Ankara 1979. Pekcanıtez H.: Medeni Usul Hukuku, Ankara 2000. Pekcanıtez H./Atalay O./Özekes M. 2012.:Medeni Usul Hukuku, Ankara Postacıoğlu İ. E.:Medeni Usul Hukuku Dersleri, İstanbul 1975. Tanrıver S./Tercan E./Deynekli A.:Avukatlık Mevzuat, Ankara 1996. Kanunu ve İlgili Ulukapı Ö./Akcan R./Ercan İ.:Kaynakçalı, İçtihatlı ve Notlu Avukatlık Hukuku Mevzuatı, Konya 2002. Üstündağ S. 10: Medeni Yargılama Hukuku, C. I-II, İstanbul 1997.