Journals / İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Where in freedom of expression is hate speech?

Nefret söylemi ifade özgürlüğünün neresinde?

Pages
205–240
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, the concept which lacks certain conceptual and legal frame, will be examined through the interpretations of ECHR case law.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper aims to undertake hate speech - a conceptually debatable concept - to its relation to freedom of expression and accordingly search for the definition, content and interpretations of the concept.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this regard; the reference to the concept to define certain expression and actions, the position of the concept in relation to freedom of speech and what constitutes this position will be point at issue.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, the concept which lacks certain conceptual and legal frame, will be examined through the interpretations of ECHR case law.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper aims to undertake hate speech - a conceptually debatable concept - to its relation to freedom of expression and accordingly search for the definition, content and interpretations of the concept. In this regard; the reference to the concept to define certain expression and actions, the position of the concept in relation to freedom of speech and what constitutes this position will be point at issue. Because it is considered to be important to define the concept in order to avoid unjustified limitations to freedom of speech along with protecting the individuals and areas that are subjected to hate speech; the paper will examine international and national human rights documents while trying to hold a critical position. Finally, the concept which lacks certain conceptual and legal frame, will be examined through the interpretations of ECHR case law.

Özet

Bu yazı tartışmalı bir kavram olan nefret söylemini bir insan hakkı olan ifade özgürlüğü ile ilişkisi bakımından ele almayı ve bu bakımdan kavramın tanım, içerik ve uygulama alanını aramayı amaç edinmektedir. Bu anlamda kavramın; hangi ifade ve eylemleri tasvir etmek adına kullanıldığı, ifade özgürlüğü ile olan ilişkisinde nerede konumlandırıldığı ve bu konumlandırmanın neyi esas alarak gerçekleştirildiği konu edilecektir. Nefret söylemini açıklığa kavuşturmanın, kavramın konu edindiği alan ve kişileri korumak kadar ifade özgürlüğünün gerekçesiz ihlallerinin önüne geçilmesi bakımından da önemli olduğu düşünüldüğünden yazı; kritik bir pozisyonda kalmaya çabalarken, kavrama ilişkin uluslararası insan hakları belgeleri ve yerel hukuki düzenlemeleri ele alacaktır. Son olarak gerek tanımsal, gerekse hukuksal olarak yerleşik kesin bir çerçeveden yoksun olan kavram AİHM’si içtihatları dâhilinde irdelenecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİK, E. (2022). Where in freedom of expression is hate speech?. İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 205–240. https://ajindex.com/articles/548053

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Alexander Tsesis, Dignity and Speech the Regulation of Hate Speech in Democracy, Wake Forest Law Review, Vol. 44, 2009
  2. Bhiktu Parekh, Hate Speech Is There a Case for Banning?, Public Policy Research, 2006
  3. ECHR Factsheet on Hate Speech, ECHR Press Unit, 2012
  4. Eric Barendt, Freedom of Speech, Oxford University Press Eric Bleich, The Rise of Hate Speech and Hate Crime Laws in Liberal Democracies, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37:6, 2011 Ivan Hare & James Weinstein, Extreme Speech and Democracy, Oxford University Press, 2010
  5. James Weinstein, Hate Speech, viewpoint neutrality and the American concept of Democracy, The Boundaries of freedom of Expression&Order in American Democracy, ed. Thomas R. Hensley, Kent University Press, 2001
  6. Jeremy Waldron, The Harm in Hate Speech, Harvard Press, 2012
  7. Jeremy Waldron, Dignity and Defamation: The Visibility of Hate, Oliver Halmes Lectures, Harvard Law Review, Vol 123: 1596 Johannes Morsink, The universal Declaration of human Rights: Origins, Drafting and Intent, University of Pensnsylvania, 1999
  8. Kevin Boyle, Hate Speech The United States versus The Rest of the World, 53. Me. L. Rev, 2001
  9. Kevin Boyle, Controlling Hate Speech: What do the International Standards require of Turkey s.66, Nefret Suçları ve Nefret Söylemi, Uluslararası Hrant Dink Vakfı Yayınları, 2010 McGoldrick&O’Donnel, Hate-speech Laws: Consistency with National and International Human Rights Law, Legal Studies, Volume 18 issue 4, 453-485, 1998 http://www.law-democracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/10.02.hate- speech.Macedonia-book.pdf Oetheimer Mario, Protecting Freedom of Expression: The Challenge of Hate Speech in the European Court of Human Rights Law, Cardozo J. of Int’l & Comp. Law,Vol. 17:427 Rabat Plan of Action on the prohibition of advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence, OHCHR, 2012 http://www.un.org/en/preventgenocide/adviser/pdf/Rabat_draft_outco me.pdf Slagle Mark, An Ethical Exploration of Free Expression and the Problem of Hate Speech, Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 24:238–250, 2009
  10. Stanley Fish, There’s No Such Thing as Free Speech and It’s a Good Thing Too, Oxford University Press, 1994 Steiner&Alston, International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics, Morals, Oxford University Press, 2008
  11. Tarlach McGonagle, The Council of Europe Against Online Hate Speech: Conundrums and Challenges, 2013 http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/standardsetting/media/belgrade2013/