SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

TURNING POINTS IN THE RECOGNITION OF STATES : BADINTER COMMISSION AND KOSOVO'S DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE

DEVLETLERİN TANINMASINDA DÖNÜM NOKTALARI: BADİNTER KOMİSYONU VE KOSOVA'NIN TANINMASI

Ezeli AZARKAN
Pages
143–184
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this article, the consequences stemmed from these two cases are to be examined

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article intends to examine the developments in international law in relation to the recognition of new states within the frame work of the Badinter Commission and Kosovo's declaration of independence.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The self-determination in Yugoslavia authorized within the limits of Badinter Commission, European Community and the International Community has contributed to settling issues of sovereignty and secession.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this article, the consequences stemmed from these two cases are to be examined
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article intends to examine the developments in international law in relation to the recognition of new states within the frame work of the Badinter Commission and Kosovo's declaration of independence. The self-determination in Yugoslavia authorized within the limits of Badinter Commission, European Community and the International Community has contributed to settling issues of sovereignty and secession. Kosovo's unilateral and immediate declaration of independence has divided the international community. Many European countries both recognized Kosovo and gave support to its independence declaration. However, some European countries denounced this action of Kosovo's parliament as unlawful and contrary to international law. In this article, the consequences stemmed from these two cases are to be examined

Özet

Bu makale Kosova'nın bağımsızlık ilanı ve Badinter Komisyonu çerçevesinde yeni devletlerin tanınmasına ilişkin uluslararası hukuktaki gelişmeleri incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Badinter Komisyonu Avrupa Topluluğu ve uluslararası toplumun yetkilendirdiği sınırlar içinde Yugoslavya'daki self-determinasyon, ayrılma ve egemenlik konularını çözümüne katkı sağladı. Kosova'nın tek taraflı ve ani bağımsızlık ilanı ise uluslararası toplumu ikiye böldü. Birçok Avrupa devleti Kosova'yı hemen tanıdı ve Kosova'nın bağımsızlık deklarasyonuna destek verdi. Bazı Avrupalı devletler ise Kosova Parlamentosunun eylemini uluslararası hukuka aykırı ve hukuk dışı bir eylem olarak niteledi. Bu makalede, bu iki durumun ortaya çıkardığı durumları incelenecektir

🔖

Cite This Article

AZARKAN, E. (2022). TURNING POINTS IN THE RECOGNITION OF STATES : BADINTER COMMISSION AND KOSOVO'S DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE. İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 143–184. https://ajindex.com/articles/547940

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Benedict, Kingsbury, " Claims by Non- State Grups in International Law", Cornel International Law Journal, Vol.25,No.3,1992. Bennett,Christopher, Yugoslavia's Bloody Collapse: Causes, Course and Consequences, NYU Press, New York, 1997.
  2. Bing JIA, Bing, "The Independence of Kosovo: A Unique Caseof Secession?", Chinese Journal of International Law, Vol. 8, No1,2009. Borgen,Christopher J.," Kosovo's Declaration of Independence: Self- Determination, Secession and Recognition", American Society of International Law: Asil Insight, 2008, http://slomanson.tjsl.edu/2.4_KosSecession.pdf tarihi 18.01.2009 ) ( Erişim Brown, Bartram, Human Rights, Sovereignty, and the Final Status of Kosovo, Chicago-Kent Law Review,Vol.80,No.1,2005. Calic,Marie-Janine," Kosovo in the Twentieth Century: A Historical Account", Kosovo and The Challenge Of Humanitarian Intervention: Selective Indignation", Collective Action, and International iıtizenship, Eds.: Albrecht Schnabel & Ramesh Thakur, United Nations University Press,
  3. New York, Paris, Tokyo, 2000.
  4. Cassese, Antonio, Reappraisal,Cambridge University Press, New York, 1999. of Peoples: A Legal Charney, Jonathan, "Self-determination: Chechnya, Kosovo, East Timor",Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol.34,No 2,2001. Daskalovski,Zhidas, " The Independence of Kosovo and the Consolidation of Macedonia--A Reason to Worry?", Journal of Contemporary European Studies, Vol. 16, No. 2,, 2008. De Wet,Erika, "The Governance of Kosovo: Securıty Council Resolution 1244 and The Establishment and Functionıng Of Eulex ", The Vol.103,No.1,2009.
  5. Journal Of Internatıonal Law, Delahunty,Robert J. and Perez, Antonio F., "The Kosovo Crisis: A Dostoievskian Dialogue on International Law, Statecraft, and Soulcraft", Vanderbilt Journal Of Transnational Law, Vol.42,No.1, 2009.
  6. Dugard, John, "Secession: Is the Case of Yugoslavia a Precedent for Africa?" African Journal of International & Comparative Law, Vol. 5, No.1,1993. Dugard John and Raic David, "The Role of Recognition in the Law and Practice of Secession", Secession: International Law Perspectives, ( Ed. )Marcelo Kohen, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,2006.
  7. Erlanger, Steven," Yugoslavs Demand a Role in U.N. Kosovo Settlement", N.Y. TIMES, 22 Mayıs1999. Grant,Thomas D., The Recognition of States: Law and Practice in Debate and Evolution, Westpost Press, London,1999. Hill,Christopher, European Foreign Policy: Key Documents, Routledge, London, 2000.
  8. Hilpold, Peter, "The Kosovo Case and Inte