Journals / İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

WHOLE BUSINESS SECURITIZATION

TİCARİ İŞLETME MENKUL KIYMETLEŞTİRMESİ

Pages
25–64
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article examines mainly the market background and reasons of the WBS; the legal mechanism and the economic value of the WBS; differences between the traditional securitization and the implementation possibility of the WBS, under the Turkish capital market law

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:As an innovative financial technique the whole business securitization (WBS) first appeared in the United K ingdom in the mid 1990s.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The WBS spreads to the United States and Japan in the early 2000s which have different insolvency law from that of the United Kingdom.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article examines mainly the market background and reasons of the WBS; the legal mechanism and the economic value of the WBS; differences between the traditional securitization and the implementation possibility of the WBS, under the Turkish capital market law
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

As an innovative financial technique the whole business securitization (WBS) first appeared in the United K ingdom in the mid 1990s. The WBS later expanded to the countries which has insolvency legislations similar to United Kingdom. The WBS spreads to the United States and Japan in the early 2000s which have different insolvency law from that of the United Kingdom. This article aims to shed a new light on little known WBS to explore new possibilities for innovative securitization after the global financial crisis. This article examines mainly the market background and reasons of the WBS; the legal mechanism and the economic value of the WBS; differences between the traditional securitization and the implementation possibility of the WBS, under the Turkish capital market law

Özet

Ticari işletme menkul kıymetleştirmesi, menkul kıymetleştirme olarak nitelenen bir işletme finansman sistemidir. Ticari işletme menkul kıymetleştirmesi, ilk kez Birleşik Krallık ve onunla benzer iflas hukuku düzenlemelerine sahip ülkelerde uygulanmıştır. Ticari işletme menkul kıymetleştirmesi en son olarak ise ABD, Japonya ve diğer ülkelerde farklı yapılar dâhilinde uygulanmıştır. Makalede az bilinen ticari işletme finansmanı yöntemi olan ticari işletme menkul kıymetleştirmesi sistemine ışık tutularak, hukuki ve ekonomik işleyişi ele alınacak ve en son olarak ise sistemin Türk sermaye piyasası hukukunda uygulanabilirliği hususu değerlendirilecektir

🔖

Cite This Article

AKTAŞ, M. M. (2022). WHOLE BUSINESS SECURITIZATION. İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 25–64. https://ajindex.com/articles/547937

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Aral, Fahrettin. (1991). "Topyekûn Temlik", AÜHF, C. 42, S. 1-4, s. 93 Bell, Ian /Dawson, Petrina. (2002). "Synthetic Securitization: Use of Derivative Technology for Credit Transfer". Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, S. 12, s. 541-562
  2. Brown, Mayer. (22.06.2009). "Big Changes to Securitization Accounting", 23.05. 2016 tarihinde https://www.mayerbrown.com/files/Publication/fab3ec 91- d064-4740-89b2 a9c42d373dc1/Presentation/ PublicationAttachment/6a14e039-2b95-4246-85b8- bde2733bb7fb/UPDATE_Securitization_FASB_ 0609_V2.pdf adresinden erişildi. Chesler, C.: (Summer/Fall 2007). "A New British Invasion? Whole Business ABS (A Wholly Securitizable Business)", American Securitization, C. 1, S. 2, s. 48 vd. Fabozzi, F. J. /Kothari, Vinod.(2008).
  3. Introduction to Securitization, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey Forte, Joseph Philip. (Fall 1996). "Capital Markets Mortgage: A Ratable Model for Main Street and Wall Street", Real Property, Probate and Trust Journal, S. 3, s. 2 vd. Frehen, R./ Rouwenhorst, Geert K. / Goetzmann, William N.(2012). Dutch Securities for American Land Speculation in the Late-Eighteenth Century, s. 1 vd. 01.08. 2014 tarihinde http://www.nber.org/chapters/c12795.pdf adresinden erişildi. Goetzmann, William N./Newman, F. (2010). Securitization in the 1920's, National Bureu of Economic Research-NBER Working Paper No:15650, Massachusetts Gorvett, R. W.: Insurance Securitization: The Development of a New Asset Class, 22.05.2016 tarihinde http://www.casact.org/pubs/dpp/dpp99/99dpp133.pdf adresinden erişildi. Gülerci, Altan F. (2014).
  4. Borçlar Hukuku Dersleri, Kütahya Hill, C. A. (1996). Securitization: "A Low-Cost Sweetener for Lemons, Washington University Law Quarterly", C. 74, S. 4, s. 1063 vd. Hill, C. A. (2002). Whole Business Securitization in Emerging Markets, Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, Symposium: International Securitization and Structured Finance, C. 12, S. 2 (2002), s. 521-533 (WBS) Horton, Brent J. (2009). "In Defense of Private Label Mortgage-Backed Securities", Florida Law Review, S. 61, s. 842. Klee, Kenneth N./ Butler, Brent C. (2002). "Asset-Backed Securitization, Special Purchase Vehicles and Other Securitization Issues", Uniform Commercial Code Law Journal, S. 35, s. 23 vd. Kothari, V. (2006). Securitization: The Financial Instrument of the Future, John Wiley & Sons, Singapore 2006 (Book) Kothari, V. (2002). "Whole Business Securitization: Secured Lending Repackaged? A Comment on Hill"