Journals / İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 16

Secondary School Teachers? Perceptions about Their Problem Solving Abilities

Ortaöğretimde Görev Yapan Öğretmenlerin Problem Çözme Becerilerine İlişkin Algıları

Pages
177–198
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results also showed that there were statistically significant differences among teachers? perceptions according to their seniority the last school of graduation and the education level of teachers? mothers and fathers

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the study is to determine the perceptions of high school teachers about their level of problem solving skills and to find out whether their perceptions differ according to gender seniority branch marital status how many children they have the last school of graduation their mothers? and fathers? the level of education The research was conducted on 445 high school teachers working in Malatya city center during 2005 2006 academic year The data were collected using Problem Solving Inventory Form A PSI A In order to analyze the data t test One Way Anova LSD Kruskal Wallis H test and Mann Whitney U test were used Research results revealed that high school teachers perceived their problem solving skill levels as ?medium?
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of the study is to determine the perceptions of high school teachers about their level of problem solving skills and to find out whether their perceptions differ according to gender seniority branch marital status how many children they have the last school of graduation their mothers? and fathers? the level of education The research was conducted on 445 high school teachers working in Malatya city center during 2005 2006 academic year The data were collected using Problem Solving Inventory Form A PSI A In order to analyze the data t test One Way Anova LSD Kruskal Wallis H test and Mann Whitney U test were used Research results revealed that high school teachers perceived their problem solving skill levels as ?medium?
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results also showed that there were statistically significant differences among teachers? perceptions according to their seniority the last school of graduation and the education level of teachers? mothers and fathers
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Problem çözme becerisi · problem çözme · öğretmen becerileri

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to determine the perceptions of high school teachers about their level of problem solving skills and to find out whether their perceptions differ according to gender seniority branch marital status how many children they have the last school of graduation their mothers? and fathers? the level of education The research was conducted on 445 high school teachers working in Malatya city center during 2005 2006 academic year The data were collected using Problem Solving Inventory Form A PSI A In order to analyze the data t test One Way Anova LSD Kruskal Wallis H test and Mann Whitney U test were used Research results revealed that high school teachers perceived their problem solving skill levels as ?medium? Results also showed that there were statistically significant differences among teachers? perceptions according to their seniority the last school of graduation and the education level of teachers? mothers and fathers

Özet

Araştırmanın amacı, ortaöğretimde görev yapan öğretmenlerin problem çözme becerilerine ilişkin algılarının düzeyini ve algılar arasında cinsiyet, kıdem, branş, medeni durum, çocuk sayısı, en son mezun olduğu okul, anne ve babanın eğitim düzeyi değişkenlerine göre fark olup olmadığını saptamaktır. Araştırma 2006-2007 öğretim yılında, Malatya ili şehir merkezinde görev yapan 445 lise öğretmeni üzerinde yapılmıştır. Araştırma verileri, orijinali P .P. Heppner ve C. H. Petersen (1982) tarafından geliştirilen, N. Şahin, N. H. Şahin ve P. P. Heppner (1993) tarafından Türkçe’ye uyarlanan Problem Çözme Envanteri-A Formu (PÇE-A) kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Analizlerde t testi, tek yönlü varyans analizi, LSD, Kruskal Wallis-H testi ve Mann Whitney-U testi kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonunda, katılan öğretmenlerin problem çözme becerilerinin düzeyini “orta” olarak algıladıkları, öğretmenlerin problem çözme becerilerine ilişkin algıları arasında kıdem, en son mezun olduğu okul, anne ve babanın eğitim düzeyi değişkenlerine göre istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı farklar olduğu saptanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRTAŞ, H., DÖNMEZ, B. (2022). Secondary School Teachers? Perceptions about Their Problem Solving Abilities. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 16, 177–198. https://ajindex.com/articles/547659

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. KAYNAKLAR/REFERENCES KAYNAKLAR/REFERENCES KAYNAKLAR/REFERENCES LAR/REFERENCES LAR/REFERENCES Aban, S., Altıntoprak, A. (2005). Hemşirelerde problem çözme becerileri: özdeğerlendirme Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi. 2005 (62-76). analizleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Adair, J. (2000). Karar verme ve problem çözme. (Çev: N. Kalaycı). Ankara:
  2. Gazi Kitabevi.
  3. Arnold, J. D. (1992). The complete problem solver. Canada: John Wiley & Sons Inc. Baker, S.B., Shaw M.C., (1987). Improving counseling through primary prevention. Ohio: Merrill Publishing Company. A Bell & Howell Company. Blissett, S.E., ve Mcgrath R.E,. (1996). The relationship between creativity & interpersonal problem solving skills in adults. Journal of Creative Behavior.30(3),173–182.
  4. Bingham, A. (1998). Çocuklarda problem çözme yeteneklerinin geliştirilmesi, (Çev. A. F. Oğuzhan), İstanbul:
  5. Milli Eğitim Basımevi. Çapri, B., ve Gökçakan, Z. (2008). Akılcı duygusal davranış terapisi (ADDT)'ne dayalı grupla psikolojik danışmanın üniversite öğrencilerinin problem çözme becerisi algısına etkisi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17(1),135–154.
  6. Erden, M., ve Akınan Y. (1985). Eğitim psikolojisi: Gelişim, öğrenme, öğretme. Ankara:Arkadaş Yayınları.
  7. Farrel, A.D., Meyer A.L., ve White K.S.(2001). Evaluating RIPP: A school based prevention program for reducing violence among urban adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child Pschology, 30(4), 451–463.
  8. Gelbal, S. (1991). Problem çözme becerisinin öğretimle geliştirilmesi. Eğitimde Arayışlar 1. Sempozyumu, Eğitimde Nitelik Geliştirme. İstanbul:
  9. Özel Kültür Yayınları.
  10. Güçlü, N. (2003) Lise müdürlerinin problem çözme becerileri. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, Sayı 160, 272-300.
  11. Gürcan-Namlu A. (2002). Teknoloji korkusu ve bunu etkileyen etmenler: Öğretmen adayları üzerine bir çalışma. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri. 2(1), 223–246.
  12. Heppner, P. P. (1978). A Review of the problem solving literature and it’s relationship to the counseling process, Journal of Counseling & Psychology, 25, 366–375.
  13. Heppner, P. P. ve Krauskopf, C. J. (1987). The integration of personal problem solving processes within counseling. The Counseling Psychologist, 15, 371–447.
  14. Heppner, P. P. (1978). A Review of the problem solving literature and it’s relationship to the couseling process. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 25 (5), 365–375.
  15. Heppner, P. P. ve Petersen, C. H. (1982). The development and implıcations of a personal problem solving inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology.