Journals / İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Constructivist Approach Opinion Scale for Pre Service Science Teachers: A Study of Validity and Reliability

Fen Öğretmen Adaylarına Yönelik Yapılandırmacı Yaklaşım Görüş Ölçeği: Bir Geçerlilik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Pages
79–92
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study highlights the importance of primary school science teachers who help students build up the knowledge as guides in the constructivist approach For this purpose a five point Likert type scale was developed to get the opinions of the pre service science teachers who will use constructivism in their classes 600 pre service science teachers from the faculty of education at ten different universities located different areas in Turkey have participated in the study and the data from 465 pre service teachers were taken into account excluding the empty and inconsistent items of the participants Expert opinions were taken for content validity; and item analysis factor analysis and the reliability analysis were conducted in the process of the development of the scale According to the results the scale has one factor structure and accounts for 51 18 of the total variance Internal consistency coefficient and half split reliability of the scale showed that this scale can be used for the future studies

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study highlights the importance of primary school science teachers who help students build up the knowledge as guides in the constructivist approach For this purpose a five point Likert type scale was developed to get the opinions of the pre service science teachers who will use constructivism in their classes 600 pre service science teachers from the faculty of education at ten different universities located different areas in Turkey have participated in the study and the data from 465 pre service teachers were taken into account excluding the empty and inconsistent items of the participants Expert opinions were taken for content validity; and item analysis factor analysis and the reliability analysis were conducted in the process of the development of the scale According to the results the scale has one factor structure and accounts for 51 18 of the total variance Internal consistency coefficient and half split reliability of the scale showed that this scale can be used for the future studies
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study highlights the importance of primary school science teachers who help students build up the knowledge as guides in the constructivist approach For this purpose a five point Likert type scale was developed to get the opinions of the pre service science teachers who will use constructivism in their classes 600 pre service science teachers from the faculty of education at ten different universities located different areas in Turkey have participated in the study and the data from 465 pre service teachers were taken into account excluding the empty and inconsistent items of the participants Expert opinions were taken for content validity; and item analysis factor analysis and the reliability analysis were conducted in the process of the development of the scale According to the results the scale has one factor structure and accounts for 51 18 of the total variance Internal consistency coefficient and half split reliability of the scale showed that this scale can be used for the future studies
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study highlights the importance of primary school science teachers who help students build up the knowledge as guides in the constructivist approach For this purpose a five point Likert type scale was developed to get the opinions of the pre service science teachers who will use constructivism in their classes 600 pre service science teachers from the faculty of education at ten different universities located different areas in Turkey have participated in the study and the data from 465 pre service teachers were taken into account excluding the empty and inconsistent items of the participants Expert opinions were taken for content validity; and item analysis factor analysis and the reliability analysis were conducted in the process of the development of the scale According to the results the scale has one factor structure and accounts for 51 18 of the total variance Internal consistency coefficient and half split reliability of the scale showed that this scale can be used for the future studies
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Fen öğretmen adayları · yapılandırmacı yaklasım ve geçerlilik-güvenirlik · Pre-service science teachers

Abstract

This study highlights the importance of primary school science teachers who help students build up the knowledge as guides in the constructivist approach For this purpose a five point Likert type scale was developed to get the opinions of the pre service science teachers who will use constructivism in their classes 600 pre service science teachers from the faculty of education at ten different universities located different areas in Turkey have participated in the study and the data from 465 pre service teachers were taken into account excluding the empty and inconsistent items of the participants Expert opinions were taken for content validity; and item analysis factor analysis and the reliability analysis were conducted in the process of the development of the scale According to the results the scale has one factor structure and accounts for 51 18 of the total variance Internal consistency coefficient and half split reliability of the scale showed that this scale can be used for the future studies

Özet

Bu çalışmada; yapılandırmacı yaklaşımda bir yönlendirici konumunda bulunan ve öğrencilerin bilgileri yapılandırmasında onlara yol gösteren öğretmenlerin önemi üzerinde durulmuştur. Bu amaçla ilerideki yaşantılarında yapılandırmacı yaklaşımı sınıflarında uygulayacak olan öğretmen adaylarının bu yaklaşıma yönelik görüşlerinin belirlenmesi amacıyla bir ölçek geliştirme çalışmasına yer verilmiştir. Türkiye’nin farklı bölgelerinde yer alan 10 üniversitenin eğitim fakültelerinden 600 öğretmen adayının katıldığı bu çalışmanın analizleri, bazı öğretmen adaylarının verdiği cevaplar arasındaki tutarsızlık ve boş bırakılan maddeler göz önüne alınarak 465 kişi üzerinden değerlendirilmiştir. Ölçeğin geliştirilme sürecinde kapsam geçerliliği için uzman görüşüne, madde analizine, faktör analizine ve güvenirlik sürecine yer verilmiştir. Analizler doğrultusunda ölçeğin tek faktörden meydana geldiği ve toplam varyansın yaklaşık % 51.18’ini açıkladığı belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca ölçeğe ilişkin Cronbach Alpha güvenirlik katsayısı “.97”; testi yarılama güvenirlik katsayısı ise “.93” olarak hesaplanmıştır. Ölçeğin bu özellikleri göz önüne alındığında, ileride bu alanda yapılacak olan çalışmalarda kullanılabileceği düşünülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

EVREKLİ, E., BALIM, A. G., İNEL, D., KESERCİOĞLU, T. (2022). Constructivist Approach Opinion Scale for Pre Service Science Teachers: A Study of Validity and Reliability. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 79–92. https://ajindex.com/articles/547618

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., Taylor, P. C. ve Chen, C. C. (2000). Constructivist Learning Environments in a Cross-National Study in Taiwan and Australia. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 37-55.
  2. Ang, R. P. ve Huan, V. S. (2006). Academic Expectations Stress Inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 522-539.
  3. Bagner, D. M., Storch, E. A. ve Roberti, J. W. (2004). A Factor Analytic Study of the Loneliness and Social Dissatisfaction Scale in a Sample of African-American and Hispanic-American Children. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 34(3), 237-250.
  4. Balcı, A. (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma. Ankara:
  5. PegemA Yayıncılık. Brooks, J. G. ve Brooks, M. G. (1993). In Search for Understanding the Case for Constructivist Classrooms. Alexandria, Virginia: ASCD. Bulduk, S. (2003). Psikolojide Deneysel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Đstanbul: Çantay Kitabevi.
  6. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2006). Sosyal Bilimler için Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara:
  7. PegemA Yayıncılık Chen, W., Burry-Stock, J. A. ve Rovegno, I. (2000). Self-Evaluation of Expertise in Teaching Elementary Physical Education from Constructivist Perspectives. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14(1), 25-45.
  8. Çepni, S. (2007). Araştırma ve Proje Çalışmalarına Giriş. Trabzon: Celepler Matbaacılık. Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Wolfhagen, H. A. P., Scherpbier, A. J. J. A. ve Van Der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2003). Development of an Instrument to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Teachers in Guiding Small Groups. Higher Education, 46, 431-446.
  9. Dolmans, D. H. J. M. ve Ginns, P. (2005). A Short Questionnaire to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Tutors in PBL: Validity and Reliability. Medical Teacher, 27(6), 534-538.
  10. Dorman, J. P. ve Knightley, W. M. (2006). Development and Validation of an Instrument to Assess Secondary School Students’ Perceptions of Academic Tasks. Educational Studies, 32(1), 47-58.
  11. Geuens, M. ve Pelsmacker, P. D. (2002). Validity and Reliability of Scores on the Reduced Emotional Intensity Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(2), 299-315.
  12. Gijbels, D., Watering, G. V. D., Dochy, F. ve Bossche, P. V. D. (2006). New Learning Environments and Constructivism: The Students’ Perspective. Instructional Science, 34. 213-226. Gil-Pérez, D., Guisasola, J., Moreno, A., Cachapuz, A., De Carvalio, A. M. P., Torregrosa, J. ve diğerleri. (2002). Defending Constructivism in Science Education. Science and Education, 11, 557-571.
  13. Henson, R. K. ve Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of Explorato