Journals / İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

Teachers? and Students? Opinions about CursiveHandwriting

Öğretmen ve Öğrencilerin Bitişik Eğik Yazı ile İlgili Görüşleri

Pages
69–92
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The purpose of this study is to identify the opinions of the fourth grade students who started the first grade with cursive handwriting and their primary school teachers and branch teachers about handwriting This is a qualitative study The research was done in one of the primary schools in Denizli during the first semester of 2008 2009 education year In this study convenience sampling method which was one of the purposive sampling methods was used The sample was branch teachers n=9 and primary school teachers n=10 and fourth grade students n=41 In the research interview one of the qualitative research data collection technique was used Students commonly think that writing is an obligation Both teachers and students name cursive and manuscript handwriting in different ways Teachers support the idea of starting the first grade with manuscript handwriting

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to identify the opinions of the fourth grade students who started the first grade with cursive handwriting and their primary school teachers and branch teachers about handwriting This is a qualitative study The research was done in one of the primary schools in Denizli during the first semester of 2008 2009 education year In this study convenience sampling method which was one of the purposive sampling methods was used The sample was branch teachers n=9 and primary school teachers n=10 and fourth grade students n=41 In the research interview one of the qualitative research data collection technique was used Students commonly think that writing is an obligation Both teachers and students name cursive and manuscript handwriting in different ways Teachers support the idea of starting the first grade with manuscript handwriting
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of this study is to identify the opinions of the fourth grade students who started the first grade with cursive handwriting and their primary school teachers and branch teachers about handwriting This is a qualitative study The research was done in one of the primary schools in Denizli during the first semester of 2008 2009 education year In this study convenience sampling method which was one of the purposive sampling methods was used The sample was branch teachers n=9 and primary school teachers n=10 and fourth grade students n=41 In the research interview one of the qualitative research data collection technique was used Students commonly think that writing is an obligation Both teachers and students name cursive and manuscript handwriting in different ways Teachers support the idea of starting the first grade with manuscript handwriting
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The purpose of this study is to identify the opinions of the fourth grade students who started the first grade with cursive handwriting and their primary school teachers and branch teachers about handwriting This is a qualitative study The research was done in one of the primary schools in Denizli during the first semester of 2008 2009 education year In this study convenience sampling method which was one of the purposive sampling methods was used The sample was branch teachers n=9 and primary school teachers n=10 and fourth grade students n=41 In the research interview one of the qualitative research data collection technique was used Students commonly think that writing is an obligation Both teachers and students name cursive and manuscript handwriting in different ways Teachers support the idea of starting the first grade with manuscript handwriting
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Yazı biçimleri · yazı öğretimi · bitişik eğik yazı

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify the opinions of the fourth grade students who started the first grade with cursive handwriting and their primary school teachers and branch teachers about handwriting This is a qualitative study The research was done in one of the primary schools in Denizli during the first semester of 2008 2009 education year In this study convenience sampling method which was one of the purposive sampling methods was used The sample was branch teachers n=9 and primary school teachers n=10 and fourth grade students n=41 In the research interview one of the qualitative research data collection technique was used Students commonly think that writing is an obligation Both teachers and students name cursive and manuscript handwriting in different ways Teachers support the idea of starting the first grade with manuscript handwriting

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı ilk kez birinci sınıfa bitişik eğik yazıyla başlayan dördüncü sınıf öğrencileri ile okulda görev yapan sınıf ve branş öğretmenlerinin yazı biçimleri ile ilgili görüşlerini belirlemektir. Tarama modelinde nitel bir çalışmadır. Araştırma 2008-2009 eğitim- öğretim yılı birinci döneminde Denizli ili ilköğretim okullarından birinde uygulanmıştır. Araştırmada amaçlı örnekleme çeşitlerinden biri olan kolay ulaşılabilir durum örneklemesi kullanılmıştır. İlköğretim okulu branş (n=9) ve sınıf öğretmenleri (n=10) ile dördüncü sınıf öğrencileri (n=41) araştırmanın örneklemidir. Araştırmada, nitel araştırma veri toplama yöntemlerinden, görüşme kullanılmıştır. Öğretmen ve öğrenciler genel olarak yazı yazmayı bir zorunluluk olarak görmektedir. Öğrenciler bitişik eğik ve dik temel yazıyı farklı şekillerde adlandırmaktadır. Öğretmenler birinci sınıfta dik temel yazı ile başlanması gerektiğini savunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ILGIN, H., ARSLAN, D. (2022). Teachers? and Students? Opinions about CursiveHandwriting. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 69–92. https://ajindex.com/articles/547592

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Acat, B., Özsoy, U.(2006). Ses Temelli Cümle Yöntemiyle İlkokuma-Yazma Öğretiminde Karşılaşılan Güçlükler. Ulusal Sınıf Öğretmenliği Kongresi Gazi Üniversitesi. Ankara:Kök Yayıncılık, Bildiri Kitabı 1. Cilt. Adams, M. J. (1994). Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning about Print. MIT Press.
  2. Akyol, H. (2005). Türkçe İlkokuma Yazma Öğretimi. 4. Baskı. Ankara:
  3. PegemA Yayıncılık. Akyol, H.(2006). Türkçe Öğretim Yöntemleri. Ankara:
  4. Kök Yayıncılık. Başaran, M.(2006). İlkokuma Yazma Öğretimi Sürecinde Öğrencilerin Yaptıkları Yazım Yanlışları. Ulusal Sınıf Öğretmenliği Kongresi Gazi Üniversitesi. Ankara:
  5. Kök Yayıncılık, Bildiri Kitabı 1.Cilt. Bayraktar, Ö. (2006). İlköğretim Birinci Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Bitişik Eğik Yazıda Yaptıkları Hatalar, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim BilimleriEnstitüsü. Bektaş, A.(2007). Ses Temelli Cümle Yöntemiyle Gerçekleştirilen İlk Okuma-Yazma Öğretiminin Değerlendirilmesi, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Çevik, S. O. (2006). Birinci Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin İlkokuma Yazma Öğretiminde Ses Temelli Cümle Yöntemine İlişkin Görüşleri (Bursa İli Örneği), Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Doğan, B. (2007). Denizli İli İlköğretim Okullarında Çalışan Birinci Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Ses Temelli Cümle Yöntemine İlişkin Görüşleri. AİBÜ Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1). 21.04.2009 tarihinde [Online]:http:// www. efdergi. ibu.edu.tr. adresinden indirilmiştir. Durukan, E., Alver, M. (2008). Ses Temelli Cümle Yönteminin Öğretmen Görüşlerine Göre Değerlendirilmesi. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1(5). Engin, G. (2006). İlkokuma Yazma Öğretimi Uygulamalarında Öğretmen Görüşleri ve Yaşanan Sorunlar. Ulusal Sınıf Öğretmenliği Kongresi Gazi Üniversitesi.Ankara:
  6. Kök Yayıncılık, Bildiri Kitabı 2. Cilt. Feder, K., Majnemer, A. ( 2007). Handwriting development, competency, and intervention. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 49, 312–317.
  7. Graham, S., Harris, K. R., Mason, L., Fink-Chorzempa, B., Moran S. ve Saddler, B. (2008). How do primary grade teachers teach handwriting? A national survey. ReadWrit., 21, 49-69.
  8. Graham, S., Weintraub, N. ve Berninger, V. W.(1998). The Relationship Between Handwriting Style and Speed and Legibility. The Journal of Educational Research, 91(5), 290-296.
  9. Graham, S., Berninger, V., Weintraub, N. ve Schafer, W. (1998). Development of Handwriting Speed and Legibility in Grades 1-9. The Journal