SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3

Technology Leadership Competencies Scale for Educational Administrators: Development, Validity and Reliability Study

"Eğitim Yöneticilerinin Teknoloji Liderliği Yeterlikleri Ölçeğinin" Geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Köksal BANOĞLU
Pages
43–65
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed that the measurement model accounted for 65.35% of total variance and factor loadings ranged between .522 and .838 (KMO=.899, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this paper is to develop a multiple item scale for measuring technology leadership competencies of educational administrators.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The population of the study was formed by 127 school principals in Maltepe and Kadikoy districts in Istanbul.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed that the measurement model accounted for 65.35% of total variance and factor loadings ranged between .522 and .838 (KMO=.899, p
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to develop a multiple item scale for measuring technology leadership competencies of educational administrators. The population of the study was formed by 127 school principals in Maltepe and Kadikoy districts in Istanbul. To obtain content validity, expert panel was made of 6 academics and 1 local information and computer technologies (ICT) coordinator and experts reviewed and rated the 56-items draft scale in terms of the relevance of each item with respect to study purpose (CVI=0.708). The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed that the measurement model accounted for 65.35% of total variance and factor loadings ranged between .522 and .838 (KMO=.899, p

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı eğitim yöneticilerinin sahip olduğu teknoloji liderliği yeterliklerini ölçen geçerli vegüvenilir bir ölçme aracı geliştirmektir. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu İstanbul'un Maltepe ve Kadıköyilçelerinde görev yapan 127 okul müdürü oluşturmaktadır. Açımlayıcı faktör analizi (AFA) sonuçları ölçmearacının toplam varyansın %65.35'ini açıkladığını ve madde faktör yüklerinin .522 ile .838 arasındadeğiştiğini göstermiştir (KMO=.899, p

🔖

Cite This Article

BANOĞLU, K. (2022). Technology Leadership Competencies Scale for Educational Administrators: Development, Validity and Reliability Study. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3, 43–65. https://ajindex.com/articles/547563

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Afshari, M., Kamariah, Abu Bakar, K., Su Luan, W., Say Fooi, F., & Abu Samah, B. (2009).
  2. Competency, Leadership and Technology Use by Principals. International Journal of Learning, 16(3), 345-357.
  3. Akbaba-Altun, S. (2002). Okul yöneticilerinin teknolojiye karşı tutumlarının incelenmesi. Çağdaş Eğitim, 286, 8-14.
  4. Ayşin-Altun, N. (2009). İlköğretim okul yöneticilerinin bilişim teknolojilerinin eğitim amaçlı kullanımına etkisi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  5. Anderson, R. E. (2008). Implications of the information and knowledge society for education. (Eds) J. Voogt & G. Knezek, International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education, 5-22.
  6. Anderson, R.E., & Dexter, S. (2005). School technology leadership: An emprical investigation of prevalence and effect. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(1), 49-82.
  7. Bailey, G.D. (1997). What technology leaders need to know: The essential top 10 concepts for technology integration in the 21th century. Learning and Leading with Technology, 25(1), 57-62.
  8. Banoğlu, K. (2011). School principals' technology leadership competency and technology coordinatorship. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 11(1), 208-213.
  9. Billheimer, D.M. (2007). A study of West Virginia principals: Technology standards, professional development, and effective instructional technology leaders. Unpublished Doctorate Dissertation, Marshall University, College of Education and Human Services. Brooks-Young, S. (2009). Making technology standards work for you. WA: International Society for Technology in Education. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara:
  10. PegemA Yayıncılık. Can, T. (2003). Bolu orta öğretim okulları yöneticilerinin teknolojik liderlik yeterlilikleri. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(3), 94- 107. Can, T. (2008). İlköğretim okulları yöneticilerinin teknolojik liderlik yeterlilikleri. 8.Uluslar arası Eğitim Teknolojileri Konferansı, 1053-1057. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi.
  11. ChanLin, L.J., Hong, J.C., Horng, J.S., Chang, S.H., & Chu, H.C. (2006). Factors influencing technology integration in teaching-a Taiwanese perspective. Innovations in Education and Training International, 43 (1), 57-68.
  12. Davies, P.M. (2010). On school educational technology leadership. Management in Education, 24(2), 55-61.
  13. David, P. A. & Foray, D. (2003). Economic fundamentals of the knowledge society. Policy Futures in Educati