The purpose of this research was to determine university instructors rsquo; in class teaching skills based on students rsquo; views This descriptive research was based on screening model The working group of the study was consisted of 800 students studying at various departments of Kilis 7 Aralik University and University of Gaziantep in the academic year of 2009 2010 A questionnaire developed by the authors was used to gather the data Arithmetic mean standard deviation t test and analysis of variance were calculated to analyze the data According to the results the students think that half of the teaching staff were sufficient enough about quot;subject area knowledge quot; quot;the ability to use teaching strategies methods and techniques rdquo; ldquo;the skills of teaching materials rdquo; quot;communication skills quot; quot;classroom management skills quot; and quot;assessment skills quot; It was also found that the students rsquo; views significantly differed according to ldquo;gender rdquo; ldquo;department rdquo; and ldquo;major rdquo; variables
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this research was to determine university instructors rsquo; in class teaching skills based on students rsquo; views This descriptive research was based on screening model The working group of the study was consisted of 800 students studying at various departments of Kilis 7 Aralik University and University of Gaziantep in the academic year of 2009 2010 A questionnaire developed by the authors was used to gather the data Arithmetic mean standard deviation t test and analysis of variance were calculated to analyze the data According to the results the students think that half of the teaching staff were sufficient enough about quot;subject area knowledge quot; quot;the ability to use teaching strategies methods and techniques rdquo; ldquo;the skills of teaching materials rdquo; quot;communication skills quot; quot;classroom management skills quot; and quot;assessment skills quot; It was also found that the students rsquo; views significantly differed according to ldquo;gender rdquo; ldquo;department rdquo; and ldquo;major rdquo; variables
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of this research was to determine university instructors rsquo; in class teaching skills based on students rsquo; views This descriptive research was based on screening model The working group of the study was consisted of 800 students studying at various departments of Kilis 7 Aralik University and University of Gaziantep in the academic year of 2009 2010 A questionnaire developed by the authors was used to gather the data Arithmetic mean standard deviation t test and analysis of variance were calculated to analyze the data According to the results the students think that half of the teaching staff were sufficient enough about quot;subject area knowledge quot; quot;the ability to use teaching strategies methods and techniques rdquo; ldquo;the skills of teaching materials rdquo; quot;communication skills quot; quot;classroom management skills quot; and quot;assessment skills quot; It was also found that the students rsquo; views significantly differed according to ldquo;gender rdquo; ldquo;department rdquo; and ldquo;major rdquo; variables
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The purpose of this research was to determine university instructors rsquo; in class teaching skills based on students rsquo; views This descriptive research was based on screening model The working group of the study was consisted of 800 students studying at various departments of Kilis 7 Aralik University and University of Gaziantep in the academic year of 2009 2010 A questionnaire developed by the authors was used to gather the data Arithmetic mean standard deviation t test and analysis of variance were calculated to analyze the data According to the results the students think that half of the teaching staff were sufficient enough about quot;subject area knowledge quot; quot;the ability to use teaching strategies methods and techniques rdquo; ldquo;the skills of teaching materials rdquo; quot;communication skills quot; quot;classroom management skills quot; and quot;assessment skills quot; It was also found that the students rsquo; views significantly differed according to ldquo;gender rdquo; ldquo;department rdquo; and ldquo;major rdquo; variables
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Yükseköğretim · Üniversite Öğretim Elemanları · Sınıf İçi Öğretim Becerileri
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to determine university instructors rsquo; in class teaching skills based on students rsquo; views This descriptive research was based on screening model The working group of the study was consisted of 800 students studying at various departments of Kilis 7 Aralik University and University of Gaziantep in the academic year of 2009 2010 A questionnaire developed by the authors was used to gather the data Arithmetic mean standard deviation t test and analysis of variance were calculated to analyze the data According to the results the students think that half of the teaching staff were sufficient enough about quot;subject area knowledge quot; quot;the ability to use teaching strategies methods and techniques rdquo; ldquo;the skills of teaching materials rdquo; quot;communication skills quot; quot;classroom management skills quot; and quot;assessment skills quot; It was also found that the students rsquo; views significantly differed according to ldquo;gender rdquo; ldquo;department rdquo; and ldquo;major rdquo; variables
Özet
Bu araştırmanın amacı nbsp; yükseköğretimde görev yapan öğretim elemanlarının sınıf içi öğretim becerilerinin ne düzeyde olduğunun öğrenci görüşlerine göre belirlenmesidir Araştırma betimsel nitelikte olup tarama modeline dayalıdır Araştırmada çalışma grubunu 2009 ndash;2010 öğretim yılında Kilis 7 Aralık Üniversitesi ve Gaziantep Üniversitesinin çeşitli fakültelerinde okuyan 800 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen anket kullanılmıştır Verilerin analizinde aritmetik ortalama standart sapma ldquo;t rdquo; testi varyans analizi tekniklerinden yararlanılmıştır Araştırmada ulaşılan sonuçlardan bazıları şunlardır: üniversite öğrencileri öğretim elemanlarının yarısını ldquo;konu alanı bilgisi rdquo; ldquo;öğretim strateji yöntem ve tekniklerini kullanma becerisi rdquo; ldquo;öğretim araç gereçlerini kullanma becerisi rdquo; ldquo;iletişim becerisi rdquo; nbsp; ldquo;sınıf yönetimi becerisi rdquo; ve ldquo;ölçme değerlendirme becerisi rdquo; açısından yeterli görmemektedirler Öğrenci görüşlerinin ldquo;cinsiyet rdquo; ldquo;fakülte rdquo; ve ldquo;alan rdquo; değişkeni açısından anlamlı farklılık gösterdiği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır
CİNOĞLU, M., ARSLANTAŞ, H. İ., YILDIZ, M. A. (2022). Evaluation of University Instructors? In class Teaching Skills According to Students? Views. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3, 67–90. https://ajindex.com/articles/547553
Açıkgöz Ün, K. (1992). İşbirlikçi Öğrenme Kuram Araştırma Uygulama. Malatya: Uğurel Matbaası. Aksu, M.B., Çivitçi, A., Duy, B. (2008). Yükseköğretim Öğrencilerinin Öğretim Elemanlarının Ders Uygulamaları ve Sınıf İçi Davranışlarına İlişkin Görüşleri. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9 (16), ss. 17–42.
Aydın, A.(1998). Sınıf Yönetimi. Ankara:
Anı Yayıncılık. Balcı, A.(1998). Etkili okul. Eğitim ve Bilim, 12, 70, ss. 21-30.
Bozdoğan, Z.(2004). Etkili Öğretmenlik Eğitimi. Ankara:
Nobel yayınları. Can, N.(1998). Öğretmen ve Yöneticinin Etkililiğinin Öğretimdeki Rolü. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 4(13), ss.57-64.
Çakmak, M., Kayabaşı Y. ve Ercan, L.(2008). Öğretmen Adaylarının Sınıf Yönetimi Stratejilerine Yönelik Görüşleri. H. Ü. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 35, ss.53-64
Ergün, M.(2001). Üniversitelerde Öğretim Etkinliğinin Geliştirilmesi. 2000 Yılında Türk Milli Eğitim Örgütü ve Yönetimi Ulusal Sempozyumu, Öğretmen Hüseyin Hüsnü Tekışık Eğitim Araştırma Geliştirme Vakfı yay. 188-192. 1113 Ocak 2001,
Ankara.
Gardner, J. W. (1990). Yenilikçi Birey ve Zinde Toplum.(Çeviri: San Özalp ve Hikmet Seçim). İstanbul:
İlgi Yayıncılık. Macrae, S. (1998) “ Classroom management and Organization”, becoming a teacher (Ed.) Justin dillion. M. Maguire. Open University Pres, New York,128-140.
Köktaş, K. Ş. (2003). Sınıf Yönetimi. Adana:Nobel yayınları. Köseoğlu, K. (1994). İlköğretime öğretmen yetiştiren kurumlarda öğretim elemanı yeterliliklerinin öğrenci görüşlerine göre değerlendirilmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Murat, M., Aarslantaş H.İ.ve Özgan, (2006). Öğretim Elemanlarının Sınıf İçi EğitimÖğretim Etkinlikleri Açısından Değerlendirilmesi. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 26(3), ss. 263-278
Sağlam, A.Ç. ve Sağlam, M.(2004). Öğretmenlik Uygulaması ve Okul Deneyimi Derslerinin Yürütülmesinde Karşılaşılan Sorunlar ve Çözüm Önerileri. Çağdaş Eğitim Dergisi, 305, ss.18-25.
Stanton, H. (1985). What makes a good teacher? Education nevs, Australian education index,19. Sünbül, A.M.(1996). Öğretmen Niteliği ve Öğretimdeki Rolleri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 8(3), ss. 597-608.
Şen, H.Ş. ve Erişen Y. (2002). Öğretmen Yetiştiren Kurumlarda Öğretim Elemanlarının Etkili Öğretmenlik Özellikleri. G.Ü. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22 (1), ss.99-116.
Tan, Ş. (2005). Öğretimi Planlama ve Değerlendirme. (9.Baskı) Ankara: