Journals / İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

Solution Strategies of a Teacher Candidate: Rediscovering Numbers in Base Eight

Bir Öğretmen Adayının Çözüm Stratejileri: Sayıları Sekizlik Tabanda Yeniden Keşfetme

Pages
199–216
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results reveal that using different base supports preservice teachers to change their thinking style and interpret the problems from a different perspective without doing any memorization.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Up to today, many of the studies mostly investigated students' understanding of natural numbers rather than preservice teachers’.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This way, preservice teachers had a chance to develop different strategies for the operations that they memorized in base ten and their thinking ways are investigated during the solution of operations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results reveal that using different base supports preservice teachers to change their thinking style and interpret the problems from a different perspective without doing any memorization.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:doğal sayılar · öğretmen adayları · sekizlik taban

Abstract

Up to today, many of the studies mostly investigated students' understanding of natural numbers rather than preservice teachers’. This study conducts a case study in order to investigate a preservice teacher's understanding of natural numbers and operations on them. The preservice teachers, who were enrolled in a senior year course in an elementary mathematics education department, used materials for natural numbers that aimed to teach the concepts and operations using base eight instead of customarily used base ten for a period. This way, preservice teachers had a chance to develop different strategies for the operations that they memorized in base ten and their thinking ways are investigated during the solution of operations. The results reveal that using different base supports preservice teachers to change their thinking style and interpret the problems from a different perspective without doing any memorization.

Özet

Bugüne kadar yapılan çalışmalar çoğunlukla öğrencilerin doğal sayıları nasıl anladıklarını incelemiş fakat öğretmen adaylarının doğal sayıları nasıl anladıkları ve öğrettikleri üzerine yeterince yoğunlaşmamıştır. Bu çalışmada öğretmen adaylarının doğal sayılar kavramını ve doğal sayılardaki işlemleri nasıl anladığını araştırmak için bir durum çalışması yapılmıştır. Çalışmada ilköğretim matematik eğitimi bölümünde okuyan öğretmen adayları, 4. sınıf zorunlu ders kapsamında doğal sayılar ve doğal sayılar üzerindeki işlemleri onluk taban yerine sekizlik tabanda hazırlanan içerik ile işlemiştir. Böylece öğretmen adaylarına onluk tabanda ezbere yaptığı birçok işlem için stratejiler geliştirme fırsatı verilmiş ve bu süreçte nasıl düşündükleri detaylı olarak araştırılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonucu farklı bir taban kullanmanın öğretmen adaylarının düşünce şeklini değiştirdiğini, ezberden çıkarak farklı bir bakış açısıyla soruları yorumladıklarını göstermektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

AKYÜZ, D. (2022). Solution Strategies of a Teacher Candidate: Rediscovering Numbers in Base Eight. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 199–216. https://ajindex.com/articles/547516

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Andreasen, J. B. (2006). Classroom mathematical practices in a preservice elementary mathematics education course using an instructional sequence related to place value and operations. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Central Florida. Ashlock, R. B. (2002). Error patterns in computation: Using error patterns to improve instruction (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall. Ball, D., Bass, H., & Hill, H. (2004). Knowing and using mathematical knowledge in teaching: Learning what matters. In Proceedings for the 12th Annual Conference of the South African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. Durban. SAARMSTE. Cobb, P. (2001). Supporting the improvement of learning and teaching in social and institutional context. Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress, 455-47.
  2. Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1996). Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research. Educational psychologist, 31(3-4), 175-190.
  3. Conner, A. (2007). Student teachers' conceptions of proof and facilitation of argumentation in secondary mathematics classrooms. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, PA. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Ansell, E., & Behrend, J. (1998). Understanding teachers' self-sustaining, generative change in the context of professional development1. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(1), 67-80.
  4. Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 1, 371-404.
  5. Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American educational research journal, 42(2), 371-406.
  6. Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.) (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
  7. Lerman, S. (2000). A case of interpretations of social: A response to Steffe and Thompson. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), 210-227.
  8. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers' understanding of fundamental mathematics in