Journals / İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3

Educational Advantages and Disadvantages of Computer-Assisted Instruction: Commentary on Paper by Foster et al.

Pages
297–304
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(3), 206-232.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper is a peer commentary on Foster, M.
📊
Key Findings & Data:H., Sarama, J., & Williams, J.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(3), 206-232.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Bilgisayar destekli öğretim · Matematik eğitimi · Risk altındaki öğrenciler

Abstract

This paper is a peer commentary on Foster, M. E., Anthony, J. L., Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., & Williams, J. M. (2016). Improving mathematics learning of kindergarten students through computer-assisted instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(3), 206-232.

🔖

Cite This Article

UYSAL, Ş. (2022). Educational Advantages and Disadvantages of Computer-Assisted Instruction: Commentary on Paper by Foster et al.. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3, 297–304. https://ajindex.com/articles/547505

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms, 1880-1990 (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  2. Foster, M. E., Anthony, J. L., Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., & Williams, J. M. (2016). Improving mathematics learning of kindergarten students through computer-assisted instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(3), 206-232.
  3. Fried, C. B. (2008). In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning. Computers & Education, 50(3), 906-914.
  4. Strauss, V. (2013, October 16). Howard Gardner: ‘Multiple intelligences’ are not ‘learning styles’. The Washington Post. Hartas, D. (2011). Families’ social backgrounds matter: Socio-economic factors, home learning and young children’s language, literacy and social outcomes. British Educational Research Journal, 37(6), 893-914.
  5. Kitchen, R. S., & Berk, S. (2016). Educational technology: An equity challenge to the Common Core. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(1), 3-16.
  6. Mitra, S. (2007, February). Sugata Mitra: Kids can teach themselves [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/sugata_mitra_shows_how_kids_teach_themselves
  7. Ritzhaupt, A., Feng, L., Dawson, K., & Barron, A. (2013). Differences in student information and communication technology literacy based on socio-economic status, ethnicity, and gender: Evidence of a digital divide in Florida schools. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(4), 291-307.
  8. Schacter, J., & Jo, B. (2016). Improving low-income preschoolers mathematics achievement with Math Shelf, a preschool tablet computer curriculum. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 223-229.
  9. Spitzer, M. (2014). Information technology in education: Risks and side effects. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 3(3-4), 81-85.
  10. Ulker, R., Yilmaz, Z., Solak, A., & Erguder, L. (2013). Classroom environment: What does students’ drawings tell? Anthropologist, 16(1-2), 209-215.