SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

Assessment of the Attitudes of Classroom Teachers and Preschool Teachers towards Students from Different Ethnic Origins and Socioeconomic Segments in terms of Occupational Ethics1

Elif Mercan UZUN
Eda Bütün KAR
Pages
73–75
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the study, it was concluded that, when considered from the aspect of the codes of occupational ethics, the teachers experience dilemma most frequently in terms of equality, objectivity, and fairness codes

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it was aimed to examine the attitudes of classroom teachers and preschool teachers towards their students from different ethnic origins and socioeconomic segments in terms of the occupational ethics in detail.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The occupational experience of teachers varies between 8 and 30 years; seven of them were working at village schools, while eighteen of them were working in schools located in city center.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the study, it was concluded that, when considered from the aspect of the codes of occupational ethics, the teachers experience dilemma most frequently in terms of equality, objectivity, and fairness codes
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to examine the attitudes of classroom teachers and preschool teachers towards their students from different ethnic origins and socioeconomic segments in terms of the occupational ethics in detail. The participants of this study were working at the schools located in different regions of Samsun. Four of the teachers were preschool teachers, while eleven of the teachers were elementary school teachers. The occupational experience of teachers varies between 8 and 30 years; seven of them were working at village schools, while eighteen of them were working in schools located in city center. In the research, phenomenology, one of the qualitative research methods, was used. In order to determine the attitudes of teachers towards the students from different ethnic origins and socioeconomic segments, semi-structured interview method was employed. The interviews took approx. 30-50 minutes. The data obtained in this study were analyzed using descriptive analysis method. As a result of the study, it was concluded that, when considered from the aspect of the codes of occupational ethics, the teachers experience dilemma most frequently in terms of equality, objectivity, and fairness codes

🔖

Cite This Article

UZUN, E. M., KAR, E. B. (2022). Assessment of the Attitudes of Classroom Teachers and Preschool Teachers towards Students from Different Ethnic Origins and Socioeconomic Segments in terms of Occupational Ethics1. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 73–75. https://ajindex.com/articles/547475

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Acar, A, G. (2000). Etik değerlerin kurumsallaştırılması üzerine bir araştırma. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Altunışık, R., Çoşkun, R., Yıldırım, E. ve Bayraktaroğlu, S. (2010). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Sakarya: Sakarya Kitabevi.
  2. Archer, L. (2003) Race, masculinity and schooling: Muslim boys and education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  3. Archer, L. & Francis, B. (2003). They never rails like the other ethnic gruops’: Teachers’ constructions of British Chinese pupils’ gender identities and approaches to learning. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(2), 165-182.
  4. A ydın, İ. (2006). Eğitim ve öğretimde etik (2. Baskı). Ankara:
  5. Pegem A Yayıncılık. Bektaş, Ç. ve Köseoğlu, M. A. (2008). İş etiği ve iş etiğinin yayılım süreci. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 13, 128-145.
  6. Bergh, L., Denessen, E., Hornstra, L., Voeten, M., Holland, R. W. (2010). The implicit prejudice attitudes of teachers, relations to teacher expectations and the ethnic achievement gap. American Educational Gap, 47(2), 497-527.
  7. Cemaloğlu, N. veKılınç, A. Ç. (2012). İlköğretim okulu yöneticilerinin etik liderlik davranışları ile öğretmenlerin algıladıkları örgütsel güven ve yıldırma arasındaki ilişki. Eğitim ve Bilim, 37(165), 137-151.
  8. Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R. B., & Turner, L. A. (2015). Araştırma yöntemleri desen ve analiz. Ankara:
  9. Anı Yayıncılık. Colnerud, G. (1997). Ethical conflict in teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(6), 627-635.
  10. Colnerud, G. (2006). Teacher ethics as a research problem: Syntheses achieved and new issues. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 12(3), 365-385.
  11. Dolmacı, N.ve Bulgan, G. (2013). Turizm etiği kapsamında çevresel duyarlılık. Journal of Yasar University, 29(9), 4853-4870.
  12. Durkheim, E. (1962). Meslek ahlakı. İstanbul:
  13. Milli Eğitim Basımevi. Elashoff, J. D.,& Snow, R. E. (1971).
  14. Pygmalion reconsidered. Worthington, OH: Charles A. Jones. Fenstermacher, G. D. (2001). On the concept of manner and its visibility in teaching practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33, 639-653.
  15. Ghaffarzadeh, M. (2016). A comparative study of discrimination in education: The learning Environment and behaviours of students and teachers in Iran. The IAFOR Jornal of Education, 4(2), 34-46.
  16. Gözütok, D. (1999). Öğretmenlerin etik davranışları. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi. 32 (1), 83-99.
  17. Güler, A., Halıcıoğlu, M. B. ve Taşğın, S. (2015). Sosyal b