SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

Self-Efficacy Perception Levels of Prospective Classroom Teachers toward Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge

Mehmet Nuri GÖMLEKSİZ
Emine Kübra FİDAN
Pages
87–114
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

But their self-efficacy perception levels did not differ in terms of university variable.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to assess self-efficacy perception levels of prospective classroom teachers toward technological pedagogical content knowledge.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Study group consisted of classroom prospective teachers enrolled at Fırat, Cumhuriyet, Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen, Erciyes, Erzincan, Karadeniz Technic and Adıyaman Universities in 2011-2012 academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:But their self-efficacy perception levels did not differ in terms of university variable.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011-2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess self-efficacy perception levels of prospective classroom teachers toward technological pedagogical content knowledge. Study group consisted of classroom prospective teachers enrolled at Fırat, Cumhuriyet, Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen, Erciyes, Erzincan, Karadeniz Technic and Adıyaman Universities in 2011-2012 academic year. Web Pedagogical Content Knowledge scale, developed by Schmidt and others (2009) and adapted into Turkish by Öztürk and Horzum (2011) was used as the data collection tool in the study. The scale was administered on 628 (349 female and 279 male) prospective teachers. Independent groups t test and one way ANOVA were used to analyze the data. Research results reveal that prospective classroom teachers' self-efficacy perception levels toward technological pedagogical content knowledge differed in terms of gender. But their self-efficacy perception levels did not differ in terms of university variable.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖMLEKSİZ, M. N., FİDAN, E. K. (2022). Self-Efficacy Perception Levels of Prospective Classroom Teachers toward Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 87–114. https://ajindex.com/articles/547433

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aladağ, C., & Doğu, S. (2009). Fen ve teknoloji dersinde verilen ödevlerin öğrencigörüşlerine gore değerlendirilmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler EnstitüsüDergisi, 21, 15-23.
  2. Alexander, M., Bartlett, J. E., Truell, A. D., & Ouwenga, K. (2001). Testing in a computertechnology course: An investigation of equivalency in performance between onlineand paper and pencil methods. Journal of Career and Technical Education,18(1), 69-80.
  3. Bauer, W., Benonson, W., & Westfall, G. D. (1992).
  4. Multimedia Physics, CDROM. Bartlett, J. E., II, Reynolds, K A., & Alexander, M. W. (2000). A tool for online learning.Journal of Online Learning, 11(3&4), 22-24. Blackboard, http://www.blackboard.com/International/EMEA.aspx?lang=en-us Retrieved March 10, 2011.
  5. Bonham, S. W., Titus, A., Beichner, R. J., & Martin, J. (2000). Education research using web-based assessment systems. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(1),28-44.
  6. Bonham, S., Beicher, R., & Deardorff, D. (2001). Online homework: Does it make adifference?. Physics Teacher, 39(5), 293-296.
  7. Bonham, S. W., Deardorff, D. L., & Beichner, R. J. (2003). Comparison of studentperformance using web and paper-based homework in college level physics. Journalof Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 1050-1071.
  8. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırmadeseni, SPSS uygulamaları. Ankara:
  9. Pegem Yayıncılık. Campbell, D.T. & Stanley, J.C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs forresearch. Chicago: Rand McNally College Pub. Co. ClassNet, http://classnet.wcdsb.ca/Pages/about.aspx Retrieved March 10, 2011.
  10. Demirci, N. (2006). Developing web-printed homework system to access student'sintroductory physics course performance and compare to paper based homework.Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 7(3), 105-119.
  11. Demirci, N. (2007). University students' perceptions of web-based vs. paper-basedhomework in a general physics course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science& Technology Education, 3(1), 29-34.
  12. Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. London: D. C. Heath & Company. Heller, P. M., Keith, R., & Anderson, S. (1992). Teaching problem-solving throughcooperative grouping. Part 1: Group versus individual problem-solving. AmericanJournal of Physics, 60(7), 627-636.
  13. Heller, P., & Hollabaugh, M. (1992). Teaching problem solving through cooperativegrouping. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups. American Journalof Physics, 60(7), 637-644.
  14. Heller, K., & Heller,