Journals / Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi / 1966 / Cilt: 66 - Sayı: 66

Tectonic Units of Anatolia (Asia Minor)

ANADOLU'NUN TEKTONİK BİRLİKLERİ *

Pages
—
Publication Date
1966-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Arni, in his paper (4), divided Eastern Anatolian and Western Iranian ranges, from north to south, into following tectonic units : Northern Branch Pontids Southern Branch Anatolids Taurids Iranids (Zone of dislodged slices = Schuppenzone of Anatolia and Iran) Inner folds Border folds Outer folds Syrian - Arabian blocks

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The first subdivision of the Anatolian mountain ranges into tectonic units was made in 1896 by E.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Staub (1924, 1928), v.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Arni, in his paper (4), divided Eastern Anatolian and Western Iranian ranges, from north to south, into following tectonic units : Northern Branch Pontids Southern Branch Anatolids Taurids Iranids (Zone of dislodged slices = Schuppenzone of Anatolia and Iran) Inner folds Border folds Outer folds Syrian - Arabian blocks
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The first subdivision of the Anatolian mountain ranges into tectonic units was made in 1896 by E. Naumann, and his classification was later developed further by Alpine geologists such as E. Argand (1924), R. Staub (1924, 1928), v. W. Seidlitz (1931) and L. Kober (1931). In this first period the orogenetic belts of Anatolia were divided from north to south into three units, namely: Pontids, Intermediary massifs and Taurids, which were believed to be comparable to units in the Alps. The Pontids were connected to the Alpids by means of High Balkans and Carpathians; and in the same way the Taurus Mountains, by means of Hellenids, to Dinarids. In 1939, P. Arni divided the Anatolian mountain ranges into more units, based on his geological and paleontological researches in East and Southeast Anatolia, and comparing Eastern Anatolia with the mountain belts in Western Iran. He joined up the units which show similarities in tectonic development in both countries. P. Arni, in his paper (4), divided Eastern Anatolian and Western Iranian ranges, from north to south, into following tectonic units : Northern Branch Pontids Southern Branch Anatolids Taurids Iranids (Zone of dislodged slices = Schuppenzone of Anatolia and Iran) Inner folds Border folds Outer folds Syrian - Arabian blocks

Özet

Anadolu sıradağlarını tektonik ünitelere ayırma tecrübesi, bilindiği gibi, 1896 da E. Naumann ile başlamış, daha sonra E. Argand (1924), R. Staub (1924, 1928), v. W. Seidlitz (1931), L. Kober (1931, 1942) gibi alp jeologları tarafından geliştirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KETİN, İ. (1966). Tectonic Units of Anatolia (Asia Minor). Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, Cilt: 66 - Sayı: 66. https://ajindex.com/articles/54693

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. 1 — ABDALIAN, S. (1962): La Tectonique de l'lran. Publ. Inst. Géophysique Univ. de Tehran. 2 — ABDÜSSELAMOĞLU, Ş. (1959): Géologic de la région entre Almacık dağı et Mudurnu-Göynük. Fen Fak. Mon., no. 14, Istanbul (These). 3 — ARGAND, E. (1924): La Tectonique de 1'Asie. C. R. Congrés Géol Intern. XIII. sess. Belgique, 1922, fasc. I. 4 — ARNI, P. (1939): Tektonische Grundzuge Ostanatoliens und benachbarter Gebiete. M.T.A. Publ., série B, no. 4, Ankara. 5 — AYAN, M. (1963): Contribution a 1'étude petrographique et géologique de la région située, au Nord-Est de Kaman (Turquie). M.T.A. Publ., no. 115, Ankara. 6 — BAYKAL, F. (1943): La géologie de la region de Şile-Kocaeli (Bithynie) Anatolic. Monogr. Fac. Sc. Univ. d'İstanbul, no. 3, İstanbul. 7 — (1950): Aperçu geologique des environs des montagnes de Şerafettin et de Çotela etc. Rev. Fac. Sc. Univ. d'İstanbul, serie B, tome XV, fasc. 2. 8 — BLUMENTHAL, M. M. (1946): Die neue geologische Karte der Türkei und einige ihrer stratigraphisch-tektonischen Grundzüge. Eclogae Geol. Helv., vol. 39, no. 2. 9 — BÖCKH, LEES & RICHARDSON (1929): Contrubition to the stratigraphy and tectonic of the Iranian ranges. In the structure of Asia. Ed. by I. W. Gregory, Methuen & Co. Ltd., London. 10 — BORCHERT, H. (1958): Die Chrom- und Kupfererzlagerstaetten des initialen ophiolitischen Magmatismus in der Turkei. Veröff. des Inst. M.T.A., no. 102, Ankara. 11 — (1960): Chromitvorkommen in der Umgebung von Yeşilova-Burdur. M.T.A. Publ., no. 105, Ankara. 12 — BRUNN, J. H. (1960): Les zones Helléniques internes et leur extension. Réflexions sur 1'orogenese alpine. Bull. Soc. Géol. France, 7e série, t- II. 13 — (1961): Les sutures ophiolitiques. Contribution a 1'étude des relations entre phénoménes magmatiques et orogéniques. Rev. Géogr. et Géol. Dyn., vol. IV, fasc. 3, Paris. 14 — CHAPUT, E. (1931): Esquisse de 1'évolution tectonique de la Turquie. Fen Fak. Monogr. 6, Istanbul. 15— (1936): Voyages d'études géologiques et géomorphologiques en Turquie. Paris. 16 — DUBERTRET, L. (1955): Géologie des roches vertes du Nord-Ouest de la Syrie et du Hatay (Turquie). Notes et Mém. sur le Moy. Orient, tome VI, Paris. 17 — EGERAN, N. (1947): Tectonique de la Turquie et relations. etc. G. Thomas, Nancy. 18 — GABRIELYAN, A. H. (1964): The tectonic structure of Anticaucasus (the Minor Caucasus) and its position in the Mediterranean orogenic belt. Report of the 22. Int. Geol. Congr., New Delhi. 19 — GANSSER, A. (1956): New data