SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İnfeksiyon Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3

Bacteremia risk in children following primary tooth extraction

Süt dişi çekimi sonrası çocuklarda bakteriyemi riski

Özant ÖNÇAĞ
Şöhret AYDEMİR
Pages
309–319
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The percentage of positive prevalence of bacteremia caused by primary tooth extraction (73,76 %), was significantly higher (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of bacteremia after primary tooth extraction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Fifteen mentally handicapped patients and 4 young uncooperative children, totally 19 patients, with mean age of 8.57 ± 4.43, who underwent dental treatment with general anaesthesia were included in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The percentage of positive prevalence of bacteremia caused by primary tooth extraction (73,76 %), was significantly higher (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of bacteremia after primary tooth extraction. Fifteen mentally handicapped patients and 4 young uncooperative children, totally 19 patients, with mean age of 8.57 ± 4.43, who underwent dental treatment with general anaesthesia were included in this study. Three blood samples for cultures from each patient were obtained; baseline, and 30 seconds after both nasotracheal intubation and primary tooth extraction. BacT/Alert (bio Merieux) blood culture systems were used in the bacteriologic assesing of the blood samples. Blood samples were inoculated into each of aerobic and the anaerobic bottles. Following incubation, bacteria were identified using conventional and biochemical methods. Statistical significance was assessed by using SPSS 13.0 software program, with Me Nemar's test. The percentage of positive prevalence of bacteremia caused by primary tooth extraction (73,76 %), was significantly higher (p

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, süt dişi çekimi sonrasında bakteriyemi görülme sıklığının değerlendirmesidir. Çalışmada ortalama yaşları 8.57 ± 4.43 yıl olan, on beşi mental engelli ve dördü küçük yaşta uyumsuz çocuk olmak üzere toplam 19 hasta yer aldı. Her hastadan kültür için, biri başlangıçta diğeri nazotrakeal intübasyon ve süt dişi çekiminden 30 saniye sonra olmak üzere toplam üç tane kan örneği alındı. Kan örneklerinin bakteriyolojik değerlendirilmesinde BacT/ALERT (bio Merieux) kan kültür sistemi kullanıldı. Kan örnekleri, aerobik ve anaerobik şişelere inoküle edildiler. İnkübasyondan sonra bakteriler konvansiyonel ve biyokimyasal yöntemler kullanılarak idantifiye edildiler. İstatistiksel değerlendirmeler SPSS 13.0 paket programında, Mc Nemar testi ile yapıldı. Süt dişi çekimi sonrasında pozitif bakteriyemi prevalans yüzdesi (%73.76), başlangıç (%0) ve nazotrakeal intübasyon (%10.5) değerleri ile karşılaştırıldığında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede daha yüksekti (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖNÇAĞ, Ö., AYDEMİR, Ş. (2022). Bacteremia risk in children following primary tooth extraction. İnfeksiyon Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3, 309–319. https://ajindex.com/articles/546512

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Haffajee AD, Socransky SS. Microbiai etiological agents of destructive periodontal diseases. Periodontol 20001994; 5: 78-111
  2. Liljemark WK, Bloomquist CG. Normal microbial flora of the human body. In: Nisengard RJ, Newman MG, eds. Oral Microbiology and Immunology.2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders 1994: 120-28
  3. Carmona IT, Dios PD, Posse JL, Quintela AG, Vasquez CM, Iglesias AC. An update on infective endocarditis of dental origin. J Dent 2002; 30: 37-40
  4. Bhanji S, Williams B, Shelter B, Elwood T, Mancl L. Transient bacteremia induced by toothbrushing with a conventional toothbrush. Pediatr Dent2002; 24: 295-9
  5. Roberts GJ, Holzel HS, Sury MRJ, Simmons NA, Gardner P, Longhurst P. Dental bacteremia in children. Pediatr Cardiol 1997; 18: 24-7
  6. Debelian GJ, Olsen I, Transtad L. Bacteremia in conjunction with endodontic therapy. Endod Dent Traumatol 1995; 11: 142-9
  7. Erverdi N, Biren S, Kadir T, Acar A. Investigation of bacteremia following orthodontic debanding. Angle Orthod 2000; 70: 11-4
  8. Giglio JA, Rowland RW, Dalton HP, Laskin DM. Suture removal induced bacteremia: a possible endocarditis risk. J Am DentAssoc 1992; 123: 65-70
  9. Hall G, Heimdahl A, Nord CE. Bacteremia after oral surgery and antibiotic prophylaxis for endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis 1999; 29: 1-10
  10. Lucas V, Roberts GJ. Odontogenic bacteremia following tooth cleaning procedures in children. Pediatr Dent 2000; 22: 96-100
  11. Roberts GJ, Simmons NB, Longhurst P, Hewitt B. Bacteremia following local anaesthetic injections in children. BrDentJ 1998; 185: 295-8
  12. Messini M, Skourti I, Markopulos E, et al. Georgopoulos; Bacteremia after dental treatment in mentally handicapped people. J Clin Periodontol 1999; 26: 469-73
  13. Schlein RA, Kudlick M, Reindorf A, Gregory J, Royal GC. Toothbrushing and transient bacteremia in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991; 99:466-72
  14. Baltch AL, Buhac I, Agrawal A, O'Connor P, Bram M, Malatino E. Bacteremia after gastrointestinal endoscopy. Arch Intern Med 1977; 137: 594-7.;■.■ -.:-■.:■ 15. Burman SO. Bronchoscopy and bacteremia. J Thorac Cardivasc Surg 1960; 40: 435-9
  15. Dinner M, Tjeuw M, Joseph F, Artusio Jr. Bacteremia as a complication of nasotracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 1987; 66: 460-2
  16. Coulter WA, Coffey A, Saunders IDF, Erhmerson AM. Bacteraemia in children following dental extraction. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 1691 -5
  17. Kwon PH, Laskin DM. Clinician's manual of oral