SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2

An Example for The Effect of 5E Model on the Academic Achievement of Students: In The Unit of “Force and Motion”

An Example for The Effect of 5E Model on the Academic Achievement of Students: In The Unit of "Force and Motion"

Fatih GÜRBÜZ
Gökhan AKSOY
Pages
1–16
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As the result of the research revealed that experimental group in which students were thought by means of activities which were prepared according to the 5E model is more successful than control group in which students were thought by teaching in control group was carried out teaching method and models suggested by course books developed based on Science and Technology teaching program and approved by Ministry of Education in the unit “Force and Motion”

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of 5E model and teaching method and models suggested by course books developed based on Science and Technology teaching program and approved by Ministry of Education on seventh grade students’ academic achievements in the unit “Force and Motion”.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The subjects of the study were 57 seventh grade students at a primary school in Erzurum, who were in two different classes and taught by the same teacher at 2011-2012 education year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As the result of the research revealed that experimental group in which students were thought by means of activities which were prepared according to the 5E model is more successful than control group in which students were thought by teaching in control group was carried out teaching method and models suggested by course books developed based on Science and Technology teaching program and approved by Ministry of Education in the unit “Force and Motion”
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2011-2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of 5E model and teaching method and models suggested by course books developed based on Science and Technology teaching program and approved by Ministry of Education on seventh grade students’ academic achievements in the unit “Force and Motion”. The subjects of the study were 57 seventh grade students at a primary school in Erzurum, who were in two different classes and taught by the same teacher at 2011-2012 education year. One of the classes was randomly selected as experimental group (n=27) in which students were thought by means of activities which were prepared according to the 5E model, and the other was determined as the control group (n=30) in which students were thought by teaching method and models suggested by course books developed based on Science and Technology teaching program and approved by Ministry of Education. The main instruments for obtaining data were the Force and Motion Academic Achievement Test (FMAAT). The study results were analyzed by SPSS. The data obtained on instruments were evaluated by using descriptive statistic, independent samples t test, paired sample t test and effect sizes. As the result of the research revealed that experimental group in which students were thought by means of activities which were prepared according to the 5E model is more successful than control group in which students were thought by teaching in control group was carried out teaching method and models suggested by course books developed based on Science and Technology teaching program and approved by Ministry of Education in the unit “Force and Motion”

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜRBÜZ, F., AKSOY, G. (2022). An Example for The Effect of 5E Model on the Academic Achievement of Students: In The Unit of “Force and Motion”. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 1–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/545206

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Aksoy, G., ve Doymuş, K. (2011). Fen ve Teknoloji Dersinin Laboratuvar Öğretiminde İşbirlikli Öğrenmenin Etkisi. Erzincan Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi,I3(1), 1-16.
  2. Atasoy, Ş., ve Akdeniz, A.R., 2007. Newton’un Hareket Kanunları Konusunda Kavram Yanılgılarını Belirlemeye Yönelik Bir Testin Geliştirilmesi ve Uygulanması. Türk Fen EğitimiDergisi, 4(1), 45-49.
  3. Bozdoğan, A.E., ve Altunçekiç, A. (2007). Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının 5E Öğretim Modelinin Kullanılabilirliği Hakkındaki Görüşleri. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 15(2), 579-590.
  4. Bybee, R.W. (1997). Achieving Scientific Literacy.Portsmouth, N.H.: Heinemann. Bybee, R.W., Taylor, J.A., Gardner, A., Scotter, P.V., Powell, J.C., Westbrook, A., vd., (2006). The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins and effectiveness. Oflice ofScience Education National Institutes ofHealth, 1-80.
  5. Colorada Springs. Carin, A.A., ve Bass, J.E. (2001). Teaching Science as Inquiry. New Jersey, Prentice Hall. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2th ed.). 567 p, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrance Earlbaum Associates. Çalık, M. (2006). Biitiinlestirici öğrenme kuramına göre lise çözeltiler konusunda materyal geliştirilmesi ve uygulanması. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Çepni, S., Akdeniz, A.R., ve Keser, Ö.F. (2000). Fen bilimleri öğretiminde bütünleştirici öğrenme kuramına uygun örnek rehber materyallerin geliştirilmesi. 19. Fizik Kongresi, Fırat Üniversitesi,
  6. Elazığ. Çepni, S., ve Çil, E. (2009). Fen ve teknoloji programı (tanıma, planlama, uygulama ve SBS ’yle ilişkilendirme) İlköğretim ve 2. kademe Öğretmen el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları, 568 s. Doymus, K. (2008). Teaching chemical bonding through jigsaw cooperative learning. Research in Science ve Technological Education, 26(1), 47-57. Ergin, 1. (2009). 5e Modeli’nin Öğrencilerin Akademik Başarısına Ve Hatırlama Düzeyine Etkisi: “Eğik Atış Hareketi” Örneği. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(18), 11-26. Ergin, l., Ünsal, Y., ve Tan, M. (2006).5E Modelinin Öğrencilerin Akademik Başarısına ve Tutum Düzeylerine Etkisi:”Yatay Atış Hareketi” Örneği. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakiiltesi Dergisi, 7(2), 1-15.
  7. Glasersfeld, E.Von. (1995). Radical constructivism. way of knowing and learning. Routledge. Taylor and Francis Group. Keser, Ö.F (2003). Fizik eğitimine yönelik yapılandırmacı bir öğrenme ortamı tasarımı ve uygulaması. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Karadeniz Tekn