Journals / İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 23

Communication Ethics & Information: Global Citizens Thinking for Themselves

İletişim Etiği ve Enformasyon: Küresel Dünyanın Vatandaşları Kendileri İçin Düşünüyorlar

Pages
117–150
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Communication ethics thereby becomes 'a key discipline for individual and collective knowledge formation for an age of information.'

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Information-communication technology (ICT) is changing human behaviour and knowledgability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To successfully address a new knowledge paradigm, requires different capabilities, understanding and methods, equally for actors and audiences.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Communication ethics thereby becomes 'a key discipline for individual and collective knowledge formation for an age of information.'
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Information-communication technology (ICT) is changing human behaviour and knowledgability. To successfully address a new knowledge paradigm, requires different capabilities, understanding and methods, equally for actors and audiences. A new discipline of communication ethics offers a critical/creative moral compass for individual/collective decision-making, taking into account new dynamic conditions for shared/mediated reality. Using accepted knowledge creation/evaluation techniques, media and graphic techniques underpinned with principles of communication ethics, it is possible to promote morally founded human communication skills and their immediate convergence with technological systems. Communication ethics thereby becomes 'a key discipline for individual and collective knowledge formation for an age of information.'

Özet

Enformasyon teknolojisi, değişimi, insanlar tarafından daha önce hiç oluşturulmamış bir ölçekte küreselleştirmekte ve yerelleştirmektedir. Enformasyonun insanlar ve kurumlar üzerindeki etkisi, psikolojik ve sosyal istikrarın derin ve istikrarsız temel veçheleridir. Bu istikrarsızlıkla ilişkili olan ve sınırlı kaynakları ele geçirmek amacıyla hiç durmaksızın devam eden rekabet olgusu üzerine kurulu ekonomik sistemimiz ise, küresel sürdürülebilirlik endişelerinin gündeme getirdiği bir meydan okumayla karşı karşıya bulunmaktadır. Bu gelişmelere karşı verilmesi gereken cevap ise, hem ahlâki hem de enformasyonel gerçekliğin açık bir biçimde sergilenmesini sağlayan ve insanların, başlamış olan değişim sürecine katılmalarını mümkün kılan iletişim etiği disiplininin içinde yatmaktadır. İletişim Etiği Enstitüsü tarafından desteklenen ve türünün tek örneği niteliğini taşıyan bir enformasyonel sistem, enformasyon karmaşasını dile getirmek için elverişli bir araç sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BECKETT, R. (2022). Communication Ethics & Information: Global Citizens Thinking for Themselves. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 23, 117–150. https://ajindex.com/articles/545035

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Apel, Karl-Otto. (1972 [1980]) The a priori of the communication community and the foundation of ethics; The problem of a rational foundation of ethics in the scientific age. In Towards a Transformation of Philosophy (Trans., G. Adley & D. Frisby p.p. 225-300) [The International Library of Phenomenology and Moral Sciences]. London: Routeledge & Kegan Paul. Austin, J. L. (1962), How to do Things with Words. Oxford. Oxford University Press. Barnes, J. (1997) (edit) The Complete Works of Aristotle. Vol.1 and Vol 2. Boston. Princeton University Press. Barney, D. ( 2004) The Network Society. Cambridge. Polity. Bakhtin, M.M,1981. The Dialogic Imagination. Edit. Emerson, C. & Holquist,M. Austin,. University of Texas Press Benhabib, S. 1992. Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. New York. Routledge. Buber, M. 1973. Between Man And Man. Trans. Gregor Smith, R. London. Collins. Baudrillard, J. (1983b) In the Shadow of the Silent Majorities. Or the End of the Social. New York. Semiotexte. Baudrillard J. (1981) For A Critique Of The Political Economy Of The Sign. (Trans) With An Introduction by C. Levin. St. Louis, Mo. Telos Press. Bauman, Z. (1993) Postmodern Ethics. Oxford. Blackwell. Benhabib,S. (1992) Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. New York Routledge. Boisot M. (1995) Information Space: A Framework for Learning in Organizations, Institutions and Culture. London. Routledge. Bourdieu, Pierre (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. Buber, M. (1970) I and thou. Charles Scribner and Sons. New York. Buckminster-Fuller, R (1975) Synergetics: Explorations in the Geometry of Thinking. In Colaboration with E.J. Applewhite. Bynum T. W., Rogerson, S. (2004) Computer Ethics And Professional Responsibility. (eds.) Oxford. Blackwell Publishing. Bynum, T. W. Rogerson, S. (Eds) Global Information Ethics, special edition of Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol 2 No 2, 1996:135-162. Rogerson, S., Bynum, T.W., (1995) Cyberspace: The Ethical Frontier, The Times Higher Education Supplement, No 1179, 9 June, p iv. Castells, M. (1996) The Rise of the Network Society. Vol
  2. Oxford. Blackwell. Castells, M. (1997) The Power of Identity. Vol
  3. Oxford. Blackwell. Christians, C and Traber, M (1997). Communication Ethics and Universal Values. London. Sage Publications. Cooper, J, M. 1997. Plato Complete Works. Indianapolis, Indiana. Hackett Publishing Edgar, S.