Journals / İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 35

Looking at the Social Media Implementations of Metropolitan Municipality from Public Relations Models

Büyükşehir Belediyelerinin Sosyal Medya Uygulamalarına Halkla İlişkiler Modellerinden Bakmak

Pages
79–101
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, according to findings, it is seenthat messages in the official Twitter accounts of 9 metropolitan municipalities arenotices as part of public information model.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The developments in knowledge and information technologies startedto provide new opportunities for public relations implementations of publicinstitutions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, Twitter can assist citizens for contacting publicinstitutions and developing relations and this increases the applicability of two- way symmetrical model.9 Metropolitan municipalities which have Twitter account were includedin the survey. 3302 Twitter messages in the official accounts of these metropolitanmunicipalities were analyzed between the dates of 1 June - 31 August 2012 byusing content analysis method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, according to findings, it is seenthat messages in the official Twitter accounts of 9 metropolitan municipalities arenotices as part of public information model.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The developments in knowledge and information technologies startedto provide new opportunities for public relations implementations of publicinstitutions. Twitter one of the most popular social networking sites have thepossibility of informing citizens about actions and serves of metropolitanmunicipalities. Beside this, citizens have reached the possibility of sharingtheir expectations, demands, problems, suggestions with public institutions byusing Twitter. In this context, Twitter can assist citizens for contacting publicinstitutions and developing relations and this increases the applicability of two- way symmetrical model.9 Metropolitan municipalities which have Twitter account were includedin the survey. 3302 Twitter messages in the official accounts of these metropolitanmunicipalities were analyzed between the dates of 1 June - 31 August 2012 byusing content analysis method. According to results of the survey, messageswere generally sent and received in week days and out of working times. Thesemessages were generally about transportation, services, activities, basic facilitiesand social business of governing a city. Moreover, according to findings, it is seenthat messages in the official Twitter accounts of 9 metropolitan municipalities arenotices as part of public information model.

Özet

Bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerindeki gelişmeler kamu kuruluşlarının halklailişkiler uygulamaları için yeni fırsatlar sunmaya başlamıştır. Sosyal medyaaraçları içerisinde yer alan Twitter aracılığıyla belediyeler, faaliyetleri hakkındavatandaşlarını bilgilendirme olanağına sahip olmuştur. Ayrıca vatandaşlar, kurumagitmeksizin bir takım istek, beklenti, önerilerini iletilebilme sorularına belediyeyetkililerince yanıtlar bulma kolaylığına da kavuşmuşlardır. Bu yönüyle sosyalmedya uygulamalarından Twitter, taraflar arası diyalog kurma ve geliştirmeyeyardımcı olduğu gibi iki yönlü simetrik modelin uygulanabilirliğini dearttırmaktadır.Araştırmaya kurumsal Twitter hesabı bulunan 9 büyükşehir belediyesi dahiledilmiş; ilgili belediyelerin 1 Haziran 2012 - 31 Ağustos 2012 tarihleri arasındaresmi hesaplarındaki 3302 mesaj, içerik çözümlemesi yöntemiyle incelenmiştir.Araştırma sonucunda, büyükşehir belediyelerinin hesaplarındaki mesajların dahaçok hafta içi günlerde ve mesai saati dışında alınıp gönderildiği, hesaplardakimesajların daha çok ulaşım, hizmet, altyapı, etkinlik ve sosyal belediyecilik ile ilgiliolduğu belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca araştırma bulgularında, büyükşehir belediyelerininkurumsal hesaplarındaki mesajların büyük bir bölümünün kamuyu bilgilendirmemodeli çerçevesindeki duyurular olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TARHAN, A. (2022). Looking at the Social Media Implementations of Metropolitan Municipality from Public Relations Models. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 35, 79–101. https://ajindex.com/articles/544938

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Bonsón, E., Torres, L., Royo, S. ve Flores, F., (2012). “Local e-Government 2.0: Social Media and Corporate Transparency in Municipalities”, Government Information Quarterly, 29, 123-132.
  2. Boyd, D., Golder, S. ve Lotan, G., (2010). “Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter”, Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii Interanational Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society, 1-10.
  3. Case, C. J. ve King, D. L., (2011). “Twitter Usage in the Fortune 50: A Marketing Opporutinity?”, Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness, 5 (3), 94-103.
  4. Cho, S. E. ve Park, H. W., (2012). “Government Organizations’ Innoveative Use of the Internet: The Case of the Twitter Activity of South Korea’s Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries”, Scientometrics, 90, 9-23.
  5. Chun, S. A., Shulman, S., Sandoval, R. ve Hovy, E., (2010). “Government 2.0: Making Connections Between Citizens, Data and Government”, Information Polity, 15, 1-9.
  6. Dadashzadeh, Mohammad, (2010). “Social Media in Government: From eGovemment to eGovemance”, Journal of Business & Economics Research, 8 (11), 81- 86. Davis, Anthony, (2006). Halkla İlişkilerin ABC’si, İstanbul:
  7. Kapital Medya Hizmetleri A.Ş. Eyrich, N., Padman, M. L. ve Sweetser, K. D., (2008). “PR Practitioners’ Use of Social Media Tools and Communication Technology”, Public Relations Review, 34, 412- 414. Fawkes, Johanna, (2001). “What is Public Relations?”, Alison Theaker (ed), The Public Relations Handbook, London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 3-12.
  8. Grunig, James E., (1990). “Theory and Practice of Interactive Media Relations”, Public Relations Quarterly, 35 (3), 18-23.
  9. Grunig, J. E. ve Grunig, L. A., (2005). “Halkla İlişkiler ve İletişim Modelleri”, James E. Grunig (ed), Halkla İlişkiler ve İletişim Yönetiminde Mükemmellik, E. Özsayar (çev.), İstanbul: Rota Yayınları, 307-348.
  10. Grunig, J. E. ve Grunig, L. S., (1989). “Toward a Theory of the Public Relations Behavior of Organizations: Review of a Program of Research”, James E Grunig ve Larissa Schneider Grunig (eds), Public Relations Research Annual, Vol I, New Jersey: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, 27-63.
  11. Grunig, J. E. ve Hunt, T., (1984).
  12. Managing Public Relations, Belmont:Wadswort/ Thomson Learning. Grunig, L. A., Grunig, J. E. ve Dozier, D. M., (2002). Excellent Public Relations and Effective Organizations - A Study of Communication Management in Three Countries, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Harrison, Shirley, (2004).