Journals / İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 40

Örgütsel Bağlılık ve Örgütsel Sinizim İlişkisi Üzerine Bir Araştırma

A Research on the Relationship Between Organizational Commitment and Organizational Cynicism

Pages
77–97
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the studyresult, it is realized that cynicism levels of workers affected by commitment levels for theirorganization.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Organizational commitment concept has been one of the most important subjectsrecently as transforming from industrial society to information and consumption society.Organizational commitment is a psychological situation that shapes the relation ofmanagement with worker and provides the decision to continue to work in management.Organizational cynicism as a different dimension of the study appears as a negativebehavior towards the organization in which one works.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This paper is written in order to take a step in meeting the needs.So as to contribute to the discussion process for this subject, organizational commitmentand organizational cynicism scale are applied to 412 workers, from the hotels in Kayseriand 6 of them are 3-stared and 4 of them are 4-stared.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the studyresult, it is realized that cynicism levels of workers affected by commitment levels for theirorganization.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Organizational commitment concept has been one of the most important subjectsrecently as transforming from industrial society to information and consumption society.Organizational commitment is a psychological situation that shapes the relation ofmanagement with worker and provides the decision to continue to work in management.Organizational cynicism as a different dimension of the study appears as a negativebehavior towards the organization in which one works. Personnel, psychological breachof contract, lacks in management behaviors etc are among the reasons of organizationalcynicism. Both of two concepts are dealt with relating different organizational outputsin literature but especially in Turkish, studies dealing with the possible relation of twoconcepts are really limited. This paper is written in order to take a step in meeting the needs.So as to contribute to the discussion process for this subject, organizational commitmentand organizational cynicism scale are applied to 412 workers, from the hotels in Kayseriand 6 of them are 3-stared and 4 of them are 4-stared. So, results are tried to be argued interms of organizational dynamics. Questionnaire study is preferred as a research technique.Organizational commitment is tried to be evaluated through organizational commitmentscale, developed by Allen and Meyer (1990) and organizational cynicism is tried to beevaluated through organizational cynicism scale, developed by Dean (1998). In the studyresult, it is realized that cynicism levels of workers affected by commitment levels for theirorganization.

Özet

Endüstriyel üretim toplumundan bilgi ve tüketim toplumuna geçerken, örgütselbağlılık son yıllarda üzerinde en çok durulan kavramlar arasındadır. Örgütsel bağlılık,çalışanın işletmeyle olan ilişkisini şekillendiren, işletmede çalışmaya devam etme kararınınalınmasını sağlayan psikolojik bir durumdur. Çalışmanın bir diğer boyutu olan örgütselsinizm ise, kişinin çalıştığı örgüte yönelik olumsuz tutumu olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır.Örgütsel sinizmin nedenleri arasında kişilik, psikolojik sözleşme ihlali, liderlikdavranışındaki eksiklikler vb. sayılmaktadır. Literatürde her iki kavram farklı örgütselçıktılarla ilişkilendirilerek ele alınmış ancak özellikle Türkçe literatürde her iki kavramınmuhtemel ilişkisine değinen çalışma sayısı sınırlı kalmıştır. Bu çalışma, iletişim alanındakibu açığı kapatma noktasında bir adım atmak amacıyla kaleme alınmış; konuya yöneliktartışma sürecine katkı sağlamak amacıyla Kayseride faaliyet gösteren 6sı 3 yıldızlı,4ü 4 yıldızlı olmak üzere konaklama işletmelerinin 412 çalışanına örgütsel bağlılık veörgütsel sinizm ölçeği uygulanarak, sonuçlar örgütsel dinamikler bağlamında tartışılmayaçalışılmıştır. Araştırma yöntemi olarak anket çalışması tercih edilmiş; örgütsel bağlılıkAllen ve Meyer (1990) tarafından geliştirilen örgütsel bağlılık ölçeği ile, örgütsel sinizm iseDean vd. (1998) tarafından geliştirilen örgütsel sinizm ölçeği kapsamında ölçümlenmeyeçalışılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda çalışanların örgütsel sinizm düzeylerinin, onlarınörgütlerine olan bağlılık düzeylerini etkilediği sonucuna varılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLLÜPĞLU, Ö. I. (2022). Örgütsel Bağlılık ve Örgütsel Sinizim İlişkisi Üzerine Bir Araştırma. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 40, 77–97. https://ajindex.com/articles/544869

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1977). “Attitude-Behavior Relations: A Theoretical Analysis and Review of Empirical Research”, Psychological Bulletin, 84:888-918.
  2. Allen, N.J. and Meyer, J.P (1990), “The Measurement and Antecedents of Affective, Continuance and Normative Commitment to the Organization”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63:1-18.
  3. Allen, N.J. and Meyer, J.P. (1996). “Affective, Continuance, And Normative Commitment: An Examination of Construct Validity”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49: 252-276.
  4. Andersson, Lynee M. (1996). “Employee Cynicism: An Examination Using A Contract Violation Framework”, Human Relations, 49(11). Andersson, L.M., and Bateman, T.S. (1997). “Cynicism In The Workplace: Some Causes And Effects” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18: 449-469.
  5. Angle, H. L., and Perry, J. L. (1981). “An Empirical Assessment of Organization Commitment And Organizational Effectiveness”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 1-13.
  6. Balfour, D.L., and Wechsler, B. (1996). “Organizational commitment: Antecedents and Outcomes in Public Organizations”, Public Productivity and Management Review, 29, 256–277.
  7. Balmforth, K. and Gardner, D. (2006). “Conflict And Facilitation Between Work And Family: Realizing The Outcomes For Organizations”, New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 35: 69-76.
  8. Barnes, Lenora Lacy, “The Effects of Organizational Cynicism on Community Colleges: Exploring Concepts from Positive Psycholog”y, internet adresi:http://udini.proquest.com/view/the-effects-of-organizational-goid:305190503/ erişim Tarihi: 12 şubat 2014
  9. Bateman, Thomas S. et al., (1992). “Roger, Me, and my Attitude: Film Propaganda and Cynicism toward Corporate Leadership”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 77:786-771.
  10. Bateman, T. and Strasser, S. (1984). “A Longitudinal Analysis of the Antecedents of Organizational Commitment”. Academy of Management Journal, 21: 95-112.
  11. Becker, Thomas et al., (1996). “Foci and Bases of Employee Commitment: Implications for Job Performance”, Academy of Management Journal, 39: 464-82.
  12. Brown, M. and Cregan, C. (2008). Organizational Change Cynicism: The Role of Employee Involvement. Human Resource Management, 47(4): 667–686.
  13. Cartwright, S. and Holmes, N. (2006). “The Meaning Of Work: The Challenge Of Regaining Employee Engagement And Reducing Cynicism”, Human Resource Management Review, 16: 199-208.
  14. Chughtai, A.A and Zafar, S. (2006), “Antecedents and Consequences of Organizational Commitment Among Pakistani University Teachers”, Applied H. R.