Journals / İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 42

New Clerical Class in the Politics: Political Professionals as Experts of Policy and Persuasion

Politikada Yeni Ruhban Sınıfı: Siyasa ve İkna Uzmanları Olarak Politik Profesyoneller

Pages
173–190
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Even if the Pluralism remains the dominant approach, critical theory offers a more accurate analysis framework in the study of political professionals

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Professionalism and professionals attracted the attention of various disciplines for a long time.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Since the second half of the 20th century, this first period notion of professionals embraced a new type of professionals who had adapted their experiences which gained in the economic field to the politics and had spreaded a new understanding of politics which is equivalent to marketing strategy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Even if the Pluralism remains the dominant approach, critical theory offers a more accurate analysis framework in the study of political professionals
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Professionalism and professionals attracted the attention of various disciplines for a long time. They are also one of the most important ethos of modern democracies and political science. In the political field, the term of professionals was first used by Max Weber to define the type of politician by profession. Since the second half of the 20th century, this first period notion of professionals embraced a new type of professionals who had adapted their experiences which gained in the economic field to the politics and had spreaded a new understanding of politics which is equivalent to marketing strategy. In general, political science considered the professionals as the second source of political decisions and practices following the elections. Moreover, political science discussed this issue around two main paradigms. Even if the Pluralism remains the dominant approach, critical theory offers a more accurate analysis framework in the study of political professionals

Özet

Profesyonellik ve profesyoneller uzun zamandır farklı disiplinlerin ilgisini çekmiştir. Günümüzde de modern demokrasilerin ve politika biliminin en önemli etoslarından biridir. Politik alanda ilk kez Max Weber tarafından meslekten politikacı tipini tanımlamak üzere kullanılmıştır. Bu ilk dönem profesyonellere, 20. yüzyılın ikinci yarısından itibaren ekonomik alanda edindikleri deneyimleri politikaya uyarlayan, pazarlama stratejisine denk düşen bir politika kavrayışını yaygınlaştıran yeni türden profesyoneller eklenmiştir. Genel olarak politika bilimi profesyonelleri, politik kararların ve uygulamaların meşruluğunun seçimler dışındaki ikinci kaynağı saymış, iki ana paradigma etrafında tartışmıştır. Çoğulculuk egemen yaklaşım olma özelliğini sürdürse de, politik profesyonellerin incelenmesi konusunda eleştirel kuram daha doğru bir çözümleme çerçevesi sunmaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

KESKİN, F. (2022). New Clerical Class in the Politics: Political Professionals as Experts of Policy and Persuasion. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 42, 173–190. https://ajindex.com/articles/544854

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abbott, A. (1988), The System of Professions. An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor, University of Chicago Press.
  2. Alisch, L. Michael, Baumert, J. ve Beck, K. (Hg.) (1990), Professionswissen und Professionalisierung, Technische Universität, Braunschweig. Altheide, D. L.- Snow, R.P. (1988), "Toward a theory of mediation", A. Anderson, James (Ed.), Communication Yearbook, 11, CA, Newbury Park, s. 194-223.
  3. Beyme, K. von (1992), "Der Begriff der politischen Klasse-Eine neue Dimension der Elitenforschung?", Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Vol 33, s. 4-32.
  4. Bourdieu, P. (2001), Das politische Feld. Zur Kritik der politischen Vernunft, UVK, Konstanz. Bourdieu, P. ve Wacquant, L. (2006),
  5. Reflexive Anthropologie, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. Burke, E. (1967), Betrachtungen über die französische Revolution, Übers. v. Friedrich Gentz [1790], Frankfurt a. M. Borchert, J. (2003),
  6. Die Professionalisierung der Politik, Campus Verlag, Frankfurt/ Main. Brown, M.B.- Lentsch, J. ve Weingart, P. (2006),
  7. Politikberatung und Parlament, Verlag Barbara Budrich, Opladen. Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R. ve Farr, M. J. (Ed.) (1988),
  8. The Nature of Expertise, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. Chomsky, N. (1971),
  9. American Power and the New Mandarins, Vintage, New York. Dalton, R. J. (1996), Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies, Chatham, NJ: Chatham House. Dingwall, P. ve Lewis, P. (Ed.) (1983),
  10. The Sociology of Professions, Basingstoke/ London. Domhoff, W. G. (1987), "Where Do Government Experts Come From?", Domhoff, William- Dye, Thomas (Ed.), Power Elites and Organizations, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, s. 189-200.
  11. Dye, T. (1987), "Organizing for Policy Planning: The View from the Brookings Institution", Domhoff, William- Dye, Thomas (Ed.), Power Elites and Organizations, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, s. 169-188.
  12. Ericsson, K. A. ve Smith, J. (Ed.) (1991), Toward a General Theory of Expertise: Prospects and Limits, Cambridge University Press,
  13. Cambridge, England. Field, G. L. ve Higley, J. (1973), Elites and Non-Elites: The possibilities and their Side Effects, MA: Warner Modular Publications, Andover. Fischer, F. (1996), Technocracy and Politics of Expertise, Sage Publications, London. Freidson, E. (1986), Professional Powers. A Study of the Instirutionalization of Formal Knowledge, Chicago/London. Gehne, D. H. ve Spier, T. (2010), Krise oder Wandel der Parteiendemokratie, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. Go