SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 47

Method and Theory in Intermedia Agenda Setting Studies

Medyalar Arası Gündem Belirleme Araştırmalarında Yöntem ve Kuram

Sevgi Can YAĞCI AKSEL
Cem YAŞIN
Can CENGİZ
Pages
20–42
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It has been concluded that the transition between levels is an evolutionary process that takes place over time, rather than a paradigm break.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article aims to analyze the method of intermedia agenda setting studies and the academic knowledge, based on this method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this respect, method sections of 24 articles selected using the ‘web of Science ‘ search engine were tabulated and analyzed with a qualitative evaluation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It has been concluded that the transition between levels is an evolutionary process that takes place over time, rather than a paradigm break.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the method of intermedia agenda setting studies and the academic knowledge, based on this method. In this respect, method sections of 24 articles selected using the ‘web of Science ‘ search engine were tabulated and analyzed with a qualitative evaluation. In this table, it was observed that the basic assumptions of the first level, second level qualitative agenda setting studies and the third level overlap, and although there are new techniques added to the method, the research is designed with a similar approach. It has been concluded that the transition between levels is an evolutionary process that takes place over time, rather than a paradigm break. İt is understood that the theoretical discussions that are based on the studies refer to the basic texts, that they refer to the founding theorists such as McCombs and that the theoretical roofs are built on this basis.

Özet

Bu makale medyalar arası gündem belirleme (intermedia agenda setting)çalışmalarına ilişkin yöntemi ve bu yöntemi temellendiren bilimsel bilgi birikiminiçözümlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu doğrultuda, ‘Web of Science arama motoru kullanılarakseçilmiş olan 24 makalenin yöntem bölümleri, nitel bir değerlendirme ile tablolaştırılarakçözümlenmiştir. Söz konusu tabloda, birinci düzey, ikinci düzey niteliksel gündem belirlemeçalışmaları ile üçüncü düzey gündem belirleme çalışmalarının temel varsayımlarınınörtüştüğü, hatta yönteme eklenmiş yeni teknikler olmasına rağmen araştırmaların birbirinebenzer bir yaklaşımla tasarlandığı görülmüştür. Düzeyler arasında geçişin bir paradigmakırılmasından çok, zaman içinde kurama ve yönteme eklenmeler ile gerçekleşen evrimselbir süreç olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. Çalışmaları temellendiren kuramsal tartışmalarınise temel metinlere gönderme yaptığı, McCombs gibi kurucu kuramcılara referans vererektartışıldığı ve kuramsal çatıların bu temel üzerine inşa edildiği anlaşılmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

AKSEL, S. C. Y., YAŞIN, C., CENGİZ, C. (2022). Method and Theory in Intermedia Agenda Setting Studies. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 47, 20–42. https://ajindex.com/articles/544771

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Andrew, R., & Sharon, M. (2016). Rumors and factitious informational blends: The role of the web in speculative politics. New Media & Society, 18, 1, 25-43.
  2. Boyle, T. (2001). Intermedia Agenda Setting in the 1996
  3. Presidential Election, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, vol. 78, 1: pp. 26-44.
  4. GR, Boynton., & Glenn, W. R. (2016). Agenda setting in the twenty-first century. New Media & Society, 18, 9, 1916-1934.
  5. Cheng, Z. Guy, J. Golan, Kiousis, S. (2016) “The Second-Level Agenda-Building Function of the Xinhua News Agency”, Journalism Practice, 10:6, 744-762
  6. Cohen, B.C. (1963).
  7. The Press and Foreign Policy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Pres. Cohen, J.E. (1995). “Presidential Rhetoric and the Public Agenda”, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 39, No. 1. (Feb.,), pp. 87-107.
  8. Conway, B. A., Kenski, K., & Wang, D. (2016). The Rise of Twitter in the Political Campaign: Searching for Intermedia Agenda-Setting Effects in the Presidential Primary. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. Denham, Bryan E. (2014). “Intermedia Attribute Agenda Setting in the New York Times: The Case of Animal Abuse in U.S. Horse Racing, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 2014, Vol. 91(1) 17-37
  9. DiStaso, Marcia W. (2012). “The Annual Earnings Press Release’s Dual Role: An Examination of Relationships with Local and National Media Coverage and Reputation”, Journal of Public Relations Research, 24:2, 123-143
  10. Dunn, S. W. (2009), “Candidate and Media Agenda Setting in the 2005 Virginia Gubernatorial Election”, Journal of Communication, 59, 635-652.
  11. Entman, R. (1993). Framing Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.
  12. Harder, R. A., Sevenans, J., Van Aelst, P. (2017). “Intermedia Agenda Setting in the Social Media Age: How Traditional Players Dominate the News Agenda in Election Times”, The International Journal of Press/Politics, Vol. 22(3) 275-293.
  13. Heim, K., (2013). “Framing the 2008 Iowa Democratic Caucuses: Political Blogs and Second- Level Intermedia Agenda Setting”, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 90(3) 500-519.
  14. Kaye D. Sweetser, Guy J. Golan, Wayne W., (2008). “Intermedia Agenda Setting in Television, Advertising, and Blogs During the 2004 Election”, Mass Communication and Society, 11:2, 197-216.
  15. Kim, J., Gonzenbach, W. J., Vargo, C. J., Kım, Y., (2016). “First and Second Levels of Intermedia Agenda Setting: Political Advertising, Newspapers, and Twitter During the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election”,