Journals / IUFS Journal of Biology / 2013 / Cilt: 72 - Sayı: 1

Induced systemic resistance: an innovative control method to manage branched broomrape (Orobanche ramosa L.) in tomato

Pages
9–21
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The present results indicate the effectiveness of SA and IAAin enhancing resistance of tomato to retard the incidence of infestation by Orobanche.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The biochemical responses of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) roots to different concentrationsof the hormonal elicitors, salicylic acid (SA) and indole acetic acid (IAA), as presoaking treatments,on the healthy and Orobanche ramosa-infected plants were studied in pot experiment under controlconditions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Moreover, bothelicitors increased the levels of phenolics and favonoids accompanied by stimulations in the activities ofphenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL), peroxidase (POX) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) in tomato roots,where the magnitude of induction were more obvious in infected plants than healthy one.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The present results indicate the effectiveness of SA and IAAin enhancing resistance of tomato to retard the incidence of infestation by Orobanche.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The biochemical responses of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) roots to different concentrationsof the hormonal elicitors, salicylic acid (SA) and indole acetic acid (IAA), as presoaking treatments,on the healthy and Orobanche ramosa-infected plants were studied in pot experiment under controlconditions. Application of SA and IAA activate the production of proline and soluble proteins in tomatoroots, where their levels were more pronounced in the infected than the healthy plants. Moreover, bothelicitors increased the levels of phenolics and favonoids accompanied by stimulations in the activities ofphenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL), peroxidase (POX) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) in tomato roots,where the magnitude of induction were more obvious in infected plants than healthy one. Also, microscopicexamination revealed the anatomical differences observed in both untreated healthy and infected plants aswell as in plants treated with SA and IAA. The present results indicate the effectiveness of SA and IAAin enhancing resistance of tomato to retard the incidence of infestation by Orobanche. These biochemicaland histological changes involved in plant defense mechanisms may be one of the basic ways participatein the action of SA and IAA for increasing resistance in tomato against Orobanche ramosa.

🔖

Cite This Article

MADANY, M. M. Y., WAKEEL, S. A. M. A., MOUBASHER, H., GABR, M. M. (2022). Induced systemic resistance: an innovative control method to manage branched broomrape (Orobanche ramosa L.) in tomato. IUFS Journal of Biology, Cilt: 72 - Sayı: 1, 9–21. https://ajindex.com/articles/544011

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Agrawal G.K., Rakwal R., Tamogami S., Yonekura M., Kubo A. and Saji H. (2002) Chitosan activates defense/stress response(s) in the leaves of Oryza sativa seedlings. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 40:1061–1069. Al-Wakeel S., Moubasher H., Gabr M. and Madany, M.M.Y. (2012) Induction of systemic resistance in tomato plants against Orobanche ramosa L. using hormonal inducers. Egyptian Journal of Botany (In press). Amin A. A., Rashad E.M. and El-Abagy H.M.H. (2007) Physiological effect of indole-3-butyric acid and salicylic acid on growth, yield and chemical constituents of onion plants. Journal of Applied Science Research, 3: 1554-1563.
  2. Bates L.S., Waldern R.P. and Teare I.D. (1973) Rapid determination of free proline for water- stress studies. Plant and Soil, 39: 205-207.
  3. Beckman C. (2000) Phenolic-storing cells: keys to programmed cell death and periderm formation in wilt disease resistance and in general defence responses in plants. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 57:101-110
  4. Bolwell G. P., Butt V., Davies D. and Zimmerlin, A. (1995) The origin of the oxidative burst in plants. Free Radical Research, 23: 517–532. Bowels D.J. (1990) Defense-related proteins in higher plants. Annual Review of Biochemistry, 59: 873-907.
  5. Cagan L. and Toth P. (2003) A decrease in tomato yield caused by branched broomrape parasitization. Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica, 6:65–68. Castillejo A.M., Amiour N., Dumas-Gaudot E., Rubiales D. and Jorrin J.V. (2004) A proteomic approach to studying plant response to crenate broomrape ( Orobanche crenata) in pea ( Pisum sativum). Phytochemistry, 65: 1817–1828. Chranowski G., Ciepiela A.P., Sprawka I., Sempruch C., Sytkiewicz H. and Czerniewicz P. (2003) Activity of polyphenol oxidase in the ears of spring wheat and triticale infested by grain aphid ( Sitobion avenae ). Electronic Journal of Polish and Agriculture Universities, 6: 132-139.
  6. De-Zelicourt A., Letousey P., Thoiron S., Campion C., Simoneau P., Elmorjani K., Marion D., Simier P. and Delavault P. (2007) Ha-DEF1, a sunfower defensin, induces cell death in Orobanche parasitic plants. Planta, 226:591– 600. Durrant W.E. and Dong X. (2004) Systemic acquired resistance. Annual Review of Phytopthology, 42: 185-209.
  7. El-Tayeb M.A., El-Enany A.E. and Ahmed N.L. (2006) Salicylic acid-induced adaptive response to copper stress in sunfower ( Helianthus annuus L.). Plant Growth Regulators, 50: 191–199. Goldwasser Y., Hershenhorn J., Plakhine D., Kleifeld Y. and Rubin B. (1999) B