Journals / IUFS Journal of Biology / 2014 / Cilt: 73 - Sayı: 2

İki Arpa Varyetesinde Tuzluluğun Etkisiyle Oluşan Değişimlerin Karşılaştırılması

Comparison of Salinity-Induced Changes in Two Cultivars of Barley

Pages
9–16
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Bornova-92 and Hilal may be regarded as salt-tolerant and salt-susceptible, respectively and the relative salt-tolerance of Bornova-92 may be due to cytosine methylation patterns and/or regulation of protein synthesis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In vitro effects of salinity were compared in two cultivars of barley (Hordeum vulgare cv.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Bornova-92 and Hilal).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Bornova-92 and Hilal may be regarded as salt-tolerant and salt-susceptible, respectively and the relative salt-tolerance of Bornova-92 may be due to cytosine methylation patterns and/or regulation of protein synthesis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In vitro effects of salinity were compared in two cultivars of barley (Hordeum vulgare cv. Bornova-92 and Hilal). Mature embryos were cultured on Murashige and Skoog media supplemented with 0, 50 and 100 mM NaCl for 20 days. NaCl-treatment decreased maximum shoot length, total soluble protein and DNA contents in both cultivars but decreased maximum root length in Hilal. Changes in fresh and dry weight and water content were not statistically-significant. Inhibitory effects were more dramatic in Hilal. Salinity did not cause genotoxic effects in both cultivars yet slightly affected protein patterns in Bornova-92. However, salinity altered cytosine methylation patterns from CCG to CG in Bornova-92, from CG to CCG in Hilal. Bornova-92 and Hilal may be regarded as salt-tolerant and salt-susceptible, respectively and the relative salt-tolerance of Bornova-92 may be due to cytosine methylation patterns and/or regulation of protein synthesis.

Özet

Tuzluluğun in vitro ortamdaki etkileri 2 arpa varyetesinde (Hordeum vulgare cv. Bornova-92 and Hilal) karşılaştırıldı. Olgun embriyolar 0, 50 ve 100 mM NaCl içeren Murashige ve Skoog besiortamında 20 gün boyunca kültüre alındı. NaCl uygulaması maksimum sürgün boyunu, total çözünebilir protein ve DNA içeriğini her 2 varyetede de azaltırken; maksimum kök uzunluğunu Hilal varyetesinde azalttı. Taze ve kuru ağırlıktaki ve su içeriğindeki değişimler istatistik olarak anlamlı bulunmadı. İnhibe edici etkiler Hilal varyetesinde daha belirgindi. Tuzluluk her 2 varyetede de genotoksik etki oluşturmamasına karşın Bornova-92 varyetesinde protein profilini biraz etkiledi. Tuzluluk, Bornova-92 varyetesinde sitozin metilasyonunu CCGden CG olacak şekilde etkilerken; Hilal varyetesinde CGden CCG olacak şekilde etkiledi. Bornova-92 ve Hilal, sırayla tuza dayanıklı ve duyarlı olarak tanımlanabilir ve Bornova-92nin görece tuzluluk dayanıklılığı sitozin metilasyon profilinden ve/veya protein sentezinin düzenlenmesinden kaynaklı olabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TEMEL, A. (2022). İki Arpa Varyetesinde Tuzluluğun Etkisiyle Oluşan Değişimlerin Karşılaştırılması. IUFS Journal of Biology, Cilt: 73 - Sayı: 2, 9–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/544004

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Atienzar F., Evenden A., Jha A., Savva D. and Depledge M. (2000) Optimized RAPD analysis generates high-quality genomic DNA profiles at high annealing temperature. Biotechniques, 28: 52-54.
  2. Aydin S. S., Gokce E., Buyuk I. and Aras S. (2012) Characterization of stress induced by copper and zinc on cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) seedlings by means of molecular and population parameters. Mutation Research, 746: 49-55.
  3. Ben-Hattar J., Beard P. and Jiricny J. (1989) Cytosine methylation in CTF and Sp1 recognition sites of an HSV tk promoter: effects on transcription in vivo and on factor binding in vitro. Nucleic Acids Research, 17: 10179-10190.
  4. Cai Q., Guy C. L. and Moore G. A. (1996) Detection of cytosine methylation and mapping of a gene influencing cytosine methylation in the genome of Citrus. Genome 39: 235-242.
  5. Clark S. J., Harrison J. and Molloy P. L. (1997) Sp1 binding is inhibited by mCpmCpG methylation. Gene, 195: 67-71.
  6. Demirkiran A., Marakli S., Temel A. and Gozukirmizi N. (2013) Genetic and epigenetic effects of salinity on in vitro growth of barley. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 36: 566-570.
  7. Fatehi F., Hosseinzadeh A., Alizadeh H., Brimavandi T. and Struik P.C. (2012) The proteome response of salt-resistant and salt-sensitive barley genotypes to longterm salinity stress. Molecular Biology Reports 39: 6387-6397.
  8. Fernandez E., Figueiras M. and Benito C. (2002) The use of ISSR and RAPD markers for detecting DNA polymorphism, genotype identification and genetic diversity among barley cultivars with known origin. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 104: 845-851.
  9. Hernandez J. A., Corpas F. J., Gomez M., del Rio L. A. and Sevilla F. (1993) Salt induced oxidative stress mediated by activated oxygen species in pea leaf mitochondria. Physiologia Plantarum, 89: 103-110.
  10. Hu Y. and Schmidhalter U. (2005) Drought and salinity: A comparison of their effects on mineral nutrition of plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 168: 541- 549. Imlay J. A. (2003) Pathways of oxidative damage. Annual Reviews of Microbiology, 57: 395-418.
  11. Laemmli U. K. (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature, 227: 680-685.
  12. Liu T., Van Staden J. and Cress W. A. (2000) Salinity induced nuclear and DNA degradation in meristematic cells of soybean (Glycine max (L.)) roots. Plant Growth Regulation, 30: 49-54.
  13. Liu W., Li P. J., Qi X. M., Zhou Q. X., Zheng L., Sun T. H. and Yang Y. S. (2005) DNA changes in barley (Hordeum vulgare