Journals / Istanbul University Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering / 2009 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Comparative study of a priori signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) estimation approaches for speech enhancement

Pages
807–817
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This paper presents a comparative study of different a priori SNR estimation methods and a performance evaluation of a Wiener denoising technique using those methods by the extensive objective quality measures under various noisy environments.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The problem of noise reduction has attracted a considerable amount of research attention over the past several decades.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Among the numerous techniques that were developed, the Wiener filter can be considered as one of the most fundamental noise reduction approaches, which has been delineated in different forms and adopted in various applications.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This paper presents a comparative study of different a priori SNR estimation methods and a performance evaluation of a Wiener denoising technique using those methods by the extensive objective quality measures under various noisy environments.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The problem of noise reduction has attracted a considerable amount of research attention over the past several decades. Among the numerous techniques that were developed, the Wiener filter can be considered as one of the most fundamental noise reduction approaches, which has been delineated in different forms and adopted in various applications. An important parameter of numerous speech enhancement algorithms is the a priori signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The Wiener filter emphasizes portions of the noisy signal spectrum where SNR is high and attenuates portions of the spectrum where the SNR is low. So an a priori SNR estimator is a very important component of the Speech enhancement algorithm, especially if the algorithm should be capable of handling non-stationary noise. This paper presents a comparative study of different a priori SNR estimation methods and a performance evaluation of a Wiener denoising technique using those methods by the extensive objective quality measures under various noisy environments.

🔖

Cite This Article

CHOWDHURY, M. F. A., ALAM, M. F., ALAM, M. J. (2022). Comparative study of a priori signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) estimation approaches for speech enhancement. Istanbul University Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 807–817. https://ajindex.com/articles/543726

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Lim J.S., Oppenheim A.V., “Enhancement and bandwidth compression of noisy speech”, Proc. IEEE, Vol: 67, pp. 1586- 1604, 1979
  2. Boll S.F., “Suppression of acoustic noise in speech using spectral subtraction,” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Vol: 27, No. 2, pp. 113–120, 1979
  3. McAulay R.J., Malpass M.L., “Speech enhancement using a soft-decision noise suppression filter,” IEEE Trans. Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Vol: 28, pp. 137– 145, 1980
  4. Y. Ephraim, Malah D., “Speech enhancement using a minimum mean-square error short-time spectral amplitude estimator,” IEEE Trans. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Vol: 32, pp. 1109–1121, 1984
  5. Cappe O., “Elimination of the musical noise phenomenon with the Ephraim and Malah noise suppressor,” IEEE Trans. Speech and Audio Processing, Vol: 2, No. 1, pp. 345–349, April 1994
  6. Plapous C., Marro C., Laurent Mauuary and Pascal Scalart, “A Two Step Noise Reduction Technique”, IEEE Trans. Acoustic, Speech and Signal Processing, Vol: 1, pp. 289–292, 2004
  7. Scalart P., Filho J.V., “Speech Enhancement Based on a Priori Signal to Noise Estimation,” IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Proc., pp. 629–632, 1996
  8. Cohen I., “Speech Enhancement using a Noncausal A Priori SNR Estimator”, IEEE signal processing letters, Vol: 11, No. 9, pp. 725-728, September 2004
  9. Ou S., Zhao X., Gao Y., “Speech Enhancement Employing Modified A Priori SNR Estimation”, Proc. of 8th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking, and Parallel/Distributed Computing, pp. 827-831, July-August, 2007
  10. Hansen J.H.L., Pellom B. L., “An effective evaluation protocol for speech enhancement algorithms,” in Proc. ICSLP, Vol: 7, Sydney, Australia, 1998, pp. 2819–2822
  11. Bayya A., Vis M., “Objective Measures for Speech Quality Assessment in Wireless Communications”, Proc. of IEEE international conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Vol: 1, pp. 495–498, 1996
  12. Vaseghi S.V., Advanced Signal Processing and Digital Noise Reduction, John Wiley and Teubner, 1996
  13. Quackenbush S.R., Barnwell T.P., Clements M.A., Objective measures of speech quality. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1988
  14. Chen J., Banesty J., Huang Y., “On the optimal linear filtering techniques for noise reduction”, Speech communication, Vol: 39, pp. 305-316, 2007
  15. Chen J., Banesty J., Huang Y., Declo S., “New Insights i