Journals / Istanbul University Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering / 2011 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

An improved differential evolution algorithm for optimal load dispatch in power systems including transmission losses

Pages
1379–1390
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The proposed method seems to be a promising approach for ELD problems based on the solution quality and the computational efficiency.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper presents an Improved Differential Evolution (IDE) algorithm to solve Economic Load Dispatch (ELD) problem with non-smooth fuel cost curves con- sidering transmission losses, power balance and capacity constraints.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The initial population in IDE is generated through the concept of Opposition Based Learning (OBL), applies tournament based mutation and uses only one population set throughout the optimization process.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The proposed method seems to be a promising approach for ELD problems based on the solution quality and the computational efficiency.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper presents an Improved Differential Evolution (IDE) algorithm to solve Economic Load Dispatch (ELD) problem with non-smooth fuel cost curves con- sidering transmission losses, power balance and capacity constraints. The proposed IDE varies from the Standard Differential Evolution (SDE) algorithm in terms of three basic factors. The initial population in IDE is generated through the concept of Opposition Based Learning (OBL), applies tournament based mutation and uses only one population set throughout the optimization process. The performance of the proposed algorithm is investigated and tested with two standard test systems, the IEEE 30 bus 6 unit system and the 20 unit system. The experiments showed that the searching ability and convergence rate of IDE is much better than the SDE. The results of the proposed approach were compared in terms of fuel cost, computational time, power loss and individual generator powers with existing SDE and other meta-heuristics in literature. The proposed method seems to be a promising approach for ELD problems based on the solution quality and the computational efficiency.

🔖

Cite This Article

SUMATHI, S. S. P. (2022). An improved differential evolution algorithm for optimal load dispatch in power systems including transmission losses. Istanbul University Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 1379–1390. https://ajindex.com/articles/543696

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Lakshmi Devi A., Vamsi Krishna O. “Com- bined economic and emission dispatch using Evolutionary algorithms-a case study.” ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 3, no. 6, 28-35, 2008
  2. C.L., Wadhwa. Electrical Power Systems. New Delhi: New Age International (p) Limited Pub- lishers, 2000
  3. Lowery, P. G. “Generation unit commitment by dynamic programming.” IEEE Trans. Power App.Syst., vol. PAS-102, 1218–1225, 1983
  4. Wilson, J. A. Muckstadt and R. C. “An applica- tion of mixed-integer programming duality to scheduling thermal generating systems.” IEEE Trans. Power App. Syst vol. PAS-87, no. 12, 1968-1978, 1968
  5. Yoshimura, A. I. Cohen and M. “A branch-and- bound algorithm for unit commitment.” IEEE Trans. Power App. Syst. vol. PAS-102, no. 2, 444–451, 1983
  6. J. B. Park, K. S. Lee, J. R. Shin and K. Y. Lee. “A particle swarm optimization for economic dispatch with non smooth cost functions.” IEEE Trans. on Power Systems vol. 8, no. 3, 1325- 1332, August 1993
  7. Wood J., Wollenberg B. F. Power generation operation and control. John Wiley & Sons, 1984
  8. Rayapudi, S. Rao. “An Intelligent Water Drop Algorithm for Solving Economic Load Dis- patch Problem.” International Journal of Elec- trical and Electronics Engineering vol. 5, no. 1, 43-49, 2011
  9. H. T. Yang, P. C. Yang and C. L. Huang. “Evo- lutionary Programming Based Economic Dis- patch For Units With Non-smooth Fuel Cost Functions.” IEEE Transactions on Power Sys- tems vol. 11, no. 1, 112-118, 1996
  10. T. Jayabarathi, G. Sadasivam and V. Ramach- andran. “Evolutionary programming based economic dispatch of generators with prohib- ited operating zones.” Electric Power Systems Research vol. 52, no. 3, 261-266, 1999
  11. Glover, Z. X. Liang and J. D. “A zoom feature for a dynamic programming solution to eco- nomic dispatch including transmission losses.” IEEE Trans. on Power Systems vol. 7, no. 2, 544-550, May 1992
  12. Lin, C.-T. Su and C.-T. “New approach with a Hopfield modeling framework to economic dispatch.” IEEE Trans. Power Syst. vol.15, no. 2, 541, May 2000
  13. G. Damousis, A. G. Bakirtzis, and P. S. Do- kopoulos. “Network-constrained economic dispatch using real-coded genetic algorithm.” IEEE Trans. Power Syst. vol. 18, no. 1, 198– 205, Feb 2003
  14. W.-M. Lin, F.-S. Cheng, and M.-T. Tsay. “An improved tabu search for economic dispatch with multiple minima.” IEEE Trans. Power Syst vol. 17, 108 – 112, February 2002
  15. Wong, K. P. Wong and Y. W. “Genetic and