Journals / Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi / 1989 / Cilt: 109 - Sayı: 109

STRATIGRAPHY OF THE MUŞ TERTIARY BASIN

Pages
51–51
Publication Date
1989-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The Uppermost Pliocene-Quaternary basin represented by lacustrine and fluvial deposites of Bulanık formation, tuffites of Nemrut formation, sandstone and conglomerates of Muş Ovası formation and Holocene alluvial deposites.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Muş Tertiary basin is composed of independently developed basins which are the Middle-Late Eocene, Uppermost Eocene-Early Miocene, Middle-Late Miocene, Pliocene and Uppermost Pliocene-Quaternary in age.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the Pliocene basin, basaltic andesites, agglomerates and tuffites of Solhan formation and lacustrine deposites of Zırnak formation are developed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The Uppermost Pliocene-Quaternary basin represented by lacustrine and fluvial deposites of Bulanık formation, tuffites of Nemrut formation, sandstone and conglomerates of Muş Ovası formation and Holocene alluvial deposites.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The Muş Tertiary basin is composed of independently developed basins which are the Middle-Late Eocene, Uppermost Eocene-Early Miocene, Middle-Late Miocene, Pliocene and Uppermost Pliocene-Quaternary in age. The Middle-Late Eocene basin is represented the detritics of Kızılağaç formation. The Uppermost Eocene-Early Miocene basin comprises the transgressive detritics of Uppermost Eocene Ahlat formation at the bottom. The upper part of this formation is composed of intercalated continental and marine detritics. Upwards the calcareous detritic rocks of Gerisor formation and detritics of Norkavak formation are seen. Above them Middle-Late Oligocene Yazla formation composed of marine detritic and calcareous rocks is exposed. The sequences varies upwards, to rhyolitic volcanic rocks of the Uppermost Oligocene of Sergen formation of which the exposures are few. On top of the above mentioned rocks, regressive detritic and calcareous rocks of Adilcevaz formation of Uppermost Oligocene-Eaiiy Miocene are exposed. In the Middle-Late Miocene basin, the rocks are developed under the conditions which caused the deformation of the previous basin and is represented by acidic volcanics of Elçiler formation. In the Pliocene basin, basaltic andesites, agglomerates and tuffites of Solhan formation and lacustrine deposites of Zırnak formation are developed. The Uppermost Pliocene-Quaternary basin represented by lacustrine and fluvial deposites of Bulanık formation, tuffites of Nemrut formation, sandstone and conglomerates of Muş Ovası formation and Holocene alluvial deposites.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKAY, E., ERKAN, E., ÜNAY, E. (1989). STRATIGRAPHY OF THE MUŞ TERTIARY BASIN. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, Cilt: 109 - Sayı: 109, 51–51. https://ajindex.com/articles/54366

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Baştuğ, M.C., 1980, Sedimentation, deformation and melange emplacement in Lice Basin, Dijle-Karabegan area, SouthEast Turkey: The Department of Geological Engineering of the Middle East Technical University, these of Doctor of Philosophy, 282 s, yayımlanmamış. i Birgili, Ş., 1968, Muş bölgesi l: 25 000 ölçekli J 48 d3, d4 ve Muş K 47 b2 paftalarının detay petrol etüdü hakkında rapor: MTA Rap., 1707 (yayımlanmamış), Ankara.
  2. Çağlayan, A.; İnal, N.R.; Şengün M. ve Yurtsever, A., 1983, Structural setting of Bitlis Masif: Tekeli, O. ve Göncüoğlu, M.C., ed., Geology of Taurus Belt da., International Symposium 26-29
  3. September, Ankara.
  4. Demirtaşlı, E. ve Pisoni, C., 1965, Ahlat-Adilcevaz bölgesinin jeolojisi (Van gölü kuzeyi): MTA Derg., 64, 22-23,
  5. Ankara.
  6. Dinçer, A., 1969, Muş K 47 bo paftasının jeolojisi, MTA Rap., 4575 (yayımlanmamış), Ankara.
  7. Elnaif, S., 1969, Muş kuzey sahasının petrol etüdü raporu (1: 25 000 ölçekli Erzurum J 47 d4, Muş K 47 a1 K 47 a4 K 46 b3, K 46 b4, K 46 a3, K 47 a3, K47 d2, K 48 a4, K 48 d1, paftaları): MTA Rap., 4296 (yayımlanmamış), Ankara.
  8. Göncüoğlu, C. ve Turhan, N., 1983, Geology of the Bitlis Metamorphic belt: Tekeli, O. ve Göncüoğlu, M.C., ed, Geology of Taurus Belt da., International Symposium 26-29 September, 1983,
  9. Ankara.
  10. Güner, Y., 1984, Nemrut yanardağının jeolojisi, jeomorfolojisi ve volkanizmasmın evrimi: Jeomorfoloji Derg., 12, 23-65.
  11. İlker, S., 1967, Erzurum-Muş bölgesinde Karaköse J 48 a4 ve J 48 d. paftalarının l: 25 000 ölçekli detay petrol etüdü hakkında rapor: MTA Rap., 4177 (Petrol servisi Rap., 62), (yayımlanmamış), Ankara.
  12. Kıraner, F., 1957,
  13. Van bölgesi, Muş kuzeyi petrol jeolojisi inkişaf etüdü: MTA Rap., 2558 (yayımlanmamış), Ankara. özgül, N. ve Turşucu, A., 1983, Stratigraphy of the Mesozoic carbonate sequence of the Munzur Mountain (Eastern Taurides): Tekeli, O. ve Göncüoğlu, M.C., ed., Geology of Taurus Belt, da., International Symposium, 26-29 September, 1983,
  14. Ankara. özpeker, İ., 1973, Nemrut yanardağının volkanolojik incelemesi: Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknik Araştırma Kurumu Teme] Bilimler Araştırma Grubu, proje no. TBAG-83:İTÜ Maden Fakültesi, İstanbul.
  15. Özyeğin, G., 1968, Muş bölgesi 1: 25 000 ölçekli Erzurum J 47 d3, Muş 47 a2 paftalarının detay petrol etüdü hakkında rapor: MTA Rap., 4129 (yayımlanmamış), Ankara.
  16. Sakınç, M., 1982, Mollababa-Uruman (Muş ili) yöresinin jeolojisi-biyostratigrafisi ve paleontolojisi: İstanbul Yerbilimleri, c 3,1-2.
  17. Soytürk, N., 1973, Murat baseni jeolojisi ve hidrokarbo