Journals / Istanbul University Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering / 2015 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

COST FUNCTIONS FOR TWO-METRIC QUALITY OF SERVICE ROUTING

Pages
1913–1919
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Ourresults show an eflicient way to balance the efirects ofthe metrics in the context of many-to-many routing.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Diflerent metrics are usedfor measuring the goodness ofpacket routing between the source and destinationpairs in communication network.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We consider two metrics, namely delay andpacket loss rate.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Ourresults show an eflicient way to balance the efirects ofthe metrics in the context of many-to-many routing.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Diflerent metrics are usedfor measuring the goodness ofpacket routing between the source and destinationpairs in communication network. One approach is to compute the paths from the measured metric values, which arepredetermined independently according to the network resources. The combination ofsome metrics of different naturesto get composite cost function for the routing process is non-trivial. We consider two metrics, namely delay andpacket loss rate. The first one takes values from the large numbers and the secondfrom the small. We propose somemethods for constructing composite functions of these metrics without any constraints and use them for the shortestpath calculations. We give the numerical results of the proposed composite functions versus the Dijkstra ’s algorithmwith the individual metrics. We spot out the bestfunction according to our computer simulation results. Our compositefunction works for any arbitrary point-to—point networks. To the best of our knowledge, the technique is novel. Ourresults show an eflicient way to balance the efirects ofthe metrics in the context of many-to-many routing.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAPLAN, D. Y. (2022). COST FUNCTIONS FOR TWO-METRIC QUALITY OF SERVICE ROUTING. Istanbul University Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 1913–1919. https://ajindex.com/articles/543646

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. References [1] Hanzo H, L. and Tafazolli, R., “A Survey of QoS Routing Solutions for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks”. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, Vol: 9, No: 2, pp. 50-70, 2007. [2] Yin, C.S., Chaw, L.T., and Yaacob, M., “Hop-by-Hop QoS Routing Using Statistical Distribution-Free Approac ”. Malaysian Journal of Computer Science, Vol: 18 No: 2, pp. 28-37, December 2005. [3] Brunsting, R.J., “Quality of Service Issues in Wireless Networks”, in An essay presented to the University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 1995. [4] Obreja, Ş.G. and Borcoci, E., “Interdomain QoS paths finding based on overlay topology and QoS negotiation approach”. Trends in Telecommunications Technologies, InTech Publisher, pp. 345-365, 2010. [5] Iqbal, M., Wang, X., Li, S., and Ellis, T., “QoS scheme for multimedia multicast communications over wireless mesh networks”. IET Communications, Vol: 4, No: 11, pp. 1312—1324, 2010. [6] Djarallah, N.B., Sauze, N.L., Pouyllau, H., Lahoud, S., and Cousin, B., “Distributed E2E QoS-Based Path Computation Algorithm Over Multiple Inter-Domain Route”, Int. Conf. on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing (3PGCIC), Barcelona, pp. 169-176, 201 1. [7] Ali, N.B., Molnar, M., and Belghith, A., “Multiconstrained QoS Multicast Routing Optimization”, inria00271795, version 10, 2008. [8] Yampolskiy, M., Hommel, W., Lichtinger, B., Fritz, W., and Hamm, M.K., “Multi-Domain End-to-End (E2E) Routing with multiple QoS Parameters-Considering Real World User Requirements and Service Provider Constraints”, Second International Conference on Evolving Internet HNTERNED, Valcencia, pp. 9-18, 2010. [9] Bertrand, G., Lahoud, S., Texier, G., and Molnâr, M., “Computation of Multi-Constrained Paths in Multi-Domain NEPLS-TE Networks”, Next Generation Internet Networks, Aveiro, pp.1-8, 2009. [10] Masip-Bruin, X., Yannuzzi, M., Serral-Grâcia, R., DomingoPascual, J., Enriquez—Gabeiras, J., Callejo, M.A., Diaz, M., Racaru, F., Stea, G., Mingozzi, E., Beben, A., Burakowski, W., Monteiro, E., and Cordeiro, L., “The EquS System: Solution for QoS Routing in Heterogeneous Networks”. IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 96-103, 2007. [11] Shin, D.-w., Chong, E.K.P., and Siegel, H.J., “Multipostpath—based lookahead multiconstraint QoS Routing”. Journal of the Franklin Institute, Vol: 349, No: 3, pp. 1106— 1124, 2012. [12] Xue, Q. and Ganz, A., “Ad hoc QoS on-demand routing (AQOR) in mobile ad hoc networks”. Journal ofParallel and Distributed Computing, Vol: 63, pp. 154-165,