Journals / Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi / 1989 / Cilt: 109 - Sayı: 109

THE STRATIGRAPHY AND GEOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE CARBONATE PLATFORM IN THE POZANTI-KARSANTI-KARAİSALI (EAST TAURUS) AREA

Pages
25–36
Publication Date
1989-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Today, tectonic activity still is going on in the form of a normal block faulting.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The basement of the investigated area is composed of the Karahamzauşağı formation of Paleozoic (Permo-Carboniferous) age.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Mesozoic is represented mainly by calcareous Demirkazık formation (Jurassic-Upper Cretaceous) and pelagic foraminifera bearing Yavça formation (Campanian-Maastrichtian).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Today, tectonic activity still is going on in the form of a normal block faulting.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The basement of the investigated area is composed of the Karahamzauşağı formation of Paleozoic (Permo-Carboniferous) age. The Mesozoic is represented mainly by calcareous Demirkazık formation (Jurassic-Upper Cretaceous) and pelagic foraminifera bearing Yavça formation (Campanian-Maastrichtian). The Tertiary succession developed on an irregular paleotopographyof the Paleozoic-Mesozoic aged lithostratigraphic units. In the Tertiary succession, lateral and vertical transitions are quite common within short distances the terrestrial Gildirli formation (Oligocene-Lower Miocene) is found at the base of the Tertiary succession. The lacustrine Karsantı formation overlies the Gildirli formation. In the Lower Miocene, the Kaplankaya formation of shallow water-beach elastics and the Karaisali formation of reefal carbonates developed during a progressive transgression of the sea from the south. Fore reef facies of the reefal Karaisalı formation is represented by the Güvenç formation which is composed mainly of deep marine shales and marls.Turbiditic Cingöz formation developed due to the high sediment influx to the investigated area. The compressional forces were dominant during the evolution of the study area through the considered period. The Kızıldağ melange and the Faraşa ophiolite were emplaced on the platform which was stable till Maastrichtian, during which northern and northeastern parts of the platform had uplifted and the sea had retreated towards the south and southwest. Today, tectonic activity still is going on in the form of a normal block faulting.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRKOL, C. (1989). THE STRATIGRAPHY AND GEOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE CARBONATE PLATFORM IN THE POZANTI-KARSANTI-KARAİSALI (EAST TAURUS) AREA. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, Cilt: 109 - Sayı: 109, 25–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/54364

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abaci, Ş., 1986, Çukurova baseni Karsantı yöresi genç Tersiyer istifinin kil mineralojisi: Ç.Ü. Fen Bilimleri Enst., 94, 59, Adana. Abdüsselamoğlu, M.Ş., 1962, Kayseri—Adana arasındaki Doğu Toroslar Bölgesinin jeolojisi hakkında rapor: MTA Rep., 3262, 33 (unpublished), Ankara.
  2. Anıl, M.; Özüş, S.and Billor.Z., 1986, Gerdibi-Gertepe-Çataltepe—Çeştepe (Pozantı—Karsantı—Adana) kromit yataklarının jeolojik, metalojenik v e ekonomik incelenmesi:TÜBİTAK, Matematik, Fizik v e Biyolojik Bilimler Araştirma Grubu, Project nu: TBAG-667, 131. Arpat, E. and Şaroğlu, F., 1975, Türkiye'deki bazı önemli genç tektonik olaylar: TJK, Bull.,18,91-101.
  3. Blumenthal, M.M., 1952, Toroslar'da yüksek Aladağ silsilesinin coğrafyası, stratigrafisi ve tektoniği hakkında yeni etütler: MTA Publ., ser: D, 6, 136, Ankara.
  4. Brunn, J.H.; Dumont, J.H.; Graciansky, P.C.H.; Gutnic, M.; Juteau, T.; Marcoux, J.; Monod, O. and Poisson, A., 1971, Outline of the geology of the Western Taurids; Campbell, A.S., Ed., Geology and history of Turkey: Pet. Expl. Soc. Libya Tripoli, 225-255.
  5. Çakır, Ü., 1978, Petrologie du massif de Pozantı—Karsantı (Taurus Cilicien, Turquie): Etude de la partie centrals, These 3 eme cyl, 251,Strasbourg., Gedik, A.Birgili, Ş.; Yılmaz, H. and Yoldaş, R., 1979: Mut Ermenek—Silifke yöresinin jeolojisi ve petrol olanakları: TJK Bull., 22, 1,7-27.
  6. İlker, S., 1975, Adana baseni kuzeybatısının jeolojisi ve petrol olanakları: TPAO Arama Arşiv Rep. nu: 973, 63 (unpublished), Ankara.
  7. Juteau, T., 1979, Ophiolites des Taurides:Essai sur leur historie oceanique, Revue de Geologie Dynamique de Geographic Physique, 21, 3, 191-214,
  8. Paris. Monod, O. and Erdoğan, T., 1981, Namrun Yöresinin yapısı üzerine on rapor: TPAO Arama Arşiv Rep. nu. 1662, (unpublished). Özgül, N., 1976, Toroslar'ın bazı temel jeoloji özellikleri: TJK Bull., 19,65-78.
  9. Ricou, L.E., 1980, Toroslar'ın Helenidler ve Zagridler arasındaki yapısal rolü:TJK Bull., 23,2, 101-118.
  10. Tekeli, O.; Aksay, A.; Ertan, I.E.; Işık, A. and Ürgün, B.M., 1981,
  11. Toros Ofiyolit Projeleri, Aladağ Projesi: MTA Rep., 6976, 133, (unpublished), Ankara. —;; Ürgün, B.M. and Işık, A., 1984, Geology of the Aladağ Mountains: Geology of the Taurus Belt, Tekeli, O. and Göncüoğlu, C.M., Ed., 143-158,
  12. Ankara.
  13. Ünlügenç U.C. and Demirkol, C., 1987, Kızıldağ Yayla (Adana) dolayının Stratigrafisi: TMMOB Jeoloji Mühendisleri Odası Publ. (inpress). Wilson, J.L., 1975, Carbonate Facies in Geologic History: Springer—Verlag, Berlin—Heidelberg, 471. Yetiş, C., 1978,