Journals / Istanbul University Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering / 2015 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

MODELING OF GRAVITY ANOMALIES DUE TO 2D GEOLOGICALSTRUCTURES USING GENETIC ALGORITHM

MODELING OF GRAVITY ANOMALIES DUE TO 2D GEOLOGICAL STRUCTURES USING GENETIC ALGORITHM

Pages
1929–1935
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

After demonstrate thereliability of the technique, proposed method is applied to Sivas-Gurun basin and the anomaly of the model has only0.1 mGal ME.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, new modeling technique is introduced using Genetic Algorithm (GA).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Mean Errors WES) of these two syntheticmodes are 0.087 mGal and 0.073 mGal respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:After demonstrate thereliability of the technique, proposed method is applied to Sivas-Gurun basin and the anomaly of the model has only0.1 mGal ME.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this paper, new modeling technique is introduced using Genetic Algorithm (GA). In this method, Geneticalgorithm (GA) is modified and used as an optimization method in geophysics applications. The problem at hand is tofind the best modelfor the cross-section, which its anomalies fit the observed ones. Optimization methods are generallyused in inversion problems to find some parameters, which describe underground structures. The model shape islimited with the chosen parameters. In our modeling technique, firstly, cross section is divided into prismatic pieces.Then, genetic algorithm finds models in each generation, which have geometries constitute ofprismatic structures, andobtains the best model thatfits its anomaly to the observed one. In this process, the density diflerences of each prismaticpiece are assumed to be constant. Therefore, the model obtained by using GA, the structure is shape independent.Moreover, any kind of structure can be modeled with the proposed method using constant density difference forunderground structure. We give two synthetic examples; thefirst one is type and the other one is basin model. Basedon the anomalies with acceptable errors, GA finds the models satisfactory. Mean Errors WES) of these two syntheticmodes are 0.087 mGal and 0.073 mGal respectively. Then, Godavari Valley models of [1], [2] are considered tocompare our proposed modeling technique. Our model is found to be similar to these models. After demonstrate thereliability of the technique, proposed method is applied to Sivas-Gurun basin and the anomaly of the model has only0.1 mGal ME.

🔖

Cite This Article

OSMAN, O., ALBORA, A. M. (2022). MODELING OF GRAVITY ANOMALIES DUE TO 2D GEOLOGICALSTRUCTURES USING GENETIC ALGORITHM. Istanbul University Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 1929–1935. https://ajindex.com/articles/543634

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Bhaskara Rae, D. (1990), Analysis Q’ Gravity Anomalies Q‘ Sedimentary Basins By An Asymmetrical Trapezoidal Model With Quadratic Density Function. Geophysics 55, 226-231. [2] Bhaskara Rao, V. And Venkateswarulu, PD. (1974), Simple Method Of Interpreting Gravity Anomalies Over Sedimentary Basins. Gegphfiical Research Letters 12, 177- 182. [3] Cavicchio, DJ. (1970), Adaptive Search Using Simulated Evolution. Ph.D. University Of Michigan. [4] Davis, L. (1987), Genetic Algorithms And Simulated Annealing. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc. [5] Davis, L. (1991), Handbook On Genetic Algorithms. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York. [6] Goldberg, DE. (1989),
  2. Genetic Algorithms In Search, Optimization, And Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley Publish Co., Inc. [7] Buckles, B.P. And Petry, F.E. (1992), Genetic Algorithms. Ieee Computer Society Press Technical Series. [8] Wright, A.H. 1991. Genetic Algorithms For Real Parameteer Optimization, Presented At The Foundation of Genetic Algorithms. Stoffa, P.L. And Sen, M.K. 1991. Nonlinear Multiparameter Optimization Using Genetic Algorithms. Inversion OfPlaneWave Seismograms, Geophysics 56, 1794-1810.
  3. Jin, S. And Madariaga, R. (1993), Background Velocity Inversion Wıth Genetic Algorithm Gegphfiical Research Letters 20, 93-969.
  4. Billing, S., Kennett, B. And Sambridge, M. (1994), Hypocentre Location: Genetic Algorithm Incorporating Problem Specific Information, Geophysical Journal International 118, 693-706.
  5. Boschetti, F., Dentith, M. And List, R. (1995), Staged Genetic Algorithm For Tomographic Inversion ©” Seismic Refraction Data, Exploration Geophysics 25, 173-178.
  6. Boschetti, F. (1995), Application Of Genetic Algorithms To The Inversion Of Geophysical Data, Ph.D. Thesis In Mathematical Geophysics, University Of Western Australia Boschetti, F., Dentith, M. And List, (1996), Inversion Of Seismic Refraction Data Using Genetic Algorithms, Geophysics 61, 1715-1727.
  7. Ucan, O.N., Bilgili, E. And Albora, A.M. 2002. Magnetic Anomaly Separation Using Genetic Cellular Neural Networks, Journal Of The Balkan Gegphjğical Society 3, 65- 70. Hall, J.M. (2004),
  8. Anovel, Real-Valued Genetic Algorithm For Optimizing Radar Absorbing Materials, Nasa Project No: Nasa/Cr—2004-212669.
  9. Telford, W.M., Geldart, L.P., Sheriff, R.E. And Keys, D.A. 1981. Applied Geophysics. Cambridge University Preess, Cambridge. Albora, A.M. (1992), Study Of Gravity Efect Of Diflerent Geometrical Structure With Namograms. Istanbul University, Institute Of Science And Technology,