Journals / Istanbul University Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering / 2016 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Loss Reduction Benefit and Voltage Profile Improvement by Considering Demand Response and Capacitor

Pages
3007–3015
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Here the most important part is modeling the probability ofload, which can say the load ’s behavior is following that most ofthe time in the planning period.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The presence of demand response programs (DRPs) in the distribution systems would certainly affect the power system problems such as capacitor studies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this paper, in order to maximize the loss reduction benefit and voltage profile improvement simultaneously, considering difi'erent percentages ofpeak loads and electricity prices have been studied.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Here the most important part is modeling the probability ofload, which can say the load ’s behavior is following that most ofthe time in the planning period.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The presence of demand response programs (DRPs) in the distribution systems would certainly affect the power system problems such as capacitor studies. Some ofthese problems refer to economical and other ones are based on technical limits. Capacitor placement and responsive load installation are challenge that express as the base of distribution system problems which are considered in this paper. In this paper, in order to maximize the loss reduction benefit and voltage profile improvement simultaneously, considering difi'erent percentages ofpeak loads and electricity prices have been studied. Also, probabilistic load model at each load state is assumed in this paper instead ofutilizing time-series based models. Moreover, optimum numbers of capacitors and optimum load reduction by DRP should be used in each load state in order to optimizing the problem. Different scenarios including, individual or simultaneous placing of capacitors and DRPs at each load state have been established and interrogated in depth. Therefore, nondominated genetic algorithm version 11 (NSGA-II) has been used to solve the problems under study. NSGA-H is usedfor typical network by considering possibilities. The effectiveness ofthe proposed scheduling approach verified on IEEE 33-bus distribution test system in the planning period. Here the most important part is modeling the probability ofload, which can say the load ’s behavior is following that most ofthe time in the planning period.

🔖

Cite This Article

SATTARPOUR, T., FARSADI, M., HOSSEINNEJAD, H. (2022). Loss Reduction Benefit and Voltage Profile Improvement by Considering Demand Response and Capacitor. Istanbul University Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 3007–3015. https://ajindex.com/articles/543629

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. P. Siano, “Demand response and smart grids—A survey,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol.30, pp.461—478, 2014
  2. B. Chakrabarti, D. Bullen, C. Edwards, C. Callaghan, “Demand Response in the New Zealand Electricity Market,” in Proc. Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition, IEEE PES, pp.1-7, 2012
  3. Sundhararajan, Srinivasan, and Anil Pahwa. "Optimal selection of capacitors for radial distribution systems using genetic algorithm." IEEE Transactions on Power systems, 9.3 (1994): 1499-1507
  4. Eajal, Abdelsalam, and M. E. El-Hawary. "Optimal capacitor placement and sizing in unbalanced distribution systems with harmonics consideration using particle swarm optimization." IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 25. (2010): 1734-1741
  5. Sirjani, Reza, M. Azah, and Hussain Shareef. "Heuristic optimization techniques to determine optimal capacitor placement and sizing in radial distribution networks: comprehensive review." Przeglqa' Elektrotechniczny (Electr. Rev.) 88.73. (2012): 1-7
  6. Hu, Z. and Li, F., "Cost-benefit analyses of active distribution network management, part i: Annual benefit analysis", IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, Vol. 3, No. 3, (2012), 1067-1074
  7. M. Dougall, P., Heskes, P., Crolla, P., Burt, G. and C. Warmer, "Fast demand response in support of the active distribution network", 22"“Y International Conference and Exhibition on Electricity Distribution, CIRED
  8. Chakrabarti, B., Bullen, D., Edwards, C. and Callaghan, C., "Demand response in the new zealand electricity market", Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition (T&D), IEEE PES, (2012), 1-7
  9. Palensky, P. and Dietrich, D., "Demand side management: Demand response, intelligent energy systems, and smart loads ", IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, Vol. 7, No. 3, (2011), 381-388
  10. Gallego RA, Monticelli AJ, Romero R. "Optimal capacitor placement in radial distribution networ ". IEEE Trans Power iSE/st 2001; 16 (4):630—7
  11. Ng HN, Salama MMA, Chikhani AY. "Classification of capacitor allocation techniques", IEEE Trans Power Deliv 2000;15:387—92
  12. Chians HD, Wang JC, Cockings O, Shin HD Optimal capacitor placement in distribution systems: Part ], Part l] ". IEEE Trans Power Deliv 1990;5(2):643—7
  13. Zakariazadeh, Alireza, Shahram Jadid, and Pierluigi Siano. "Economic-environmental energy and reserve scheduling of smart distribution systems: multiobjective mathematical programming approac." Energy Conversion and