Journals / Istanbul University Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering / 2016 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Effect Of Improving Perturb And Observe Mppt Algorithm On AC Grid Connected Pv Sytems

Pages
3025–3032
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the end, it was evaluated along with simulation, experimental results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Photovoltaic energy systems have an important role in electricity generation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In order to get highest efl‘iciency from photovoltaic systems in dijferent operation conditions, solar panels and arrays should be operated at maximum powerpoints.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the end, it was evaluated along with simulation, experimental results.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Photovoltaic energy systems have an important role in electricity generation. Although photovoltaic systems are renewable, environmentally-friendly, silent and non-fuelled, they still have various disadvantages such as high investment cost and low efi‘iciency. In order to get highest efl‘iciency from photovoltaic systems in dijferent operation conditions, solar panels and arrays should be operated at maximum powerpoints. At maximum powerpoint, solar arrays generate the electric energy at maximum efiiciency and minimum losses. Some algorithms are used in photovoltaic systems to provide maximum efliciency and minimum losses. The perturbation and observation (P&O) algorithm have been well known algorithm. Although it is an easily applicable algorithm, it has important ripple problems when it reaches to maximum power point. This paper introduces an improvement on conventional P&O algorithm to eliminate ripple problem and it applied on grid connected system. In this approach, ripples are eliminated by obtaining reference current value under variable and constant solar irradiation conditions. This algorithm proposes variable power perturbation with fillfactor. In the end, it was evaluated along with simulation, experimental results.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, A. S., ÖZÇELİK, M. A. (2022). Effect Of Improving Perturb And Observe Mppt Algorithm On AC Grid Connected Pv Sytems. Istanbul University Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 3025–3032. https://ajindex.com/articles/543627

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Alcaraz G.G., Galvan E.i Gonzalez N., Javadi M.S., Renewable energy resources short-term scheduling and dynamic network reconfiguration for sustainable energy consumption", Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 52, no. 2015, pp. 256-264. August, 2015.
  2. Thayalan D.T., Lee H., Park J.H., "Low-Cost HighEfficiency Discrete Current Sensing Method Using Bypass Switch for PV Systems", IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol.63, no.4, pp. 769-780, April, 2014.
  3. Koutroulis E., Blaabjerg F., New Technique for Tracking the Global Maximum Power Point of PV Arrays Operating Under Partial-Shading Conditions", IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics,vol.2,no. 2, pp. 184-190. April, 2012. [4] Subudhi B., Pradhan R., Comparative Study on Maximum Power Pointhracking Techniques for Photovoltaic Power Systems", IEEE, Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 89-98. January, 2013.
  4. Nabulsi A., Dhaouadi R., Efficiency Optimization of DSP—Based Standalone PV System Using Fuzzy Logic and Dual-MPPT Control", IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 573—584. August, 2012.
  5. Esram T., Chapman PL., "Comparison of photovoltaic array maximum power point tracking techniques", IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 439- 449, June, 2007.
  6. Özçelik M.A., Yılmaz A.S., "Improving the performance of MPPT in PV systems by modified Perturb-and-Observe algorithm"(DC side), Journal of Engineering Research, vol.3, no.5, pp.-77-96, September, 2015. [8] Guerra A.,Zhang J., "GaN Power Devices for Micro inverters", Power Electronics Europe, Issue 4, page 28-31, June, 2010.
  7. Barchowsky a., Jefli'ey P.P., Grogery F. Reed, Mathew J. Korytowski, Brandon M. Grainger. "A comparative study of mppt methods for distributed photovoltaic generation", IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technology, Washinton, USA, page 1- 7, 16-20 January, 2012.
  8. Pandey A, Dasgupta N, Mukerjee A.K, "A Simple-Sensor MPPT Solution", IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol.22, no.2, pp. 698-700, March, 2007.
  9. Ding IÇ Bian X, Liu H, Peng T, "A Matlab-Simulink—Based PV module Model and Its Application Under Conditions of Non uniform Irradiance", IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol.27, no.4, pp. 864-872, 2012.
  10. Burger, B.; Kranzer, D.; "Extreme high efficiency PV power converters ", Power Electronics andApplications. EPE ’09. 13 th European Conference, Freiburg, Germany, pp. 1-13, 8-10 September, 2009.
  11. Zainuri M., Radzi M., Soh A.C., Rahim N.A., "Development of adaptive