We have achieved 81.81% and 89.29% accuracy rate for arousal and valence respectively.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Emotions play a significant and powerful role in everyday life of human beings.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Developing algorithms for computers to recognize an emotional expression is widely studied area.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We have achieved 81.81% and 89.29% accuracy rate for arousal and valence respectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
Emotions play a significant and powerful role in everyday life of human beings. Developing algorithms for computers to recognize an emotional expression is widely studied area. In this study, emotion recognition from Galvanic Skin Response signals was performed using time domain, wavelet and Empirical Mode Decomposition based features. Valence and arousal have been categorized and relationship between physiological signals and arousal and valence has been studied using k-Nearest Neighbors, Decision Tree, Random Forest and Support Vector Machine algorithms. We have achieved 81.81% and 89.29% accuracy rate for arousal and valence respectively.
🔖
Cite This Article
YASLAN, Y., AYATA, D., KAMASAK, M. (2022). EMOTION RECOGNITION VIA GALVANIC SKIN RESPONSE: COMPARISON OF MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS AND FEATURE EXTRACTION METHODS. Istanbul University Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1, 3129–3136. https://ajindex.com/articles/543586
N. Sebe, I.Cohen, and T. S. Huang, “Multimodal Emotion Recognition”, WSPC, June 18, 2004 [2] P. Ekman, R.W.Levenson,, W.V. Friesen, “Autonomic nervous system activity distinguishing among emotions”, Science 221, 1208– 1210., 1983 [3] Shimmer, “Measuring Emotion: Reactions To Media”, Dublin, Ireland, 2015 [4] A. Nakasone, H.Predinger, and M.Ishizuka, “Emotion Recognition from Electromyography and Skin Conductance”, in proc. BSI 2005(2005), 219-222 [5] N. Nourbakhsh, Y. Wang, F. Chen, R. Calvo, “Using Galvanic Skin Response for Cognitive Load Measurement in Arithmetic and Reading Tasks”, ACM 2012 [6] G. Channel, J. Kronegg, D. Grandjean, T. Pun, “Emotion Assessment: Arousal Evaluation Using EEG’s and Peripheral Physiological Signals”, Technical Report, Universite de Geneve, 2005. [7] A.Mehrabian, (1980). “Basic dimensions for a general psychological theory”, pp. 39–53. ISBN 0-89946-004-6. [8] A. Mehrabian; J. A. Russell (1974). “An approach to environmental psychology (1 ed.)”, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. [9] S. Koelstra, C. Muehl, M. Soleymani, A. Yazdani, J.-S. Lee, T. Ebrahimi, T. Pun, A. Nijholt, and I. Patras, “DEAP: A Database for Emotion Analysis Using Physiological Signals”, IEEE Trans. Affective Computing, vol. 3, no. 1, pp., Jan- Mar. 2012. [10] A.N. Akansu, W.A. Serdijn, and I.W. Selesnick, “Wavelet Transforms in Signal Processing: A Review of Emerging Applications”, Physical Communication, Elsevier, vol. 3, issue 1, pp. 1–18, March 2010. [11] N. E. Huang, Z. Shen, S. R. Long, M. C. Wu, H. H. Shih, Q. Zheng, N. Yen, C. C. Tung, H. H. Liu, “The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis”, The Royal Society, 1996. [12] X. Yao, X. Sun, Y. Yang, D. Wu, X. Liang, “Features extraction and reconstruction of country risk based on EMD”, Procedia Computer Science, Volume 31, 2014, Pages 265-272. [13] N. V. Davis, “Feature extraction using empirical mode decomposition of speech signal”, International Journa of Engineering Trends and Technology, Volume 3, Issue 2, 2012. [14] F.K. Onay, C. Köse, “Epileptic seizure detection in EEG signals using recurrence plot of intrinsic mode functions”, Eleco 2014,
Bursa, Turkey. [15] S. Cho, Y. Seo, “Extraction of significant features using empirical mode decomposition and its application, WCECS 2013,
San Francisco, USA. [16] Quinlan, J. R. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1993. [17] Ho, Tin Kam. Random Decision Forest