Journals / Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi / 1992 / Cilt: 114 - Sayı: 114

PETROGRAPHY AND ORIGINE OF THE MIDDLE DEVONIAN DOLOMITES (ŞAFAKTEPE FM.) IN THE GEYİKDAĞI UNIT (EAST TAURUS), TUFANBEYLİ-SAİMBEYLİ

Pages
26–26
Publication Date
1992-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Additionally, coarsely crystalline white dolomites (saddle dolomites) precipitated in the dissolution vughs, and subsequently some ore deposits emplaced within the late diagenetic dolomites.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The middle Devonian dolomites exposed in the Autochthonous Geyikdağı unit (East Taurus) had resulted in dotomitization of Amphipora-bearing reefal limestones along with ostracod-algal laminated limestones.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Their isotopic signature (d 180= -2.48 to 0.039‰; d13C= 0.079 to 3.18‰) also fits this dotomitization model.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Additionally, coarsely crystalline white dolomites (saddle dolomites) precipitated in the dissolution vughs, and subsequently some ore deposits emplaced within the late diagenetic dolomites.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The middle Devonian dolomites exposed in the Autochthonous Geyikdağı unit (East Taurus) had resulted in dotomitization of Amphipora-bearing reefal limestones along with ostracod-algal laminated limestones. The dolomitic unit is composed of homogenous, mottled, laminated and banded (zebroid) types of dolomites. Dolomitization took place in the different timing, namely early and late diagenetic. The early diagenetic ones underwent mixing-water diagenesis (marine-fresh water) on a tidal flat environment. Their isotopic signature (d 180= -2.48 to 0.039‰; d13C= 0.079 to 3.18‰) also fits this dotomitization model. The second type, late diagenetic dolomites (epigenetic dolomite) are coarser crystalline than the earlier ones, and their isotopic composition became more negative or greatly diminished (d 180= -10.75 to -8.36‰; 5 C= -0.63 to 1.45‰), this suggests increasing temperature during dolomitization. The late diagenetic dolomitization invoked recrystallization and dissolution of the early diagenetic dolomites. Additionally, coarsely crystalline white dolomites (saddle dolomites) precipitated in the dissolution vughs, and subsequently some ore deposits emplaced within the late diagenetic dolomites.

🔖

Cite This Article

VAROL, B. (1992). PETROGRAPHY AND ORIGINE OF THE MIDDLE DEVONIAN DOLOMITES (ŞAFAKTEPE FM.) IN THE GEYİKDAĞI UNIT (EAST TAURUS), TUFANBEYLİ-SAİMBEYLİ. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, Cilt: 114 - Sayı: 114, 26–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/54299

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Beales, F.W. ve Hardy, J.L. 1980, Criteria for the recognition of diverse dolomite types with an emphasis on studies on hası recks lor Mississippi Valley-Type ere deposits: in Zenger, D.H.: Dunham. J.8., ve Ethington, R.L., eds., Concept and Models of Dolomitization SEPM Special Publ, Na. 28, p. 197-213.
  2. Demirtaşlı, E. 1 967, Pınarbaşı-Sarız-MaQra ilçeleri arasındaki sahanın litostratigrafik birimleri ve petrol imkanları: MTA Rap., 4389 (yayımlanmamış), Ankara.
  3. Degens, E.T., 1 971, Stable isotope distribution in carbonates: in G.V. Chilingar: H.J. 8issel ve R.W. Fairbridge (eds.): Carbonate rocks replacement in Sedimentology 98, Elsevier, Amsterdam. The Nederlands, p. 193-208.
  4. Friedman, G.M. ve Sanders, J.E., 1 967, Origin of occurrence of dolostones: in Chilingar, G.V., 8issel, H.J. ve Fairbridge, R.W., eds., Carbonate rocks, Part A: Origin, Occurrence, and Classification: Amsterdam. Elsevier, p. 167-348.
  5. Gregg, J.M. ve Sibley., 1 984, Epigenetic dolomitization and the origin of xenotopic dolomite texture: Jour. Sed. Petrol., 54, 908-952. Hanshaw, 8.8.; Back, W. ve Deike, R.G. 1 971, A geochemical hypothesis lor dolomitization by groundwater: Econ. Geology,66, 710-724.
  6. Hardie, L.A., 1 986, Dolomitization. A critical view of some current views-perspectives: Jour. Sed. Petrol., 57, 1 66-183.
  7. Lands, S.Y., 1980, The isoıopic data and trace element geochemisııy of dolomite: The state of the art: in O.H. Zenger, J.B. Ounham and A.L. Ethington (Eds), Concept of models of dolomitization, Society of Economic Paleontologist and Mineralogist Special Publication, 28, 87-110. __, 1985, The origin of Massive dolomite: Journal of Geological Educaıion, 33, 112-125.
  8. Maısumoıo, R.; lijima, A. ve Katayama, T., 1988, Mixed-waıer hydrothermal dolomitization of the Pliocene Shirahama Limestone, lzu Peninsula, central Japan: Sedimenıology, 35, 979-999.
  9. Manes. B.W. ve Mounjoy, E.W., 1980, Burial dolomitization of the Upper Oevonian Miette Buildup, Jasper National Park, Alberta: Soc. Econ. Paleontologist an Mineralogist Spec. Publ., No. 28, 259-297.
  10. Metin, S.: Papak, 1. ve Keskin, H., 1982, Tufanbeyli-Sarız ve Göksun Saimbeyli arasının jeolojisi: MTA Rap., 7219 (yayımlanmamış), Ankara.
  11. Osmand, J.C., 1956, Mottled carbonate rocks in the Middle Oevonian of eastern Nevada: Jour. Sediment Petrol. 26, 32-41.
  12. Özgül, N., 1976, Torosların bazı temel jeolojik özellikleri: Türkiye Jeo. Kur. Bült., 16, 82-100.
  13. Radke, B.M. ve Mathis, R.L., 1980, On the formation and occurrence of sad