Journals / Istanbul Business Research / 2021 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 1

Relationship Between Sustainability Report, Financial Performance, and Ownership Structure: Research on The Turkish Banking Sector

Pages
77–102
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results obtained from the research, the sustainability score of banks was not effective based on their financial performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The financial statements of companies have been evaluated in financial performance analysis for many years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Another aim of the study is to determine the relationship between the sustainability score of banks, financial performance indicators, and ownership structure.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results obtained from the research, the sustainability score of banks was not effective based on their financial performance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013-2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The financial statements of companies have been evaluated in financial performance analysis for many years. However, today, investors and business stakeholders, who want to invest in businesses, demand not only the information presented in financial statements, but also non-financial information to see future status and test whether it have a sustainable structure. In this context, the reporting of information on the economic, social, and environmental dimensions of businesses is possible through sustainability reporting. The purpose of this study is to reveal the sustainability scores of banks operating in the Turkish Banking sector. Another aim of the study is to determine the relationship between the sustainability score of banks, financial performance indicators, and ownership structure. In the study, the compliance scores of banks along with a sustainability report determined the framework of criteria for sustainability reports standardized by the GRI. From 2013-2018, the data of 10 banks that published sustainability reports in the Turkish Banking Sector were analysed. According to the results obtained from the research, the sustainability score of banks was not effective based on their financial performance. On the other hand, an increase in the shares of the largest shareholder capital caused a decrease in the sustainability scores of banks.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞAN, M., KESER, M. (2022). Relationship Between Sustainability Report, Financial Performance, and Ownership Structure: Research on The Turkish Banking Sector. Istanbul Business Research, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 1, 77–102. https://ajindex.com/articles/542747

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aggarwal, P. (2013). Impact of sustainability performance of company on its financial performance: a study of listed Indian companies, Global Journal of Management and Business Research Finance, 13(11), 61- 70. Akyüz, F. & Yeşil, T. (2017). BIST sürdürülebilirlik endeksine kayıtlı üretim sektöründe faaliyet gösteren şirketlerin finansal performanslarının incelenmesi, Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi, 9(6), 61-78.
  2. Aman, Z. & Ismail, S. (2017). The determinants of corporate sustainability reporting: Malaysian evidence, Proceeding of the 4th International Conference on Management and Muamalah 2017 (ICoMM 2017), e-ISBN: 978-967-2122-15-9.
  3. Ameer, R. & Othman, R. (2012). Sustainability practises and corporate financial performance: a study based on the top global corporations, Journal Business Ethics, 108, 61-79.
  4. Angelstig, M. & Gustavsson, S. (2016). The effect of ownership structure on the sustainability reporting assurance practice. Stockholm School of Economics, Derpartment of Accounting, Master Thesis in Accounting and Financial Management. Aktan, C.C. & Börü, D. (2007). Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk. İstanbul:
  5. İGİAD Yayınları.
  6. Altınay, A.T. (2016). Entegre raporlama ve sürdürülebilirlik muhasebesi, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2016/3(25), 47-64.
  7. Aras, G. & Sarıoğlu, G.U. (2015). Kurumsal raporlamada yeni dönem: entegre raporlama. TÜSİAD Yayını. Arayssi, M., Dah, M. & Jizi, M. (2016). Women on boards, sustainability reporting and firm performance, Sustainabilty Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(3), 376-401.
  8. Arsoy, A., Arabacı, Ö. & Çiftçioğlu, A. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance relationship: the case of Turkey, Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, Ocak, 159-176.
  9. Balal, A. (2000). Environmental reporting in developing countries: empirical evidence from Bangladesh, Eco Management and Auditing, 7(3), 114-121.
  10. Başar, A.B. (2014). Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk raporlaması ve finansal performans arasındaki ilişki: Borsa İstanbul’da işlem gören kimya-petrol-plastik sektörü şirketleri üzerine bir araştırma, Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 21(2), 59-72.
  11. Becchetti, L., Di Giacomo, S. & Pinnacchio, D. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and corporate performance: evidence from a panel of US listed companies, Applied Economics, 40(5), 541-567.
  12. Bruntland, G.H. (1987). Report of the world commission on enviroment and development: our common future, Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org