Journals / Istanbul Business Research / 2021 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2

Does It Matter How to Fund?: A Research on Turkish Deposit Banks

Pages
359–383
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, the banks’ performance is affected by several liability structure variables.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Aim of this paper is to examine the possible relationship between liability structure and bank performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, panel data regression method is used to analyze relationship between bank performance and liability structure of banks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, the banks’ performance is affected by several liability structure variables.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2005-2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Banks’ Liability Structure · Fund Preference · Turkish Deposit Banks

Abstract

The Aim of this paper is to examine the possible relationship between liability structure and bank performance. In this context, panel data regression method is used to analyze relationship between bank performance and liability structure of banks. The main data source in this study is The Banks Association of Turkey’s banking statistics between 2005-2018. In the analysis, liability preferences of Turkish banks are used as independent variables and CAMELS performance scores of banks are used as dependent variable. Additionally, variables that are admitted in literature as bank performance determinants are taken into consideration in bank performance model as control variables. According to the results, the banks’ performance is affected by several liability structure variables. Use of loans-especially long term loans- and to have high saving deposits/total deposits positively affect bank performance; while extensive use of non-deposit liabilities, third alternative liability sources, long-term deposits, and foreign currency loansnegatively affect bank performance. As with other liability structure variables, high capital adequacy ratio and leverage also have negative effect on bank performance. Moreover, as control variables GDP per capita, inflation rate, interest rate, bank size, bank efficiency, bank liquidity, bank risk and bank market share have a statistically significant effect on bank performance.

🔖

Cite This Article

TEKŞEN, Ö., ÇELİK, M. (2022). Does It Matter How to Fund?: A Research on Turkish Deposit Banks. Istanbul Business Research, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2, 359–383. https://ajindex.com/articles/542745

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Adams, R.B., Mehran, H. (2008).
  2. Corporate Performance, Board Structure, and Their Determinants in the Banking Industry. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports, No. 330. Alper, D., Anbar, A. (2014). Bank Specific and Macroeconomic Determinants of Commercial Bank Profitability: Empirical Evidence from Turkey. Business and Economics Research Journal, 2(2), 139-152.
  3. Ata, H.A.(2009). Kriz Sonrası Türkiye’de Mevduat Bankaları Kârlılığına Etki Eden Faktörler, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(2), 137-151.
  4. Athanasoglou, P.P., Brissimis, S.N., Delis, M.D. (2008).
  5. Bank-Specific, Industry-Specific and Macroeconomic Determinants of Bank Profitability. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 18(2), 121-136.
  6. Barros, C.P., Ferreira, C. Williams, J. (2007). Analysing the Determinants of Performance of Best and Worst European Banks: A Mixed Logit Approach. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(7), 2189-2203.
  7. Battal, A.,(2004),
  8. Bankalar Kanunu Şerhi, Sorularla Banka Hukuku, Gazi Press:
  9. Ankara.
  10. Beck, N., Katz, J.N. (1995). What To Do (and Not To Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data. The American Political Science Review, 89(3):634-647.
  11. Belete, T.(2013). Asset Liability Management and Commercial Banks Profitability in Ethiopia, Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, (4)10, 77-91.
  12. Berg, S. A., F. R. Forsund, and E. S. Jansen (1992). Malmquist Indices of Productivity Growth During the Deregula tion of Norwegian Banking 1980-1989, Scandanavian Journal of Economics, 94, 211-228.
  13. Berger, A.N. (1995), The Relationship Between Capital and Earnings in Banking, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, (27)2, 432-456.
  14. Bertin, M. J., Moya, J.A., Perales, A.R. (2014). Determinants of Bank Performance: Evidence for Latin America. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 27(2), 164-182.
  15. Cole, R.A., White, L.J. (2012). Déjà Vu All Over Again: The Causes of U.S. Commercial Bank Failures This Time Around, Journal of Financial Services Research,(42), 5-29.
  16. Ceylan, A., Korkmaz, T.,(2014),
  17. Finansal Teknikler, Ekin Press:
  18. Bursa. Çelik, M. (2018a). Türkiye’de Faaliyet Gösteren Mevduat Bankalarının Performans Analizi: Büyüklük ve Sahiplik Yapısı Ayrımıyla Bir Karşılaştırma. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Adminstrative Sciences Faculty, 5(2), 146-168.
  19. Çelik, M. (2018b). Bankaların Yabancı Fon Kaynakları ve Banka Fon Kaynak Tercihinin Banka Performansına Etkisi: Türkiye’deki Mevduat Bankaları Üzerine bir Araşt