SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Istanbul Business Research / 2021 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2

Linking Dynamic Capabilities and Market Performance of SMEs: The Moderating Role of Organizational Agility

Bülent AKKAYA
Iqbal Qaisar
Pages
197–214
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, managers should account for dynamic capabilities while assessing the effects of it on organizational agility and firm performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The purpose of this study is to highlight the moderating role of organizational agility (OA) between dynamic capabilities (DC) and market performance (MP) in SMEs in Turkey and Malaysia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Research Design/Methodology: The data was collected from 198 managers in both countries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, managers should account for dynamic capabilities while assessing the effects of it on organizational agility and firm performance.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Organizational Agility · Dynamic Capabilities · Market Performance

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to highlight the moderating role of organizational agility (OA) between dynamic capabilities (DC) and market performance (MP) in SMEs in Turkey and Malaysia. Research Design/Methodology: The data was collected from 198 managers in both countries. The data was analyzed by Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). Findings: The research has found that there is significant relationship between organizational agility and market performance, dynamic capabilities and market performance. The finding also reveals that organizational agility has a moderating role between dynamic capabilities and market performance. Practical implications: This research contributes to boosting scientific research, particularly in terms of testing the model content, as well as studying the study variables and the factors affecting them. In addition, this research pointed to the need for organizations to practice organizational agility and dynamic capabilities in order to improve market performance. Originality/value: Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility vary according to environmental dynamism for a firm’s market performance and high levels of dynamic capabilities may lead to upper market performance, as market performance is often more directly tied to SMEs organizational agility. Moreover, managers should account for dynamic capabilities while assessing the effects of it on organizational agility and firm performance.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKKAYA, B., Qaisar, I. (2022). Linking Dynamic Capabilities and Market Performance of SMEs: The Moderating Role of Organizational Agility. Istanbul Business Research, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2, 197–214. https://ajindex.com/articles/542743

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Adeleye, E. O., & Yusuf, Y. Y. (2006). Towards agile manufacturing: models of competition and performance outcomes. International Journal of Agile Systems and Management, 1(1), 93-110. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJASM.2006.008861
  2. Akkaya, B., & Tabak, A. (2018). Örgütsel Çeviklik Ölçeğinin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 5(2), 185-206. https://doi.org/10.18394/iid.439184
  3. Allred, C. R., Fawcett, S. E., Wallin, C., & Magnan, G. M. (2011). A dynamic collaboration capability as a source of competitive advantage. Decision sciences, 42(1), 129-161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00304.x
  4. Ambler, T., Kokkinaki, F., & Puntoni, S. (2004). Assessing marketing performance: reasons for metrics selection. Journal of Marketing Management, 20(3-4), 475-498. https://doi.org/10.1362/026725704323080506
  5. Augier, M., & Teece, D. J. (2009). Dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in business strategy and economic performance. Organization science, 20(2), 410-421. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0424
  6. Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen Jr, D. J. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of management, 27(6), 625-641. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700601
  7. Bernardes, E. S., & Hanna, M. D. (2009). A theoretical review of flexibility, agility and responsiveness in the operations management literature. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 29(1), 530-533 https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570910925352.
  8. Bezci, H. İ.(2015) Dinamik Kabiliyetlere Sahip İşletmelerin İnovasyon Hızı, Gebze Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü (Master Thesis), GEBZE, KOCAELİ Brown, S., & Bessant, J. (2003). The manufacturing strategy‐capabilities links in mass customisation and agile manufacturing–an exploratory study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 23(7),707-730. ttps://doi.org/10.1108/01443570310481522 Cao, Q., & Dowlatshahi, S. (2005). The impact of alignment between virtual enterprise and information technology on business performance in an agile manufacturing environment. Journal of Operations Management, 23(5), 531-550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.10.010
  9. Cavusgil, E., Seggie, S. H., & Talay, M. B. (2007). Dynamic capabilities view: Foundations and research agenda. Journal of marketing theory and practice, 15(2), 159-166. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679150205
  10. Cavusgil, S. T., & Knight, G. (2015). The born global firm: An entrepreneurial and ca