Journals / Istanbul Business Research / 2022 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 1

Intellectual Capital and Firm Value: An Investigation of Turkish Manufacturing Companies

Pages
257–277
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Specifically, we find that higher levels of measures of human capital, relational capital, process capital, innovation capital, and overall intellectual capital are directly associated with higher stock prices.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper investigates whether intellectual capital and its components (human, relational, innovation, and process capitals) have meaningful information on firm value.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Full sample consists of 148 listed Turkish manufacturing firms over the period of 2005–2017.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Specifically, we find that higher levels of measures of human capital, relational capital, process capital, innovation capital, and overall intellectual capital are directly associated with higher stock prices.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2005–2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Intellectual Capital · Human Capital · Relational Capital

Abstract

This paper investigates whether intellectual capital and its components (human, relational, innovation, and process capitals) have meaningful information on firm value. Full sample consists of 148 listed Turkish manufacturing firms over the period of 2005–2017. We show that our extended Ohlson models explain the substantial part of the unexplained variation in firm market values. Specifically, we find that higher levels of measures of human capital, relational capital, process capital, innovation capital, and overall intellectual capital are directly associated with higher stock prices. Furthermore, we find that intellectual capital and its components have lagged effects on market values of firms, and human capital has a moderating effect on the relationship between other intellectual capital components and firm market values. Our main finding still holds when we re-estimate our model by addressing potential endogeneity issues and alternative conditions. Based on our findings, we recommend firm managers to do convenient resources planning on these components to raise the firm’s value. Moreover, we recommend accounting standards setters to create a separate financial reporting standard, which includes detailed information on these components that are value-relevant in making business valuation decisions.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAM, İ., ÖZER, G. (2022). Intellectual Capital and Firm Value: An Investigation of Turkish Manufacturing Companies. Istanbul Business Research, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 1, 257–277. https://ajindex.com/articles/542731

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Alfraih, M. M. (2017). The value relevance of intellectual capital disclosure: empirical evidence from Kuwait. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance. 25(1), 22-38.
  2. Al-Hares, O. M., AbuGhazaleh, N. M., & Haddad, A. E. (2011). The effect of 'other information' on equity valuation: Kuwait evidence. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 27(6), 57-70.
  3. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
  4. Barth, M. E. (2000). Valuation‐based accounting research: Implications for financial reporting and opportunities for future research. Accounting & Finance, 40(1), 7-32.
  5. Bayraktaroglu, A. E., Calisir, F., & Baskak, M. (2019). Intellectual capital and firm performance: an extended VAIC model. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20(3), 406-425.
  6. Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M.S. (1997). Intellectual Capital: Realizing your Company’s True Value by Finding its Hidden Brainpower, Harper Business, New York, USA. Eloff, A. M., & de Villiers, C. (2015). The value-relevance of goodwill reported under IFRS 3 versus IAS 22. South African Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2), 162-176.
  7. Etebar, S., & Darabi, R. (2011). The role of the economic value added measure and intellectual capital in financial intermediations market value in Tehran stock exchange (TSE). Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(12), 1926-1933.
  8. Ferraro, O., & Veltri, S. (2011). The value relevance of intellectual capital on the firm’s market value: an empirical survey on the Italian listed firms. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 2(1), 66-84.
  9. Giuliani, M. (2013). Not all sunshine and roses: discovering intellectual liabilities. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14(1), 127-144.
  10. Gülcemal, T., & Çıtak, L. (2017). Entelektüel katma değer katsayısı yöntemi ile ölçülen entelektüel sermayenin firma performansı üzerindeki etkisi. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 18(1), 35-55.
  11. Gümrah, Ü., & Adiloğlu, B. (2011). Value relevance and reliability of goodwill and intangibles on financial statements: the case of Istanbul Stock Exchange. Istanbul University Journal of the School of Business Administration, 40(2), 155-165.
  12. Hitt, M. A., Bierman, L., Shimizu, K., & Kochhar, R. (2001). Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 13-28.
  13. Huang, C. C., Luther, R., Tayles, M., & Hanif