Journals / Istanbul Business Research / 2022 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 1

Engaging with Social Media Influencers on Youtube: A Cluster Analysis

Pages
359–373
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The groups were named as ‘positively active followers,’ ‘passive followers,’ and ‘analytical followers.’ Implications for brand endorsement and content marketing strategies are discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Social media platforms have created a new industry where both influencers and consumers are empowered.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, 341 participants from Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (MTurk) platform participated in an online survey, and a two-step cluster analysis was conducted with eleven common social media engagement practices with influencers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The groups were named as ‘positively active followers,’ ‘passive followers,’ and ‘analytical followers.’ Implications for brand endorsement and content marketing strategies are discussed.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Social Media · Social Media Influencers · Influencer Marketing

Abstract

Social media platforms have created a new industry where both influencers and consumers are empowered. Consumers do not only consume but also contribute to the content they face on social media. Through their narratives and content, they may even become social media influencers who have the power to shape the attitudes and behavior of fellow consumers. An important social medium, YouTube, allows people to engage with social media influencers by liking, commenting, sharing, etc. However, engagement practices are not similarly shared among every YouTube user, and people have different reaction styles. Thus, measuring success in creating engaging content becomes a controversial issue for brand endorsement. This research aims to uncover consumer typologies in terms of engagement behavior with social media influencers on YouTube. The influential motives of engagement for each typology are also analyzed in order to describe the groups. For this purpose, 341 participants from Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (MTurk) platform participated in an online survey, and a two-step cluster analysis was conducted with eleven common social media engagement practices with influencers. The results implied a three-cluster solution, and the clusters were profiled according to several social media engagement motivations. The groups were named as ‘positively active followers,’ ‘passive followers,’ and ‘analytical followers.’ Implications for brand endorsement and content marketing strategies are discussed.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDOĞMUŞ, Z. İ., ARSLAN, M. K. (2022). Engaging with Social Media Influencers on Youtube: A Cluster Analysis. Istanbul Business Research, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 1, 359–373. https://ajindex.com/articles/542730

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abendroth, L. J., and J. E. Heyman. 2013. “Honesty Is the Best Policy: The Effects of Disclosure in Word-of-Mouth Marketing.” Journal of Marketing Communications 19 (4): 245– 257. Arora, A., Bansal, S., Kandpal, C., Aswani, R., & Dwivedi, Y. (2019). Measuring social media influencer index-insights from Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 49, 86-101.
  2. Bowden, J.L.H. (2009), “The process of consumer engagement: a conceptual framework”, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 63-74.
  3. Brechman, JM., Purvis, S.C. (2015) Narrative transportation and advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 34 (2) pp. 366-381.
  4. Brodie, J.R., Hollebeek, L., Juric, B. and Ilic, A. (2011), “Consumer engagement: conceptual domain, fundamental propositions and implications for research”, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 252-271.
  5. Childers, C.C., Lemon, L.L. and Hoy, M.G. (2019), “#sponsored #ad: agency perspective on influencer marketing campaigns”, Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 258-274.
  6. Daniel Jr, E. S., Crawford Jackson, E. C., & Westerman, D. K. (2018). The influence of social media influencers: Understanding online vaping communities and parasocial interaction through the lens of Taylor’s six-segment strategy wheel. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 18(2), 96-109.
  7. De Vries, L., Gensler, S. and Leeflang, P.S.H. (2012). Popularity of brand posts on brand fan pages: an investigation of the effects of social media marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(2), 83-91.
  8. Dolan, R., Conduit, J., Fahy, J., & Goodman, S. (2016). Social media engagement behaviour: a uses and gratifications perspective. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 24(3-4), 261-277.
  9. Eigenraam, A. W., Eelen, J., Van Lin, A., & Verlegh, P. W. (2018). A consumer-based taxonomy of digital customer engagement practices. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 44, 102-121.
  10. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics 18(3), 382-388.
  11. Freberg, K., Graham, K., McGaughey, K., & Freberg, L. A. (2011). Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions of personality. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 90-92.
  12. Gao, Q., & Feng, C. (2016). Branding with social media: User gratifications, usage patterns, and brand message content strategies. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 868-890.
  13. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C.,