Journals / Istanbul Business Research / 2022 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 1

Does Organizational Culture Impact on Firm Performance: Evidence From Turkey

Pages
149–174
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Consequently, our results are largely in line with the findings of other C/P research, suggesting that the mission trait of the DOCM is the core cultural term in ensuring thriving firm corporate performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper aims to examine the impact of corporate culture over the financial performance of certain enterprises therewith by covering the data of chemical, petroleum, rubber and plastic products firms (XCHEMST) traded in Borsa Istanbul.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In that regard, corporate culture data have been obtained from the surveys of the Denison’s Organizational Culture Model (DOCM) employees and managers of these businesses while the financial data were gleaned from financial statements of the mentioned enterprises between 2012-2016.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Consequently, our results are largely in line with the findings of other C/P research, suggesting that the mission trait of the DOCM is the core cultural term in ensuring thriving firm corporate performance.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2012-2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Firm Performance · Effectiveness · Organizational Culture

Abstract

This paper aims to examine the impact of corporate culture over the financial performance of certain enterprises therewith by covering the data of chemical, petroleum, rubber and plastic products firms (XCHEMST) traded in Borsa Istanbul. In that regard, corporate culture data have been obtained from the surveys of the Denison’s Organizational Culture Model (DOCM) employees and managers of these businesses while the financial data were gleaned from financial statements of the mentioned enterprises between 2012-2016. We posited the ROE as a dependent variable while ROA and DEBT EQUITY have been employed as explanatory financial variables. Accordingly, we have determined SIZE and AGE as firm-specific variables. Utilizing cross-sectional data and multiple linear regression models, we estimated the coefficients of the variables with the aid of an OLS estimator. In so doing, this paper provides sufficient empirical evidence that three out of four cultural traits in the Denison’s Theory have had no impact on the financial performance of Turkey’s chemical firms traded on BIST, whereas the mission trait has had a significant impact. Consequently, our results are largely in line with the findings of other C/P research, suggesting that the mission trait of the DOCM is the core cultural term in ensuring thriving firm corporate performance.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOYUKASLAN, A., AŞIKOĞLU, H. R. (2022). Does Organizational Culture Impact on Firm Performance: Evidence From Turkey. Istanbul Business Research, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 1, 149–174. https://ajindex.com/articles/542724

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Abu-Jarad, I. Y., Yusof, N. A., & Nikbin, D. 2010. A review paper on organizational culture and organizational performance. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3. Al-Musali, M. A. K., & Ismail, K. N. I. K. 2014. Intellectual capital and its effect on financial performance of banks: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164, 201-207.
  2. Banchuenvijit, W. 2012. Determinants of firm performance of Vietnam listed companies. Academic and Business Research Institute. 1-7.
  3. Barney, J. B. 1986. Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? Academy of Management Review, 11, 656-665.
  4. Bennett, R. H., Fadil, P. A., & Greenwood, R. T. 1994. Cultural alignment in response to strategic organizational change: New considerations for a change framework. Journal of Managerial Issues, 6, 474-490.
  5. Bezrukova, K., Thatcher, S., Jehn, K. A., & Spell, C. S. 2012. The effects of alignments: Examining group faultlines, organizational cultures and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 77-92.
  6. Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. 1997. Statistics notes: Cronbach's alpha. British Medical Journal, 314, 572. Boyce, A. S., Nieminen, L. R., Gillespie, M. A., Ryan, A. M., & Denison, D. R. 2015. Which comes first, organizational culture or performance? A longitudinal study of causal priority with automobile dealerships. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 339-359.
  7. Buyukozturk, Ş. 2002. Faktör analizi: Temel kavramlar ve ölçek geliştirmede kullanımı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi / Factor analysis: Basic concepts and its use in scale development. Educational Administration in Theory and Practice 32,470-483.
  8. Cakir, H. M., & Kucukkaplan, İ. (2012). İşletme sermayesi unsurlarının firma değeri ve kârlılığı üzerindeki etkisinin IMKB’de işlem gören üretim firmalarında 2000-2009 dönemi için analizi. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi / Analyzing effects of working capital component on profitability and valuation at manufacturing firm in ISE for 2000-2009
  9. Period, Journal of Accounting & Finance, 1, 69-86.
  10. Calori, R., & Sarnin, P. 1991. Corporate culture and economic performance: A French study. Organization Studies, 12, 49-74.
  11. Cameron, K. S. 1986. Effectiveness as paradox: Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Management Science, 32, 539-553.
  12. Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. 2011. Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. John Wiley and Son