Journals / Isı Bilimi ve Tekniği Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2

COMPARISON OF OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF CONVENTIONAL, DIESEL-ELECTRIC AND HYBRID-ELECTRIC CITY BUSSES UNDER REAL WORLD

Pages
143–154
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The main reason for the lower energy consumption of the HE bus is that while the HE bus takes advantages of downhill and frequent stopand-go driving conditions by recovering the braking energy, the conventional and DE buses waste their braking energies

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Basic operating characteristics of Conventional, Diesel-Electric (DE) and Hybrid-Electric (HE) city busses were compared under real world urban driving conditions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The main difference was that while the engine powers of the conventional and DE buses increased steeply to their maximum with the increasing bus speed, the engine power of the HE bus increased gradually to its maximum.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The main reason for the lower energy consumption of the HE bus is that while the HE bus takes advantages of downhill and frequent stopand-go driving conditions by recovering the braking energy, the conventional and DE buses waste their braking energies
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Basic operating characteristics of Conventional, Diesel-Electric (DE) and Hybrid-Electric (HE) city busses were compared under real world urban driving conditions. To perform the comparison, real-time operating data of the buses were collected on Campus-Return route of Sakarya Municipality. It was observed that although traction powers versus bus speeds indicated similarities for all the buses, engine powers versus bus speeds did not indicate the same similarities. The main difference was that while the engine powers of the conventional and DE buses increased steeply to their maximum with the increasing bus speed, the engine power of the HE bus increased gradually to its maximum. Traction, braking and engine energy traces of the buses indicated similar trends, also. While the traction and braking energy traces were quite similar, the engine energy traces were significantly different although the buses were driven on the same route. The engine energies per km travel for the HE, conventional and DE buses were 1.30, 1.55 and 2.08 kW-h/km, respectively. Compared to the engine energy of the HE bus, that of the conventional and DE buses are 20% and 60% higher, respectively. In addition, the engine energies were 1.29, 1.48 and 1.84 times higher than their respective traction energies for the HE, conventional and DE buses, respectively. The main reason for the lower energy consumption of the HE bus is that while the HE bus takes advantages of downhill and frequent stopand-go driving conditions by recovering the braking energy, the conventional and DE buses waste their braking energies

Özet

Konvansiyonel, Dizel-Elektrik ve Hibrit Elektrik şehir otobüslerinin temel operasyon karakteristikleri gerçek dünya şehir içi sürüş şartlarında karşılaştırıldı. Bu karşılaştırma için otobüslerin gerçek zamanlı dataları Sakarya Büyükşehir Belediyesi'nin Kampüs-Dönüş rotasında toplandı. Bütün otobüslerin çekiş gücü-otobüs hızı karakteristiklerinin benzer olduğu halde motor gücü- otobüs hızı karakteristiklerinin farklı olduğu görüldü. Temel farklılık, Konvansiyonel ve Dizel-Elektrik otobüslerin motor güçlerinin artan hız ile aniden maksimuma ulaştığı halde Hibrit-Elektrik otobüsün gücü tedrici olarak yükselmesiydi. Otobüslerin çekiş, frenleme, ve motor enerjileri de benzer bir yönelim göstermekteydi. Otobüsler aynı rota üzerinde kullanıldığı halde çekiş ve frenleme enerjileri benzerlik gösterirken motor enerjileri oldukça farklı kalmaktaydı. Konvansiyonel, Dizel-Elektrik ve Hibrit-Elektrik otobüslerin motor enerjileri her km seyehat için sırası ile 1.30, 1.55 ve 2.08 kW-h/km oldu. Hibrit-Elektrik otobüsün motor enerjisi ile kıyaslandığında Konvansiyonel ve Dizel-Elektrik otobüsün enerjileri %20 ve %60 daha fazla olmuştur. Ek olarak, Konvansiyonel, Dizel-Elektrik ve Hibrit Elektrik otobüslerin motor enerjilerinin kendi çekiş enerjilerinden sırası ile 1.29, 1.48 ve 1.84 kat daha fazla olduğu görülmüştür. Hibrit-Elektrik otobüsün eneji tüketiminin daha az olmasının en önemli sebebi Konvansiyonel ve Dizel Elektrik otobüsün bayır aşağı ve sık sık dur kalk yapan sürüşlerdeki frenleme enerjisini ısıya dönüştürerek kayıbettiği halde Hibrit-Elektrik otobüsün bu frenleme enerjisini geri kazanabilmesidir

🔖

Cite This Article

SOYLU, Ş. (2022). COMPARISON OF OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF CONVENTIONAL, DIESEL-ELECTRIC AND HYBRID-ELECTRIC CITY BUSSES UNDER REAL WORLD. Isı Bilimi ve Tekniği Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2, 143–154. https://ajindex.com/articles/542541

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Ahn JK, Jung KH, Kim DH, Jin HB, Kim HS, Hwang SH. Analysis of a Regenerative Braking System for Hybrid Electric Vehicles Using an Electro-mechanical Brake, Int. J. Automot. Technol. 2009; 10: 229-234.
  2. Baisden, A.C.; Emadi, A. (2004) ADVISOR-Based Model of a Battery and an Ultra-Capacitor Energy Source for Hybrid Electric Vehicles, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, VOL. 53, NO. 1, January Bal A, Semercioglu H, Soylu S, Ay EF. Sehir otobüslerinin gerçek dünya koşullarinda motor calişma şartlarinin ve NOx emisyonlarinin incelenmesi, Otekon 5. Otomotiv Teknolojileri Kongresi, 7-8
  3. Haziran, Bursa,Turkey. Barrero R, Coosemans T, Van Mierlo J. Hybrid buses: defining the power flow management strategy and energy storage system needs, World Electric Vehicle Journal 2009; 3: 2032-6653.
  4. Butler KL, Ehsani M, Kamath P. A Matlab-Based Modeling and Simulation Package for Electric and Hybrid Electric Vehicle Design, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 1999; 48: 1770-1778.
  5. Cocker DR, Shah SD, Johnson K, Miller JW, Norbeck JM. Development and Application of a Mobile Laboratory for Measuring Emissions from Diesel Engines. 1. Regulated Gaseous Emissions, Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004; 38: 2182-2189. Davis PB. Overview of the U.S. DOE Vehicle Technologies Technologies Renewable Energy U.S. Department of Energy, DOE- ACE-2011AR, USA, 2012. Office Energy Efficiency and DieselNet. Internet resources, Emissions Standards: Heavy-Duty www.dieselnet.com/links/regulations_hd.html accessed 10 February 2013). Vehicles, (2013,
  6. Durbin TD, Johnson K, Cocker DR, Miller JW. Evaluation and Comparison of Portable Emissions Measurement Systems and Federal Reference Methods for Emissions from a Back-Up Generator and a Diesel Truck Operated on a Chassis Dynamometer. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007; 41: 6199-6204.
  7. Erlandsson L, Almen J, Johansson H. Measurement of emissions from heavy duty vehicles meeting Euro IV/V emission levels by using on-board measurement in real life operation. In: 16th International Symposium "Transport and Air Pollution", 2008, Graz. Ganley JC. Design and testing of a series hybrid vehicle with an ultracapacitor energy buffer, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering 2012; 226: 869-880.
  8. Grbovic, P.J.; Delarue, P.; Le Moigne, P. (2012) Selection and Design of Ultra-Capacitor Modules for Power Conversion Applications: From Theory to Practice, Electronics and Motion Control Conference - ECCE Asia June 2-5, 2012,
  9. Harbin, Chin