Journals / Isı Bilimi ve Tekniği Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 1

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR THERMAL ARCHITECTURES OF FLUE-GAS ASSISTED ORGANIC RANKINE CYCLE SYSTEMS

Pages
65–76
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For analyzed cases in this study, Scenario-4 (i.e., thermal architecture 4) shows the best system performance with 69% exergetic efficiency within the thermodynamic and practical limits.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Effective use of waste heat at low and medium temperatures is considered as one of the solutions to alleviate energy shortages and environmental pollution problems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Parametric studies were also carried out to investigate the effect of operating parameters on performance indicators such as efficiency, economical profit and performance ratio.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For analyzed cases in this study, Scenario-4 (i.e., thermal architecture 4) shows the best system performance with 69% exergetic efficiency within the thermodynamic and practical limits.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Effective use of waste heat at low and medium temperatures is considered as one of the solutions to alleviate energy shortages and environmental pollution problems. Due to its feasibility and reliability, the organic Rankine cycle is continued to attract widespread interest from researchers and/or manufacturers. This paper presents thermodynamic and economic analyses on flue-gas assisted organic Rankine cycles (FGA-ORCs) based on both energy and exergy concepts. The heat source of the FGA-ORC system is the exhaust flue-gas of a stenter-frame which is highly used in textile finishing process. In this study, to convert thermal energyinto electrical and/or mechanical energy on a small scale, an optimization study was performed using five different cycle architectures. Parametric studies were also carried out to investigate the effect of operating parameters on performance indicators such as efficiency, economical profit and performance ratio. Finally, under specified operating conditions, the thermal architecture was identified that reduces exergy destruction and increases economic profit due to increased net-work output. For analyzed cases in this study, Scenario-4 (i.e., thermal architecture 4) shows the best system performance with 69% exergetic efficiency within the thermodynamic and practical limits.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜRKAN, B., ETEMOĞLU, A. B. (2022). PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR THERMAL ARCHITECTURES OF FLUE-GAS ASSISTED ORGANIC RANKINE CYCLE SYSTEMS. Isı Bilimi ve Tekniği Dergisi, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 1, 65–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/542469

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Agromayor R. and Nord L.O., 2017, Fluid Selection and Thermodynamic Optimization of Organic Rankine Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery Applications, Energy Procedia, 129, 527-534.
  2. Al-Sulaiman F.A., Dincer I. and HamdullahpurF., 2012, Energy and Exergy Analyses of a Biomass Trigeneration System Using an Organic Rankine Cycle, Energy, 45, 975-985.
  3. Astolfi M., Martelli E., Pierobon L., 2017, Section 7. Thermodynamic and Technoeconomic Optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle Systems, Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) Power Systems Technologies and Applications, edited by Macchi E and Astolfi M., Elsevier, United Kingdom. Bao J. and Zhao L., 2013, A Review of Working Fluid and Expander Selections for Organic Rankine Cycle, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 24, 325–342. Bejan A., 2002,
  4. Fundamentals of Exergy Analysis, Entropy Generation Minimization, and the Generation of Flow Architecture, International Journal of Energy Research, 26, 545-565. Braimakis K. and Karellas S., 2018, Energetic Optimization of Regenerative Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC), Energy Conversion and Management, 159, 353–370. Cengel Y.A and Boles M.A., 1989, Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach, McGraw Hill Book Co., Singapore. Cengel Y.A., Wood B. and Dincer I., 2002, Is Bigger Thermodynamically Better? Exergy, 2, 62-68. Cengel Y.A., 2007,
  5. Green Thermodynamics, International Journal of Energy Research, 31, 1088–1104.
  6. Chen H., Goswami D.Y. and Stefanakos, E.K., 2010, A Review of Thermodynamic Cycles and Working Fluids for the Conversion of Low-Grade Heat, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14, 3059–3067. Delgado-Torres A.M. and García-Rodríguez L., 2010, Analysis and Optimization of the Low-Temperature Solar Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC), Energy Conversion and Management, 51, 2846–2856. El-Emam R.S. and Dincer I., 2013, Exergy and Exergoeconomic Analyses and Optimization of Geothermal Organic Rankine Cycle, Applied Thermal Engineering, 59,435-444. Etemoglu A.B., 2013, Thermodynamic Investigation of Low-Temperature Industrial Waste-Heat Recovery in Combined Heat and Power Generation Systems, International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 42, 82–88.
  7. Forman C., Muritala I.K., Pardemann R. andMeyer B., 2016, Estimating the Global Waste Heat Potential, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 57, 1568–1579.
  8. Fu B.R., Hsu S.W. and Liu C.H., 2014, Trends in Patent Applications Relating to Organic Rankine Cycle, Procedia Engineering, 79, 249–257.Fu B.R., Lee Y.R. and Hsieh J.C., 2015, Des