Journals / IOJET / 2016 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 4

IMPROVING THE STUDENT'S OPINION ABOUT THE NATURE OF SCIENCE WITH THE PROCESS-BASED ACTIVITIES BY THE TEACHERS WHO GET DISTANCE EDUCATION ABOUT THE NATURE OF SCIENCE

Journal
IOJET
Pages
261–283
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, the usage of the explicit reflective activities integrated into syllabus has contributed to the perception of the students about the nature of science topic.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this research is to identify the effect of the activities on student's opinion about the science nature which is prepared with the explicit reflective teaching approach and integrated with 9th grade biology lesson syllabus by the teachers who gets distance education about teaching the nature of science.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For that purpose, in this research, quasi experimental design with pretest and posttest control group has been used. 2 teachers and 114 students in an Anatolian High School in Meram/Konya have participated in this research in the whole 2014-2015 academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, the usage of the explicit reflective activities integrated into syllabus has contributed to the perception of the students about the nature of science topic.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2014-2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to identify the effect of the activities on student's opinion about the science nature which is prepared with the explicit reflective teaching approach and integrated with 9th grade biology lesson syllabus by the teachers who gets distance education about teaching the nature of science. For that purpose, in this research, quasi experimental design with pretest and posttest control group has been used. For that purpose, in this research, quasi experimental design with pretest and posttest control group has been used. 2 teachers and 114 students in an Anatolian High School in Meram/Konya have participated in this research in the whole 2014-2015 academic year. In this project, BDHGA Form C (a survey on the ideas about nature of the science), and YYG (semi-structured interview) and Rubic are used as data collecting tools. The qualitative data of the research has been analyzed with content analysis, descriptive analysis and document review. The quantitative data has been analyzed with the SPSS 17 software using ANOVA and T-test for related samples. According to the both quantitative and qualitative data obtained from the research, the experiment class, in which the teacher educated in distant about nature of science and has taught the topic in process based way to the students, is observed to be more developed in this topic than the other class. Also it is seen that only being educated about science nature of the teachers is not adequate. However, the usage of the explicit reflective activities integrated into syllabus has contributed to the perception of the students about the nature of science topic.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIM, F. S., MİRİCİ, S. (2022). IMPROVING THE STUDENT'S OPINION ABOUT THE NATURE OF SCIENCE WITH THE PROCESS-BASED ACTIVITIES BY THE TEACHERS WHO GET DISTANCE EDUCATION ABOUT THE NATURE OF SCIENCE. IOJET, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 4, 261–283. https://ajindex.com/articles/542462

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L. & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82(4), 417- 436. Abd-El-Khalick, F. & Lederman, N. G. (2000a). Improving science teachers conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the lierature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665-701.
  2. Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N.G. (2000b). The influence of history of science courses on students' views of nature of science. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 37(10), 1057-1095.
  3. Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Rutherford's enlarged: A content-embedded activity to teach about nature of science. Physics Education, 37(1), 64-68.
  4. Akçay, B. (2006). The analysis of how to improve student understanding of the nature of science: A role of teacher. Asia-Pasific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 7(2), 10. Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers" conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, (37), 295-317.
  5. Akerson, V. L., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2003). Teaching elements of nature of science: A yearlong case study of a fourth-grade teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10),1025-1049. Akerson V. L., & Volrich M.V. (2006). Teaching nature of science explicitly in a firstgrade internship setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 377-394.
  6. Akerson, V. L., Morrison, J. A., & McDuffie A. R. (2006). One course is not enough: Preservice elementary teachers' retention of improved views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(2), 194-213.
  7. Akindehin, F. (1988). Effect of an instructional package on preservice science teachers' understanding of the nature of science and acquisition of science-related attitudes. Science Education, (72), 73-82. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for All Americans. New York: Oxford University Press. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy: A Project 2061 Report. New York: Oxford University Press.
  8. Arı, Ü. (2010). Investigation of the preservice science teachers? and preservice classroom teachers? wiews on nature of science. Master Thesis, Fırat Unıversty Institute of Science and Technology, Elazığ. Ayvacı, H. Ş. (2007). A study toward teaching the nature of science based on different approaches for