SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi / 1997 / Cilt: 119 - Sayı: 119

THE MARINE PLEISTOCENE SEDIMENTS ANDN PALEOGEOGRAPHY OF THE SOUTHERN THRACE COAST

Mehmet SAKINÇ
Cenk YALTIRAK
Pages
29–29
Publication Date
1997-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The elevated Holocene deposits including Cardium sp. and Murexsp. above recent sea level indicate that comprasional regime is still active.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:During middle-late Pleistocene southern Thrace coast was imposed a transgression that caused the recession of the coast line with respect to the recent one.
📊
Key Findings & Data:On this coast line that was developed as a result of the transgression which caused Paleo-Marmara sea to translate into an archipelago, shoreline elastics including Ostrea edulis, Loripes lacteus abudance zone and beach rock horizon deposited.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The elevated Holocene deposits including Cardium sp. and Murexsp. above recent sea level indicate that comprasional regime is still active.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

During middle-late Pleistocene southern Thrace coast was imposed a transgression that caused the recession of the coast line with respect to the recent one. On this coast line that was developed as a result of the transgression which caused Paleo-Marmara sea to translate into an archipelago, shoreline elastics including Ostrea edulis, Loripes lacteus abudance zone and beach rock horizon deposited. The units which were deposited in the various paleodepositional areas were elevated by tectonic activity, thus gained a regressive character. Successively they were transported back into the sea. The deposits that are preserved up to recent, have different elevations due to their paleogeographical locations and tectonfcs influences. In the marine deposits having imprints of regional uplift, Marmara formation represented by shore line facies of Paleo-Marmara sea was deposited. The elevated Holocene deposits including Cardium sp. and Murexsp. above recent sea level indicate that comprasional regime is still active.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAKINÇ, M., YALTIRAK, C. (1997). THE MARINE PLEISTOCENE SEDIMENTS ANDN PALEOGEOGRAPHY OF THE SOUTHERN THRACE COAST. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, Cilt: 119 - Sayı: 119, 29–29. https://ajindex.com/articles/54246

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Akartuna, M.,1968, Armutlu Yarımadası'nın Jeolojisi: İ.Ü.Fen Fakültesi Monografiler, 20, 105 s. Ambraseys, N.N. ve Finkel, C.F.,1987, The Saros Marmara Eathquake of 9 August 1912: Eart- quake Eng. and Structral Dynamikes,15, 189-211
  2. Andrussoev, N.,1890, Die Schicten von Cap Tschauds: Ann. d.k.k.Nat. Hof. V.66 Ardel,A., 1956, Evreşe Ovası:Türk Coğrafya Derg.,15-16,191-192 ve Kurter, A.,1973, Marmara Denizi: İ.Ü. Coğrafya Derg.,18-19, 57-75 ve İnandık, H., 1957, Marmara denizi'nin teşekkül ve tekamülü: Türk Coğrafya Derg.,17, 1-14 Arıç,C.,1955, Haliç ve Küçükçekmece Gölü böl- gesinin Jeolojisi: İTÜ Maden Fak. (Doktora Tezi) 48 s. Ayık.İ.,1990. Eriklice-Mürefte çevresinin jeolojisi: İTÜ. Maden fakültesi, Lisans tezi, (Basıl- mamış) Bargu, S., 1989-90, Kuzey Anadolu Fayı'nın Gaziköy ve Mürefte (Tekirdağ) Dolaylarında Yapısal özellikleri ve hareket mekanizması: İÜ Yerbilimleri Derg.,7,1-2, 77-97. (Basım 1993)
  3. Barka, A.A. and Kadınsky-Cade, K, 1988, Strike- slip Fault Geometry ın Turkey and its Inf- luence on earthquake activity: Tectonics, 7,3, 663-684.
  4. Başkan, H.G., 1990, Ganos Dağı'nın merkezi kesi- minin jeolojisi: İ.T.Ü. Maden Fakültesi, Lisans Tezi, (Yayınlanmamış) Calvert, F. ve Neumayr, M., 1880, Die Jungen Ab- lagerungen am Hellespoent: Denkschr, k.k.Akad Wıss., math, -nat.KI.40,357-378
  5. Chaput, G., 1957, Etudes sur les terrasses marines du litoral de la mer de Marmara, l. les ter- rases de Yalova: Travaux laboratoire de Geologie de la Faculte des Sciences de Dijon, 18, 129-136
  6. Dowey, J.F.and Şengör, A.M.C., 1979, Aegean and surrounding regions: complex multiplate and continuum tectonics in a convergent zone: Geol.Soc. Am. Bull., Part l, 90,84-92,
  7. English, Th., 1904, Eocene and Later Formations Surrounding the Dardanelles: Quart Journ. Geol Soc. 58 Erinç, S., 1954, Karadeniz ve çevresinin morfolojik tekamülü ile Pleyistosen iklim tahavülleri arasındaki münasebet: İ.Ü. Coğ.Ens.Der. 3,5-6, 46-94 1956, Yalova civarında bahri Pleyistosen depoları ve taraçaları: Türk Coğrafya Derg. 15-16, 188-190.
  8. Erol, O., 1985, Çanakkale Yöresi güney kesiminin jeomorfolojisi: Jeomorfoloji Derg., 13, 1-8. 1992, Çanakkale yöresinin jeomorfolojisi ve neotektoniği: TPJD Bült., 4,1, 147-165.
  9. O ve Nuttal, C.P., 1973, Çanakkale bazı denizel Kuvaterner depoları: Coğrafya Araş. Derg., 5,6, 27-91.
  10. O. ve İnal, A., 1980, Çanakkale Yöresi Karacaviran köyü çevresindeki Kuvaterner depoları ve denizel fosilleri: Jeomorfoloji Derg., 9, 1-35.
  11. Göçmen, K., 1976, Aşağı Meriç vadesi taşkın ovası