Journals / IOJET / 2017 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 4

COMMON AND BRANCH-SPECIFIC NEEDS OF TURKISH TEACHERS ABOUT IN-SERVICE TRAINING COURSES WITHIN THE SCOPE OF FATIH PROJECT

Journal
IOJET
Pages
519–539
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study findings revealed a good deal of research evidence on the divergent training needs of teachers from various subject areas.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:FATIH Project is regarded as one of the most inclusive ICT integration attempts in the history of Turkish education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With this in mind, this qualitative study aims to explore the perceptions and needs of 35 Turkish in-service teachers from different branches about in-service training courses within the scope of FATIH project.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study findings revealed a good deal of research evidence on the divergent training needs of teachers from various subject areas.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

FATIH Project is regarded as one of the most inclusive ICT integration attempts in the history of Turkish education. This nation-wide project entails equipping each classroom with an interactive whiteboard and supplying each student with a Tablet PC. The in-service teacher training courses are by far the most crucial component of the project as teachers are the end-users of those facilities in classrooms. Despite the abundance of studies on the opinions and attitudes of teachers towards the use of ICT technologies in general, to our knowledge, there exists no research study which specifically investigates whether the views and in-service training needs of teachers differ according to their distinct subject areas. With this in mind, this qualitative study aims to explore the perceptions and needs of 35 Turkish in-service teachers from different branches about in-service training courses within the scope of FATIH project. The study adopted a case study design. The research site and participants were selected purposefully. The data were mainly collected through questionnaires, and the accuracy of these data was validated through semi-structured interviews conducted with 30% of the participants. The collected data were analysed through the content analysis method. The study findings revealed a good deal of research evidence on the divergent training needs of teachers from various subject areas. Thus, it suggested that in-service training courses should be planned and organised as branch-specific.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARAÇ, M., SARIOĞLU, M. (2022). COMMON AND BRANCH-SPECIFIC NEEDS OF TURKISH TEACHERS ABOUT IN-SERVICE TRAINING COURSES WITHIN THE SCOPE OF FATIH PROJECT. IOJET, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 4, 519–539. https://ajindex.com/articles/542438

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Adıgüzel, T., Gürbulak, N., & Sarıçayır, H. (2011). Smart boards and their instructional uses. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 8(15), 457-471.
  2. Akcaoglu, M., Gumus, S., Bellibas, M. S., & Boyer, D. M. (2015). Policy, practice, and reality: Exploring a nation-wide technology implementation into Turkish schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(4), 477-491.
  3. Alkan, T., Bilici, A., Akdur, T. E., Temizhan, O., & Cicek, H. (2011). Increasing opportunities improving technology movement (FATIH) project. In Z. Genc (Ed.), Proceedings of 5th international computer & instructional technologies symposium (pp. 370-375).
  4. Elazig, Turkey: Firat University. Altın, H. M., & Kalelioğlu, F. (2015). Fatih Projesi ile ilgili Öğrenci ve Öğretmen Görüşleri. Başkent University Journal of Education, 2(1), 91-108.
  5. Bacon, D. (2011). The interactive whiteboard as a force for pedagogic change. Information Technology in Education Journal, 15, 18. BECTA. (2003). What the research says about interactive whiteboards. Retrieved April 12, 2010, from http://partners.becta.org.uk/page_documents/research/wtrs_whiteboards.pdf
  6. Cheng, Y. C. (2009). Hong Kong educational reforms in the last decade: Reform syndrome and new developments. The International Journal of Educational Management, 23(1), 65-86.
  7. Chow, A. S. (2013). One educational technology colleague's journey from dotcom leadership to university e-learning systems leadership: merging design principles, systemic change and leadership thinking. TechTrends, 57(5), 64-73.
  8. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson Education Çiftçi, S., Taşkaya, S. M., & Alemdar, M. (2013). The opinions of classroom teachers about Fatih Project. Elementary Education Online, 12(1), 227-240.
  9. Drexler, W., Baralt, A., & Dawson, K. (2008). The teach web 2.0 consortium: A tool to promote educational social networking and web 2.0 use among educators. Educational Media International, 45(4), 271-283.
  10. Dursun, Ö. Ö., Kuzu, A., Kurt, A. A., Güllüpınar, F., & Gültekin, M. (2013). Okul yöneticilerinin FATİH Projesinin pilot uygulama sürecine ilişkin görüşleri. Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(1), 100-113.
  11. Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-39.
  12. Gillham, B. (2000). Case study research methods. London: