Journals / IOJET / 2017 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

LANGUAGE TRAVEL SUPPLY: LANGUAGE TOURISM PRODUCT COMPOSITION

Journal
IOJET
Pages
2976–6762
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The model offered in this exploratory study aims at constituting the underlying conceptual framework for subsequent research on the role of different SA programme design characteristics within the language tourism experience

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A systematic review of literature up to date reflects great scholarly interest in the impacts of study abroad (SA) sojourns on foreign language learners' communicative competence.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This paper provides an overview on gains in sociolinguistic and pragmatic competences drawing upon research carried out in this field, which in broad terms supports the belief that both types of competences are effectively developed in SA stays.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The model offered in this exploratory study aims at constituting the underlying conceptual framework for subsequent research on the role of different SA programme design characteristics within the language tourism experience
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

A systematic review of literature up to date reflects great scholarly interest in the impacts of study abroad (SA) sojourns on foreign language learners' communicative competence. This paper provides an overview on gains in sociolinguistic and pragmatic competences drawing upon research carried out in this field, which in broad terms supports the belief that both types of competences are effectively developed in SA stays. This article also offers a detailed account of the main constituents of the language tourism product -the travel component and the language learning component- with a special focus on the educational input and the language learning complements included in the latter. Thus, a fundamental part of the language tourism market system will be depicted from a supply perspective. Following an exploratory approach, a literature review was conducted in order to identify existing and missing knowledge in the field of language travel supply, and key aspects were pinpointed and classified. The taxonomy and underpinning concepts resulting from the categorisation of those key features may be considered the starting point for future investigations on SA programmes. The model offered in this exploratory study aims at constituting the underlying conceptual framework for subsequent research on the role of different SA programme design characteristics within the language tourism experience

🔖

Cite This Article

IGLESİAS, M. (2022). LANGUAGE TRAVEL SUPPLY: LANGUAGE TOURISM PRODUCT COMPOSITION. IOJET, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 2976–6762. https://ajindex.com/articles/542427

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Allen, H. W., Dristas, V., & Mills, N. (2007). Cultural learning outcomes and summer study abroad. In M. Mantero (Ed.), Identity and second language learning: Culture, inquiry, and dialogic activity in educational contexts (pp. 189-215).
  2. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. Bacon, S. M. (2002). Learning the rules: Language development and cultural adjustment during study abroad. Foreign Language Annals, 35 (6), 637-646.
  3. Barron, A. (2003). Acquisition in interlanguage pragmatics: Learning how to do things with words in a study abroad context. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Barron, A. (2006). Learning to Say "You" in German: The Acquisition of Sociolinguistic Competence in a Study Abroad Context. In M. A. DuFon & E. Churchill (Eds.), Language learners in study abroad contexts (pp. 59-88).
  4. Buffalo, NY: Multilingual Matters. Barron, A. (2007). "Ah no honestly we're okay:" Learning to upgrade in a study abroad context. Intercultural Pragmatics, 4 (2), 129-166.
  5. Campbell, C. (1996). Socializing with the teachers and prior language learning experience: A diary study. In K. M. Bailey & D. Nunan (Eds.), Voices from the classroom (pp. 201- 223). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Carroll, J.B. (1967). Foreign language proficiency levels attained by language majors near graduation from college. Foreign Language Annals, 1, 131-151.
  7. Churchill, E., & DuFon, M. A. (2006). Evolving threads in study abroad research. In E. Churchill & M. A. DuFon (Eds.), Language learners in study abroad contexts (pp. 1- 27). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Cohen, A.D., & Shively, R.L. (2007). Acquisition of requests and apologies in Spanish and French: Impact of study abroad and strategy-building intervention. The Modern Language Journal, 91 (2), 189-212.
  8. Coleman, J. (1998). Language Learning and Study Abroad: The European perspective. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 4, 167-203.
  9. Coleman, J., R. Grotjahn, C. Klein-Braley, & U. Raatz. (1994). The European language proficiency survey: a comparative investigation of foreign language learners in schools and universities in several European countries. Language Testing Update, 16, 49-55. Council for Cultural Co-operation, (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Framework_EN.pdf
  10. Deacon, G. (2015a). Activities in Australia. Study Trave