SavedAdd your journal

Journals / IOJET / 2017 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

A COMPARISON OF THE OPINIONS OF THE UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS' FROM GEOGRAPHY DEPARTMENT AND GEOGRAPHY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT AS REGARDS THEIR FIELD COMPETENCE

Nurcan DEMİRALP
Journal
IOJET
Pages
31–59
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was no significant difference in the opinions of Geography Department students regarding the geography field competences

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Turkish Ministry of National Education established special field competencies for secondary education teachers in 2011.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, face-to-face interviews were conducted with 20 students from the Faculty of Education in order to find the origin of results.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was no significant difference in the opinions of Geography Department students regarding the geography field competences
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Turkish Ministry of National Education established special field competencies for secondary education teachers in 2011. Special field competences are field-specific knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary for effective and productive conduct of teaching profession. The aim of the present article is to compare the opinions of Geography Education Department, and Geography Department students regarding the field knowledge, one of the special field competences of geography teaching. The study was based on survey method aimed to reveal an existing situation. However, face-to-face interviews were conducted with 20 students from the Faculty of Education in order to find the origin of results. The study was performed in the spring semester of 2014-2015 academic year with a total of 160 students from 3rd, 4th, and 5th grades of Geography Education Department and 3rd and 4th grades of Geography Department. Significant differences between the opinions of students were compared by ChiSquare analysis by their educational programs. The expressions of Faculty of Education students suggested that they were competent in 7 out of 13 fields, creating a significant difference. There was no significant difference in the opinions of Geography Department students regarding the geography field competences

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRALP, N. (2022). A COMPARISON OF THE OPINIONS OF THE UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS' FROM GEOGRAPHY DEPARTMENT AND GEOGRAPHY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT AS REGARDS THEIR FIELD COMPETENCE. IOJET, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 31–59. https://ajindex.com/articles/542410

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Alım, M. & Bekdemir, Ü. (2006). Coğrafya Öğretmeni Adaylarının Öğretmenlik Mesleğine Yönelik Tutumları [Attitudes of Geography Teacher Candidates Towards Teaching Profession], Milli Eğitim [National Education], 172, 263-275. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih- Coğrafya Fakültesi Coğrafya Bölümü Müfredat Programı [Curriculum of Geography Department, Faculty of Language, History, and Geography, Ankara University of Geography] (4-Year). Retrieved from http://www.dtcf.ankara.edu.tr/files/2014/09/COG2015-2016-GUZ1.pdf
  2. Baş, T. (2003). Anket [Survey]. Ankara:
  3. Seçkin Yayıncılık. CDÖP (2005), Coğrafya Dersi Öğretim Programı (9, 10, 11 ve 12. Sınıflar) [Geography Course Teaching Program (9th, 10th, 11th, and 12th graders)], Ankara:
  4. M.E.B. CDÖP (2006), Coğrafya Dersi Öğretim Programı (9, 10, 11 ve 12. Sınıflar) (2005 Programı) [Geography Course Teaching Program (9th, 10th, 11th, and 12th graders) (2005 Program]. Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi. Coğrafya Dersi (9-12.Sınıflar) Öğretim Programı [Geography Course Teaching Program (9th, - 12th graders)]. Retrieved from http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/www/ogretimprogramlari/icerik/72 Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Coğrafya Eğitimi Anabilim Dalı Müfredat Programı (5 Yıllık). [Curriculum of Geography Teaching Department, Gazi Faculty of Education, Gazi University (5-year)]. Retrieved from http://gefcografya.gazi.edu.tr/posts/view/title/lisans-dersleri- 52326?siteUri=gefcografya Gençtürk, E. & Akbaş, Y. (2013). Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretmenliği Coğrafya Alan Standartlarının Belirlenmesi: Delphi Tekniği Uygulaması [Determining the Geography Field Standards for Social Sciences Teaching: Application of Delphi Technique ]. GEFAD/GUJGEF, 33 (2), 335-353. GESP (Geography Education Standards Project). (1994). Geography For Life: National Geography Content Standards, 1994, Washington DC: National Geographic Society. Gökçe, N. (2009). Türkiye'de Öğretmen Yetiştirmede Coğrafya Eğitiminin Sorunları ve Öneriler [Problems of Geography Education in Teacher's Education in Turkey and Suggestions]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri [Educational Sciences in Theory and Practice], 9(2) 721-768.
  5. İncekara, S. (2007), Ortaöğretim Coğrafya Eğitiminde Uluslararası Eğilimler ve Türkiye Örneği [International Tendencies in Secondary Education Geography Teaching and Example of Turkey]. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi [Marmara Geography Review], 16, 109-130.
  6. Karabağ, S. (2003). Proceedings from Türk Coğrafya Kurumu Coğrafya Kurultayı: Coğrafya Öğretmenlerinin Meslekî Nitelikl