Journals / Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi / 1998 / Cilt: 120 - Sayı: 120

NEOGENE-QUATERNARY EVOLUTION OF THE EASTERN MARMARA REGION, NORTHWEST TURKEY

Pages
119–145
Publication Date
1998-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, structural evolution of actual Marmara sea region which is related to North Anatolian Fault, initiated in Latest Pliocene.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Three main stages have been distinguished in the Neogene-Quaternary morphotectonic evolution in the East Marmara region.
📊
Key Findings & Data:They are Early-middle Miocene, Late Miocene-Pliocene and Latest Pliocene-Present.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, structural evolution of actual Marmara sea region which is related to North Anatolian Fault, initiated in Latest Pliocene.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Three main stages have been distinguished in the Neogene-Quaternary morphotectonic evolution in the East Marmara region. They are Early-middle Miocene, Late Miocene-Pliocene and Latest Pliocene-Present. Three different sedimentary sequences, each overlies the other with an angular uncomformity, have been formed in these stages. Early-middle Miocene sedimentary sequence is characterised by continental detritics whereas the Late Miocene-Pliocene rocks are represented by continental to marine transitional sediments. Terrestrial-marine sediments have been deposited since the latest Pliocene till Present. The region was transformed to denudational area by the closure of the Intra-Pontid Ocean in the end of the Oligocene and it was under the effect of paleotectonic events during the early-middle Miocene. In the end of this erosional period which lasted until the end of middle Miocene, a peneplain morphology covering large area was formed and terrestrial sediments were deposited. Neotectonics which has affected actual geology in the region, initiated in the beginning of late Miocene and occurred in two stages which differ tectonic styles. In the late Miocene-Pliocene time, the region was affected by N-S directed compressional regime and it was uplifted by NE-SW and NW-SE trending strike-slip faults with E-W lying folds as a result of this compression. During this stage, a Late Miocene-Pliocene sedimentary sequence which starts with fluvial sediments at the bottom and passes into lacustrine to marine at the top, was deposited. In the end of the period, depressions in which late MiocenePliocene sediments were deposited, were spread out and the region was formed as a denudational area in the late Pliocene. The second stage of the neotectonic period covers a time interval from the Latest Pliocene to Present and it begun with the occurrence of the North Anatolian Fault. Actual morphology and active tectonic frame of the Eastern Marmara region were developed in this time interval which is known with the transform character of the North Anatolian Fault. However, structural evolution of actual Marmara sea region which is related to North Anatolian Fault, initiated in Latest Pliocene.

🔖

Cite This Article

EMRE, Ö., ERKAL, T., TCHEPALYGA, A., KAZANCI, N., KEÇER, M., ÜNAY, E. (1998). NEOGENE-QUATERNARY EVOLUTION OF THE EASTERN MARMARA REGION, NORTHWEST TURKEY. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, Cilt: 120 - Sayı: 120, 119–145. https://ajindex.com/articles/54240

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Akartuna, M., 1968, Armutlu yarımadasının jeolojisi. İst. Üniv. Fen Fak. Monog., 20, 105 p. Ardel, A., 1954, İznik depresyonu ve Gölü. İst. Üniv. Coğr. Enst. Derg., 5-6, 225-229.
  2. Aydın, M.; Serdar, H.S.; Şahintürk, Ö.; Yazman, M.; Çok- uğraş, R.; Demir, O. and Özçelik, Y., 1987, Cam- dag (Sakarya)-Sünnicedağ (Bolu) yöresinin jeoloji- si. Türkiye Jeol. Kur. Bült., 30, 1-14.
  3. Bargu, S. and Sakınç, M., 1989, İznik Körfezi-İznik Gölü arasında kalan bölgenin jeolojisi ve yapısal özellik- leri. İst. Üniv. Müh. Fak. Yerbilimleri Dergisi, 6, 45- 76. Barka, A. A., 1992, The North Anatolian fault. Annales Tectonicae, 6, 174-195. and Kadinsky-Cade, K., 1988, Strike-slip fault geometry in Turkey and its influence on earthqu- ake activity. Tectonics, 7, 663-684. and Kuşçu, I., 1996, Extents of the North Anatoli- an fault in the İzmit, Gemlik and Bandırma bays. Turkish J. Maripe Sci., 2, 93-106.
  4. Baykal. F. and Önalan, M., 1979, ŞiIe Sedimanter Karışı- ğı (Şile Olitostromu). Türkiye Jeol. Kur. Altınlı Sim- pozyumu, Ankara, 15-25.
  5. Bilgin, T., 1968, Samanlı Dağları. Pub. İst. Üniv. Coğ. Enst., 50, 196 p., 1984, Adapazarı Ovası ve Sapanca oluğunun alüvyal morfolojisi ve Kuvaterner'deki jeomorfolojik tekamülü. Pub. İst. Üniv. Ed. Fak., 2572, 199 p. Brown, T.M. and Kraus, M. J., 1987, Integration of chan- nel and flood-plain suites, I. Developmental sequ- ences and lateral relations of alluvial paleosols. J. Sedim. Petrol., 57, 587-601.
  6. Chaput, E., 1936, Voyages d'etudes geologiques et geo- morphogeniques en Turquie. Paris. (Türkiye'de Jeolojik ve Jeomorfojenik Tetkik Seyahatleri). Çev. A. Tanoğlu. Pub. İst. Üniv. Ed. Fak., 11, 1947.
  7. Crampin, S. and Evans, R., 1986, Neotectonics of the Marmara Sea Region of Turkey. J. geol. Soc. Lond., 143,343-346.
  8. Çetin, O.; Çetin, T. and Ukav, İ., 1995, İzmit Körfezi (Her- sek Burnu-Kaba Burun) Kuvaterner istifinde gözle- nen mollusk kavkılarının Elektron Spin Rezonans (ESR) yöntemi ile tarihlendirilmesi (Electron Spin Resonance (ESR) dating of fossil mollusc shells observed in Quaternary sequence in the Gulf of İz- mit (Hersek Burnu-Kaba Burun). In: İzmit Körfezi Kuvaterner İstifi (Quaternary Sequence in the Gulf of İzmit) (Ed. E. Meriç), 269-276.
  9. Ediger, V. and Ergin, M., 1995, İzmit Körfezi (Hersek Bur- nu-Kaba Burun) Kuvaterner istifinin sedimantoloji- si (Sedimentology of the Quaternary sequence in the Gulf of İzmit, Hersek Burnu-Kaba Burun). In: İzmit Körfezi Kuvaterner İstifi (Quaternary Sequen- ce in the Gulf of İzmit) (Ed. E. Meriç