Journals / IOJET / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4

VIEWS OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION STUDENTS AT TERTIARY LEVEL ABOUT THE METHODS AND TECHNIQUES USED IN ATATÜRK’S PRINCIPLES AND REVOLUTION COURSE

Journal
IOJET
Pages
934–941
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Relying on the findings obtained at the end of the study, the participants reported generally negative views about their instructors’ methods and techniques in The History of Atatürk’s Principles and Revolution course, however, they draw attention to the points such as use of technological aids, students’ presentations, feedback, opportunity projects, opportunity for students asking and answering questions both by the instructor and their peers, forming group works, and letting discussions in the classroom about the topics under discussions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines elementary education department students’ view about the methods and techniques generally preferred by their instructors in teaching The History of Atatürk’s Principles and Revolution I and II courses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For the purpose of the study, the questionnaire (r=.90), investigating the methodological and technical skills of instructors, developed by Çelikkaya and Kuş (2009) has been administered to 1st (n=105) and 4th (n=123) year elementary education students in the faculty of education at a public university.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Relying on the findings obtained at the end of the study, the participants reported generally negative views about their instructors’ methods and techniques in The History of Atatürk’s Principles and Revolution course, however, they draw attention to the points such as use of technological aids, students’ presentations, feedback, opportunity projects, opportunity for students asking and answering questions both by the instructor and their peers, forming group works, and letting discussions in the classroom about the topics under discussions.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study examines elementary education department students’ view about the methods and techniques generally preferred by their instructors in teaching The History of Atatürk’s Principles and Revolution I and II courses. For the purpose of the study, the questionnaire (r=.90), investigating the methodological and technical skills of instructors, developed by Çelikkaya and Kuş (2009) has been administered to 1st (n=105) and 4th (n=123) year elementary education students in the faculty of education at a public university. Descriptive statistics has been used to analyze the data about the views of the elementary education students who participated in the study about The History of Atatürk’s Principles and Revolution I and II courses in terms of use of methods and techniques used by the instructors. Relying on the findings obtained at the end of the study, the participants reported generally negative views about their instructors’ methods and techniques in The History of Atatürk’s Principles and Revolution course, however, they draw attention to the points such as use of technological aids, students’ presentations, feedback, opportunity projects, opportunity for students asking and answering questions both by the instructor and their peers, forming group works, and letting discussions in the classroom about the topics under discussions.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARIÇOBAN, G. (2022). VIEWS OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION STUDENTS AT TERTIARY LEVEL ABOUT THE METHODS AND TECHNIQUES USED IN ATATÜRK’S PRINCIPLES AND REVOLUTION COURSE. IOJET, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4, 934–941. https://ajindex.com/articles/542397

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Cox, J. (2017). Cooperative learning tips and techniques. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/cooperative-learning-tips-and-techniques-2081730
  2. Çelikkaya, T. & Kuş, Z. (2009). Methods and techniques utilized by social sciences teachers. Uludağ University Journal of Faculty of Education, 22(2), 2009, 741-758 Instructional Development Services. Retrieved from https://www.csusm.edu/ids/coursedesign-and-instruction/teaching-methods-and-techniques / index.html DeVires, R., & Zan, B. (1995). Creating a constructivist classroom atmosphere. Young Children, 51(11), 4-13.
  3. Domin, D. S. (1999). A review of laboratory instruction styles. Chemical Education Research, 76(4), 543-547.
  4. Reigeluth, C. M., & Squire, K. (1998). Emerging work on the new paradigm of instructional theories. Educational Technology, 38(4), 41-47.
  5. Sage, S. M., & Torp, L. T. (1997). What does it take to become a teacher of problem based learning? Journal of Staff Development, 18, 32-6.
  6. Shepardson, D. P. (1999). Learning science in a first grade science activity: a Vygotskian perspective. Science Education, 83, 621-638.
  7. Stage, F. K., Muller, P. A., Kinzie, J., & Simmons, A. (1998). Creating learning centered classrooms. What does learning theory have to say? ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 26(4), 151. Vygotsky, Lev (1978). Mind in society. London: Harvard University Press.