Journals / IOJET / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

FACTORS THATFACILITATEORLIMITTHE INCORPORATIONOF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN THE CLASSROOM

Journal
IOJET
Pages
38–59
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, government entities must be responsible to generate policies or strategies in order to improve infrastructure, as well as design training plans according to the needs of each teacher and each institution.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study explores the perceptions of the teachers from the District Education Secretariat (Bogotá-Colombia) on the factors that facilitate or limit the incorporation of Emerging Technologies in the classroom.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample used for this research was based on 241 teachers from different educational institutions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, government entities must be responsible to generate policies or strategies in order to improve infrastructure, as well as design training plans according to the needs of each teacher and each institution.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study explores the perceptions of the teachers from the District Education Secretariat (Bogotá-Colombia) on the factors that facilitate or limit the incorporation of Emerging Technologies in the classroom. The sample used for this research was based on 241 teachers from different educational institutions. The data were collected through an anonymous survey with quantitative and qualitative questions. Open and axial coding was used to identify the different factors in contextual levels, such as microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem and macrosystem.Itwasfoundthatsociodemographicvariablesdonotinfluencethe incorporation of technology in the classroom, in addition, there are three necessary and basic conditions for teachers to begin to incorporate technology in the classroom: motivation, infrastructure and information and communication technologies skills, but for any processes to be successful the teacher must be aware of what he is doing but any attempt to incorporate technology will fail. On the other hand, government entities must be responsible to generate policies or strategies in order to improve infrastructure, as well as design training plans according to the needs of each teacher and each institution.

🔖

Cite This Article

NEİRA, E. A. S., IBANEZ, J. S., CROSETTİ, B. D. B. (2022). FACTORS THATFACILITATEORLIMITTHE INCORPORATIONOF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN THE CLASSROOM. IOJET, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 38–59. https://ajindex.com/articles/542387

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Abarzúa, A., & Cerda, C. (2011). Integración curricular de TIC en educación parvularia. Revista de Pedagogía, 32(90), 13-43.
  2. Andrew, J. (2004). A review of the research literature on barriers to the uptake of ICT by teachers. Retrieved from British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (BECTA): http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/1603/
  3. Arriaza, M. (2006). Guía Práctica de Análisis de Datos. Junta de Andalucia: Ideagonal Diseño Gráfico. Barnes, J., & Kennewell, S. (2017). Investigating teacher perceptions of teaching ICT in Wales. Education and Information Technologies, 22(5), 2485-2497. doi:10.1007/s10639-016-9549-y Berlanga Silvente, V., & Rubio Hurtado, M. J. (2012). Clasificación de pruebas no paramétricas. Cómo aplicarlas en SPSS. REIRE, Revista d’Innovació i Recerca en Educació, 5(2), 101-113. doi:10.1344/reire2012.5.2528 Birk, S., Nygaard, L., Pedersen, S., & Saifuddin, M. (2017). The Potentials of Using Cloud Computing in Schools: A Systematic Literature Review. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1), 190-202.
  4. Boude, O. (2013). Tecnologías emergentes en la educación: una experiencia de formación de docentes que fomenta el diseño de amobientes de aprendizaje. Educación y Sociedad, 34(123), 531-548. doi:10.1590/S0101-73302013000200012 Butler, D., & Sellbon, M. (2002). Barriers to adoption technology for Teaching and Learning. Educase Quartely(2), 22-28. Retrieved from de https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eqm0223.pdf
  5. Cartelli, A., & Palma, M. (2008). Encyclopedia of information and communication technology. New York: Information Science Reference. Carver, L. B. (2016). Teacher Perception of Barriers and Benefits in K-12 Technology Usage. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 15(1), 110-116.
  6. Chan, Y. H. (2003). Biostatistics 102: Quantitative Data –Parametric & Non-parametric Tests. Singapore Med J, 44(8), 391-396.
  7. Claro, M. (2010). La incorporación de tecnologías digitales en educación. Modelos de identificación de buenas prácticas. (N. Unidas, Ed.) Santiago de Chile: Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL). Retrieved from http://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/3772
  8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statiscal power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2. Auflage). Hillsdalle: NJ: Erbaum.Collis, B., & Moonen, J. (2001). Flexible learning in a digital world: Experiences and expectations. London: Kogan Page. Dawes, L. (2000). The National Grid for Learning and the professional development of teache